510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

CompuFlo Epidural Computer Controlled Anesthesia System

K221702510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 25, 2023257-day reviewClass II21 CFR 880.5860

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Milestone Scientific, Inc. · FMF Syringe, Piston

Cleared on Feb 25, 2023 as substantially equivalent to K161883 (Milestone Scientific, Inc., 2017) after a 257-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 2000.

Decided
Feb 25, 2023
Review
257 days
Class
Class II
Product code
FMF
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K001731 (2000). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 3 generations backK001731 Avid-Nit Loss of Resistance SyringeAvid Medical, Inc. · 2000 · Recalled
  2. 2 generations backK093863 EpidrumExmoor Plastics, Ltd. · 2010
  3. 1 generation backK161883 CompuFlo Epidural Computer Controlled Anesthesia SystemMilestone Scientific, Inc. · 2017
  4. This deviceK221702 CompuFlo Epidural Computer Controlled Anesthesia SystemMilestone Scientific, Inc. · 2023
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K001731Avid-Nit Loss of Resistance SyringeAvid Medical, Inc.20001
−2K093863EpidrumExmoor Plastics, Ltd.2010—
−1K161883CompuFlo Epidural Computer Controlled Anesthesia SystemMilestone Scientific, Inc.2017—
0 (this device)K221702CompuFlo Epidural Computer Controlled Anesthesia SystemMilestone Scientific, Inc.2023—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K221702, 2000–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FMF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new FMF device

  1. #1 K241821 Luer Lock Syringe with Safety Needle; Luer…score 16.2 · 8 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K161883CompuFlo Epidural Computer Controlled Anesthesia System
Summary page 4
…thesia System is substantially equivalent to the following predicates: 510(k) Number Predicate Device Name / Manufacturer Predicate/Reference K161883 CompuFlo® Epidural Computer Controlled Pr…
Milestone Scientific, Inc.2017—
†K201356Plastic LOR SyringeJiangsu Caina Medical Co.,Ltd2021—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 23 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 7.1 years on median.
  • 1 of the 3 ancestors has a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All FMF devices

FMF Syringe, Piston: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2023, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · FMF

13in 2025

2007: 232008: 92009: 142010: 112011: 162012: 92013: 122014: 132015: 112016: 122017: 132018: 82019: 112020: 152021: 202022: 242023: 222024: 142025: 132026 (partial year): 9
2007high 24 (2022) · low 8 (2018)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FMF

114in 2025

2007: 90 days median2008: 74 days median2009: 94 days median2010: 130 days median2011: 109 days median2012: 86 days median2013: 154 days median2014: 84 days median2015: 87 days median2016: 146 days median2017: 135 days median2018: 87 days median2019: 146 days median2020: 107 days median2021: 175 days median2022: 211 days median2023: 173 days median2024: 130 days median2025: 114 days median2026 (partial year): 239 days median
2007high 239 (2026) · low 74 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · FMF

19in 2023

2007: 62008: 112009: 152010: 122011: 32012: 62013: 12014: 12015: 22017: 32018: 22019: 12020: 22021: 12022: 22023: 19, 18 Class I2026 (partial year): 2, 1 Class I
2007high 19 (2023) · low 0 (2016)2026

Class I (19 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FMF

4,181in 2025

2007: 6742008: 6912009: 9132010: 6792011: 1862012: 3072013: 3262014: 2442015: 2732016: 6842017: 1,8582018: 3,9522019: 5,8632020: 5,3342021: 5,8742022: 5,2332023: 5,2142024: 5,1222025: 4,181
2007high 5,874 (2021) · low 186 (2011)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FMF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200723906674
200897411691
2009149415913
20101113012679
2011161093186
20129866307
2013121541326
201413841244
201511872273
2016121460684
20171313531,858
201888723,952
20191114615,863
20201510725,334
20212017515,874
20222421125,233
20232217319 (18)5,214
20241413005,122
20251311404,181
202692392 (1)—

What is it indicated for?

The CompuFlo® Epidural Computer Control Anesthesia System is intended for use with an epidural needle for the real-time verification of needle placement in the lumbar or thoracic epidural space, inclusive of cervicothoracic junction (CTJ). It is intended for patients over age of 18 who are required to have epidural needle or catheter placement as part of a medically necessary, in-patient or out-patient procedure, as established by their Health Care…

Read the full statement (145 words)

The CompuFlo® Epidural Computer Control Anesthesia System is intended for use with an epidural needle for the real-time verification of needle placement in the lumbar or thoracic epidural space, inclusive of cervicothoracic junction (CTJ). It is intended for patients over age of 18 who are required to have epidural needle or catheter placement as part of a medically necessary, in-patient or out-patient procedure, as established by their Health Care Provider (HCP).

The CathCheck is an additional feature for clinicians to use to assess proper catheter placement inside the epidural space by evaluating a pulsatile waveform. The CathCheck function utilizes the same technology as the CompuFlo® Epidural Computer Control Anesthesia System and should only be used in conjunction with standard clinical assessment practice.

Once the Health Care Provider verifies the epidural needle or catheter placement in the epidural space, the HCP continues with the medical procedure.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K221702: CompuFlo Epidural Computer Controlled Anesthesia System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K221702

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026