510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

PEEK Spinal Infusion Cage

K223776510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 3, 202377-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Changzhou Geasure Medical Apparatus and Instruments Co., Ltd. · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Mar 3, 2023 as substantially equivalent to K073291 (Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., 2008) after a 77-day review. Its family tree reaches back 10 generations to 1984.

Decided
Mar 3, 2023
Review
77 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 10 generations to K841189 (1984). 28 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 10 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 6 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK062759 Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  4. 2 generations backK072120 Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  5. 1 generation backK073291 Capstone Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2008
  6. This deviceK223776 PEEK Spinal Infusion CageChangzhou Geasure Medical Apparatus and Instruments Co., Ltd. · 2023
Show all 10 generations
  1. Root · 10 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 9 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 8 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  4. 7 generations backK022793 Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  5. 6 generations backK031757 Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  6. 5 generations backK041888 Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2004
  7. 4 generations backK042930 Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc. · 2004
  8. 3 generations backK062759 Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  9. 2 generations backK072120 Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  10. 1 generation backK073291 Capstone Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2008
  11. This deviceK223776 PEEK Spinal Infusion CageChangzhou Geasure Medical Apparatus and Instruments Co., Ltd. · 2023
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−10K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−9K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−8K003043Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−7K022793Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−6K031757Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−5K041888Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH2004—
−4K042930Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc.2004—
−3K062759Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc.2007—
−2K072120Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc.2007—
−1K073291Capstone Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.2008—
0 (this device)K223776PEEK Spinal Infusion CageChangzhou Geasure Medical Apparatus and Instruments Co., Ltd.2023—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199620
199920
200010
200130
200230
200320
200440
200510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K223776, 1984–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K073291Capstone Spinal System
Summary page 4
…r Medtronic Sofainor Danek USA, Inc. Trade name CAPSTONE乜 Spinal System 510(K) Number K073291 Regulatory Class II Primary Predicate Regulation Number 21 CFR 888.3080…
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.2008—

Also cleared against K073291: 40 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 39 years and passes through 9 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.7 years on median.
  • 4 of the 28 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 40 other devices also cite its predicate K073291.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2023, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The PEEK Spinal Fusion Cage is indicated for interbody fusion with autogenous bone graft in patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) at one or two levels from L2 to S1. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved levels. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have had six…

Read the full statement (140 words)

The PEEK Spinal Fusion Cage is indicated for interbody fusion with autogenous bone graft in patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) at one or two levels from L2 to S1. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved levels. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have had six months of non-operative treatment. These implants are to be used with autogenous bone graft.

The PEEK Spinal Fusion Cage may be implanted via an open or a minimally invasive posterior approach. Alternatively, these implants may also be implanted via an transforaminal approach.

These devices are intended to be used with supplemental fixation instrumentation, which has been cleared by FDA for use in the lumbar spine.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K223776: PEEK Spinal Infusion Cage.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K223776

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026