510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

NIDO Baby Magnetic Resonance Imaging System

K242573510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 23, 2024116-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1000

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Jiangsu Lici Medical Device Co., Ltd. · LNH System, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Cleared on Dec 23, 2024 as substantially equivalent to K170978 (Aspect Imaging, Ltd., 2017) and 1 other predicate after a 116-day review. Its family tree reaches back 6 generations to 2000.

Decided
Dec 23, 2024
Review
116 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LNH
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 6 generations to K001773 (2000). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 6 generations backK001773 OrthoneOni, Inc. · 2000 · Recalled
  2. 5 generations backK120701 M2 Wrist Mri SystemAspect Imaging, Ltd. · 2013
  3. 4 generations backK130692 M2 Wrist 2 Mri SystemAspect Imaging, Ltd. · 2014
  4. 3 generations backK160185 Wrist 3Aspect Imaging, Ltd. · 2016
  5. 2 generations backK170978 Embrace Neonatal MRI SystemAspect Imaging, Ltd. · 2017
  6. 1 generation backK192002 Lucy Point-of-Care Magnetic Resonance Imaging DeviceHyperfine Research, Inc. · 2020
  7. This deviceK242573 NIDO Baby Magnetic Resonance Imaging SystemJiangsu Lici Medical Device Co., Ltd. · 2024
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−6K001773OrthoneOni, Inc.20001
−5K120701M2 Wrist Mri SystemAspect Imaging, Ltd.2013—
−4K130692M2 Wrist 2 Mri SystemAspect Imaging, Ltd.2014—
−3K160185Wrist 3Aspect Imaging, Ltd.2016—
−2K170978Embrace Neonatal MRI SystemAspect Imaging, Ltd.2017—
−1K192002Lucy Point-of-Care Magnetic Resonance Imaging DeviceHyperfine Research, Inc.2020—
0 (this device)K242573NIDO Baby Magnetic Resonance Imaging SystemJiangsu Lici Medical Device Co., Ltd.2024—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K242573, 2000–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LNH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LNH device

  1. #1 K213693 MAGNETOM Vida with syngo MR XA50Ascore 23.0 · 18 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K170978Embrace Neonatal MRI System
Summary page 5
…21 CFR 892.1000 Regulation Name: Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic Device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LNH Premarket Notification: K170978 Manufacturer: Aspect Imaging Ltd. IV Predicate Device 2 Trade Name: Lucy Point-of-Care Magnetic Reson…
Aspect Imaging, Ltd.2017—
*K192002Lucy Point-of-Care Magnetic Resonance Imaging Device
Summary page 5
…21 CFR 892.1000 Regulation Name: Magnetic resonance diagnostic device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LNH Premarket Notification: K192002 Manufacturer: Hyperfine Research, Inc. 1 / 7 V Device…
Hyperfine Research, Inc.2020—

Also cleared against K170978: 3 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 24 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.6 years on median.
  • 1 of the 6 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K170978.

How does its category compare?

All LNH devices

LNH System, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2024, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LNH

26in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 172010: 122011: 162012: 222013: 192014: 172015: 192016: 202017: 182018: 292019: 262020: 322021: 272022: 302023: 302024: 262025: 262026 (partial year): 24
2007high 32 (2020) · low 12 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LNH

122in 2025

2007: 35 days median2008: 53 days median2009: 70 days median2010: 94 days median2011: 81 days median2012: 89 days median2013: 108 days median2014: 108 days median2015: 140 days median2016: 108 days median2017: 98 days median2018: 128 days median2019: 62 days median2020: 121 days median2021: 87 days median2022: 74 days median2023: 124 days median2024: 104 days median2025: 122 days median2026 (partial year): 126 days median
2007high 140 (2015) · low 35 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LNH

8in 2025

2007: 252008: 122009: 72010: 172011: 112012: 52013: 22014: 132015: 12, 2 Class I2016: 12018: 712019: 52020: 42021: 412022: 132023: 10, 1 Class I2024: 42025: 8, 5 Class I2026 (partial year): 43
2007high 71 (2018) · low 0 (2017)2026

Class I (8 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LNH

1,263in 2025

2007: 1142008: 1672009: 1942010: 1652011: 1822012: 1702013: 1072014: 1192015: 1132016: 1352017: 1212018: 1582019: 1582020: 982021: 842022: 1382023: 1592024: 2812025: 1,263
2007high 1,263 (2025) · low 84 (2021)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LNH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007123525114
2008195312167
200917707194
2010129417165
2011168111182
201222895170
2013191082107
20141710813119
20151914012 (2)113
2016201081135
201718980121
20182912871158
201926625158
202032121498
202127874184
2022307413138
20233012410 (1)159
2024261044281
2025261228 (5)1,263
20262412643—

What is it indicated for?

The NIDO Baby Magnetic Resonance Imaging System is indicated for use as a magnetic resonance imaging device for producing axial, sagittal, coronal and oblique images that displays the internal structure of neonatal or infant head. When interpreted by a trained physician, these images provide information that can be useful in determining a diagnosis. The NIDO Baby Magnetic Resonance Imaging System is applicable to neonatal or infant head with circumference of up to 50 cm and weight up to 15Kg.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K242573: NIDO Baby Magnetic Resonance Imaging System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K242573

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026