510(k) · Cleared
ClearedEDEN Peek Cage
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Jmt Co., Ltd. · ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical
Cleared on Sep 13, 2021 as substantially equivalent to K181380 (L&K BIOMED Co., Ltd., 2018) and 1 other predicate after a 440-day review. Its family tree reaches back 16 generations to 2001.
- Decided
- Sep 13, 2021
- Review
- 440 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- ODP
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 2
Its longest line of descent runs back 16 generations to K003155 (2001). 120 ancestors in all, the oldest K841189 (1984). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 16 generations backK003155 Vertebral Body ReplacementOsteotech, Inc. · 2001
- 12 generations between
- 3 generations backK132926 Velofixtm Interbody Fusion SystemU&I Corp. · 2014
- 2 generations backK140864 Veloxtm Interbody Fusion SystemU&I Corp. · 2014
- 1 generation backK171749 Velofix (tm) Interbody Fusion SystemU&I Corporation · 2017
- This deviceK201793 EDEN Peek CageJmt Co., Ltd. · 2021
Show all 16 generations
- Root · 16 generations backK003155 Vertebral Body ReplacementOsteotech, Inc. · 2001
- 15 generations backK012254 VBROsteotech, Inc. · 2001
- 14 generations backK021791 Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2002
- 13 generations backK023570 Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2002
- 12 generations backK031780 Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2003
- 11 generations backK040731 Stryker Spine Vertebral SpacerStryker Spine · 2004
- 10 generations backK042571 Stryker Spine Avs TL Peek SpacerStryker Spine · 2005
- 9 generations backK050624 Stryker Spine Avs PL Peek SpacerStryker Spine · 2005
- 8 generations backK051205 Stryker Spine Avs Asl Peek SpacerStryker Spine · 2005
- 7 generations backK060762 Aesculap Peek Vertebral Body Replacement SystemAesculap, Inc. · 2006
- 6 generations backK071983 Aesculap Peek Intervertebral Body Fusion System: a Space, Cespace…Aesculap Implant Systems, Inc. · 2008 · Recalled
- 5 generations backK111820 Synster Cervical Cage, Alif Cage, Plif Cage, Ptlif Cage, Tlif CageBm Korea Co., Ltd. · 2012
- 4 generations backK122872 Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceDio Medical Co., Ltd. · 2013
- 3 generations backK132926 Velofixtm Interbody Fusion SystemU&I Corp. · 2014
- 2 generations backK140864 Veloxtm Interbody Fusion SystemU&I Corp. · 2014
- 1 generation backK171749 Velofix (tm) Interbody Fusion SystemU&I Corporation · 2017
- This deviceK201793 EDEN Peek CageJmt Co., Ltd. · 2021
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −16 | K003155 | Vertebral Body Replacement | Osteotech, Inc. | 2001 | — |
| −15 | K012254 | VBR | Osteotech, Inc. | 2001 | — |
| −14 | K021791 | Verte-Stack Spinal System | Medtronic Sofamor Danek | 2002 | — |
| −13 | K023570 | Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal System | Medtronic Sofamor Danek | 2002 | — |
| −12 | K031780 | Verte-Stack Spinal System | Medtronic Sofamor Danek | 2003 | — |
| −11 | K040731 | Stryker Spine Vertebral Spacer | Stryker Spine | 2004 | — |
| −10 | K042571 | Stryker Spine Avs TL Peek Spacer | Stryker Spine | 2005 | — |
| −9 | K050624 | Stryker Spine Avs PL Peek Spacer | Stryker Spine | 2005 | — |
| −8 | K051205 | Stryker Spine Avs Asl Peek Spacer | Stryker Spine | 2005 | — |
| −7 | K060762 | Aesculap Peek Vertebral Body Replacement System | Aesculap, Inc. | 2006 | — |
| −6 | K071983 | Aesculap Peek Intervertebral Body Fusion System: a Space, Cespace, Prospace… | Aesculap Implant Systems, Inc. | 2008 | 1 |
| −5 | K111820 | Synster Cervical Cage, Alif Cage, Plif Cage, Ptlif Cage, Tlif Cage | Bm Korea Co., Ltd. | 2012 | — |
| −4 | K122872 | Intervertebral Body Fusion Device | Dio Medical Co., Ltd. | 2013 | — |
| −3 | K132926 | Velofixtm Interbody Fusion System | U&I Corp. | 2014 | — |
| −2 | K140864 | Veloxtm Interbody Fusion System | U&I Corp. | 2014 | — |
| −1 | K171749 | Velofix (tm) Interbody Fusion System | U&I Corporation | 2017 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K201793 | EDEN Peek Cage | Jmt Co., Ltd. | 2021 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1984 | 1 | 0 |
| 1996 | 2 | 0 |
| 1999 | 3 | 0 |
| 2000 | 1 | 0 |
| 2001 | 8 | 0 |
| 2002 | 5 | 0 |
| 2003 | 10 | 0 |
| 2004 | 18 | 0 |
| 2005 | 8 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2 | 0 |
| 2007 | 9 | 0 |
| 2008 | 12 | 0 |
| 2009 | 12 | 0 |
| 2010 | 6 | 0 |
| 2011 | 3 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in ODP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new ODP device
- #1 K222276 CONDUIT Cages; FIBERGRAFT BG Puttyscore 53.4 · 25 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (2)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K181380 | LnK Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage SystemSummary page 4…l Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar, Class II, 510k) 4. Predicate Devices: • LnK Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage System by L&K BIOMED Co., Ltd. • (K181380) VelofixTM Interbody Fusion System by U & I Corporation (K171749) 5. Device Description: The EDEN Peek Cage is offered in va… | 2018 |
| * | K171749 | Velofix (tm) Interbody Fusion SystemSummary page 4…) 4. Predicate Devices: • LnK Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage System by L&K BIOMED Co., Ltd. • (K181380) VelofixTM Interbody Fusion System by U & I Corporation (K171749) 5. Device Description: The EDEN Peek Cage is offered in various device configurations based on based on surgical approac… | 2017 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 20 years and passes through 10 companies; a new generation was cleared every 10 months on median.
- 13 of the 120 ancestors have a recall of any class.
- 3 other devices also cite its predicate K181380.
How does its category compare?
All ODP devicesODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2021, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · ODP
11in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · ODP
87in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · ODP
2in 2025
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · ODP
57in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code ODP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 8 | 89 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 12 | 127 | 1 | 21 |
| 2010 | 9 | 151 | 0 | 54 |
| 2011 | 25 | 113 | 1 | 38 |
| 2012 | 17 | 93 | 0 | 92 |
| 2013 | 18 | 187 | 1 | 78 |
| 2014 | 26 | 118 | 0 | 43 |
| 2015 | 24 | 180 | 0 | 51 |
| 2016 | 17 | 112 | 0 | 37 |
| 2017 | 33 | 104 | 0 | 39 |
| 2018 | 25 | 133 | 0 | 51 |
| 2019 | 22 | 92 | 0 | 141 |
| 2020 | 14 | 89 | 1 | 86 |
| 2021 | 18 | 121 | 0 | 161 |
| 2022 | 12 | 92 | 0 | 50 |
| 2023 | 34 | 165 | 0 | 36 |
| 2024 | 10 | 76 | 0 | 55 |
| 2025 | 11 | 87 | 2 | 57 |
| 2026 | 19 | 117 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The EDEN Peek Cage - PLIF Type is indicated for intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involvedlevel(s).This device is to be used with…
Read the full statement (197 words)
The EDEN Peek Cage - PLIF Type is indicated for intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involvedlevel(s).This device is to be used with autogenous bone graft. The EDEN Peek Cage System is to be used with supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage.
The EDEN Peek Cage - ACIF Type is indicated for intervertebral body fusion in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine with accompanying radicular symptoms at one disc level from the C2-C3 disc to the C7-T1 disc. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The device system is designed for use with supplemental fixation and with autograft to facilitate fusion. Patients should have at least six weeks of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K201793 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K201793: EDEN Peek Cage.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K201793
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026