510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

R:GEN

K220974510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 27, 2022267-day reviewClass II21 CFR 886.4390

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Lutronic Vision, Inc. · HQF Laser, Ophthalmic

Cleared on Dec 27, 2022 as substantially equivalent to K153769 (Lutronic Corporation, 2016) after a 267-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2013.

Decided
Dec 27, 2022
Review
267 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HQF
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K122202 (2013). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 2 generations backK122202 Ellex 2RTEllex Medical Pty, Ltd. · 2013
  2. 1 generation backK153769 R:GEN Laser SystemLutronic Corporation · 2016
  3. This deviceK220974 R:GENLutronic Vision, Inc. · 2022
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K122202Ellex 2RTEllex Medical Pty, Ltd.2013—
−1K153769R:GEN Laser SystemLutronic Corporation2016—
0 (this device)K220974R:GENLutronic Vision, Inc.2022—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K220974, 2013–2022Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HQF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HQF device

  1. #1 K251772 Navilas Laser System 577sl (156691)score 13.6 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K153769R:GEN Laser System
Summary page 4
…E IDENTIFICATION The R:GEN is substantially equivalent to the following predicate: 510(k) Number Predicate Device Name / Manufacturer Primary Predicate K153769 R:GEN Laser System …
Lutronic Corporation2016—
†K122202Ellex 2RTEllex Medical Pty, Ltd.2013—
†K121475Txcell Scanning Laser Delivery SystemIridex Corp2012—
†K123542Pascal Synthesis (532NM/577NM) Opthalmic LaserTopcon Medical Laser Systems, Inc.20131

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 9 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6.2 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.

How does its category compare?

All HQF devices

HQF Laser, Ophthalmic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2022, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · HQF

3in 2025

2007: 42008: 32009: 72010: 22011: 42012: 52013: 62014: 32015: 42016: 32017: 32018: 12019: 42020: 42021: 12022: 72023: 52024: 32025: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 7 (2009) · low 1 (2018)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HQF

264in 2025

2007: 198 days median2008: 28 days median2009: 115 days median2011: 128 days median2012: 179 days median2013: 225 days median2014: 215 days median2015: 295 days median2016: 271 days median2017: 189 days median2019: 107 days median2020: 53 days median2022: 86 days median2023: 155 days median2024: 167 days median2025: 264 days median
2007high 295 (2015) · low 28 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HQF

1in 2025

2007: 22008: 12009: 22010: 32011: 52012: 12013: 22014: 42025: 1
2007high 5 (2011) · low 0 (2015)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HQF

106in 2025

2007: 602008: 342009: 332010: 432011: 262012: 412013: 392014: 582015: 802016: 1082017: 772018: 822019: 662020: 722021: 1002022: 1112023: 922024: 752025: 106
2007high 111 (2022) · low 26 (2011)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HQF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20074198260
2008328134
20097115233
20102—343
20114128526
20125179141
20136225239
20143215458
20154295080
201632710108
20173189077
20181—082
20194107066
2020453072
20211—0100
20227860111
20235155092
20243167075
202532641106
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

The R:GEN is indicated for use by an ophthalmic physician to produce a wound to the Retinal Pigmented Epithelium (RPE) of the retina of the eye, via focal laser treatment, in the treatment of Clinically Significant Macular Edema (CSME).

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K220974: R:GEN.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K220974

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026