510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

DePuy 3D Additive TriFlange Acetabular Cup and DePuy TriFlange II Acetabular Cup System

K232556510(k) SpecialCleared Sep 20, 202328-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3358

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Depuy Ireland UC · LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented

Cleared on Sep 20, 2023 as substantially equivalent to K201348 (Depuy International, Ltd., 2022) and 1 other predicate after a 28-day review. Its family tree reaches back 6 generations to 1993.

Decided
Sep 20, 2023
Review
28 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LPH
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 6 generations to K930712 (1993). 21 ancestors in all, the oldest K840643 (1984). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 6 generations backK930712 P.F.C. Total Hip System Porous Coated ModularJohnson & Johnson Orthopaedics, Inc. · 1993
  2. 5 generations backK983014 Summit Acetabular SystemJohnson & Johnson Professionals, Inc. · 1998
  3. 4 generations backK000306 Pinnacle Acetabular SystemDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2000 · Recalled
  4. 3 generations backK001534 Pinnacle Acetabular SystemDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2000
  5. 2 generations backK040383 Triflange II Acetabular Cup SystemDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2004
  6. 1 generation backK201348 DePuy 3D Additive TriFlange Acetabular CupDepuy International, Ltd. · 2022
  7. This deviceK232556 DePuy 3D Additive TriFlange Acetabular Cup and DePuy TriFlange II…Depuy Ireland UC · 2023
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−6K930712P.F.C. Total Hip System Porous Coated ModularJohnson & Johnson Orthopaedics, Inc.1993—
−5K983014Summit Acetabular SystemJohnson & Johnson Professionals, Inc.1998—
−4K000306Pinnacle Acetabular SystemDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.20001
−3K001534Pinnacle Acetabular SystemDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.2000—
−2K040383Triflange II Acetabular Cup SystemDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.2004—
−1K201348DePuy 3D Additive TriFlange Acetabular CupDepuy International, Ltd.2022—
0 (this device)K232556DePuy 3D Additive TriFlange Acetabular Cup and DePuy TriFlange II Acetabular…Depuy Ireland UC2023—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198410
199430
199530
199620
199720
199820
200010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K232556, 1993–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LPH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LPH device

  1. #1 K233498 Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling Updatescore 24.2 · 20 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K201348DePuy 3D Additive TriFlange Acetabular Cup
Summary page 5
…Regulation 21 CFR 888.3358, 888.3353 Product Code(s) LPH, MEH Legally marketed device(s) DePuy 3D Additive TriFlange Acetabular Cup (K201348) to which equivalence is DePuy TriFlange II Acetabular Cup System (K040383) (Primary Predicate) claimed…
Depuy International, Ltd.2022—
*K040383Triflange II Acetabular Cup System
Summary page 5
…LPH, MEH Legally marketed device(s) DePuy 3D Additive TriFlange Acetabular Cup (K201348) to which equivalence is DePuy TriFlange II Acetabular Cup System (K040383) (Primary Predicate) claimed…
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.2004—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 30 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.9 years on median.
  • 4 of the 20 ancestors have a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All LPH devices

LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2023, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LPH

12in 2025

2007: 102008: 102009: 32010: 152011: 162012: 252013: 112014: 202015: 182016: 102017: 122018: 92019: 222020: 72021: 82022: 142023: 102024: 62025: 122026 (partial year): 8
2007high 25 (2012) · low 3 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LPH

153in 2025

2007: 116 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 112 days median2010: 100 days median2011: 110 days median2012: 76 days median2013: 135 days median2014: 129 days median2015: 111 days median2016: 150 days median2017: 121 days median2018: 145 days median2019: 164 days median2020: 164 days median2021: 410 days median2022: 247 days median2023: 111 days median2024: 92 days median2025: 153 days median2026 (partial year): 256 days median
2007high 410 (2021) · low 76 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LPH

4in 2025

2007: 162008: 12009: 22010: 222011: 262012: 302013: 92014: 32015: 12016: 82017: 142018: 22019: 82020: 62021: 42022: 22023: 22024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 30 (2012) · low 1 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LPH

6,163in 2025

2007: 5092008: 7062009: 1,1562010: 2,0072011: 3,3202012: 3,7852013: 5,0022014: 5,1632015: 5,8302016: 4,9002017: 5,3122018: 5,9542019: 7,1302020: 5,4292021: 5,9782022: 5,2232023: 5,3452024: 5,6262025: 6,163
2007high 7,130 (2019) · low 509 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LPH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071011616509
200810861706
2009311221,156
201015100222,007
201116110263,320
20122576303,785
20131113595,002
20142012935,163
20151811115,830
20161015084,900
201712121145,312
2018914525,954
20192216487,130
2020716465,429
2021841045,978
20221424725,223
20231011125,345
202469215,626
20251215346,163
202682562—

What is it indicated for?

The TriFlange Hip Prosthesis is intended to be used with modular liners to resurface the acetabular socket in cementless application during total hip arthroplasty. The TriFlange Hip Prosthesis is indicated in the following conditions: 1. Where bones loss is present in the acetabular region 2. Pelvic discontinuities Porous-coated TriFlange Hip Prostheses are indicated for cementless applications. The system is intended to be used with modular liners to…

Read the full statement (190 words)

The TriFlange Hip Prosthesis is intended to be used with modular liners to resurface the acetabular socket in cementless application during total hip arthroplasty.

The TriFlange Hip Prosthesis is indicated in the following conditions:

1. Where bones loss is present in the acetabular region

2. Pelvic discontinuities

Porous-coated TriFlange Hip Prostheses are indicated for cementless applications.

The system is intended to be used with modular liners to resurface the acetabular socket in cementless application during total hip arthroplasty.

Total hip arthroplasty is intended to provide increased patient mobility and reduce pain by replacing the damaged hip joint articulation in patients where there is evidence of sufficient sound bone to seat and support the components.

Total hip replacement is indicated in the following conditions:

1. A severely painful and/or disabled joint from osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or congenital hip dysplasia.

2. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head.

3. Acute traumatic fracture of the femoral head or neck.

4. Failed previous hip surgery including joint reconstruction, internal fixation, arthrodesis, hemi-arthroplasty, surface replacement arthroplasty, or total hip replacement.

5. Certain cases of ankylosis.

Porous-coated TriFlange Hip Prostheses are indicated for cement-less applications.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K232556: DePuy 3D Additive TriFlange Acetabular Cup and DePuy TriFlange II Acetabular Cup System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K232556

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026