510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System, Acetabular Liners and Constrained Liners

K243571510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 31, 2025255-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3350

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Zimmer Biomet · JDI Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Cemented

Cleared on Jul 31, 2025 as substantially equivalent to K051516 (Zimmer, Inc., 2005) and 1 other predicate after a 255-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1998.

Decided
Jul 31, 2025
Review
255 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JDI
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K983128 (1998). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 3 generations backK983128 Implex Hedrocel Replacement Cup Insert Model Numbers 02-246-Xxyyy…Implex Corp. · 1998 · Recalled
  2. 2 generations backK051516 Trabecular Metal Revision Shell LinersZimmer, Inc. · 2005
  3. 1 generation backK072121 Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System Cemented Contrained LinerZimmer, Inc. · 2008
  4. This deviceK243571 Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System, Acetabular Liners and…Zimmer Biomet · 2025
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K983128Implex Hedrocel Replacement Cup Insert Model Numbers 02-246-Xxyyy…Implex Corp.19981
−2K051516Trabecular Metal Revision Shell LinersZimmer, Inc.2005—
−1K072121Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System Cemented Contrained LinerZimmer, Inc.2008—
0 (this device)K243571Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System, Acetabular Liners and Constrained…Zimmer Biomet2025—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K243571, 1998–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in JDI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new JDI device

  1. #1 K253515 Zimmer Biomet OSS™ Orthopedic Salvage System…score 15.2 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K051516Trabecular Metal Revision Shell Liners
Summary page 5
…oint metal/polymer constrained cemented or uncemented prosthesis (21 CFR 888.3310) Predicate Device(s): Primary Predicate 510(k): K051516 Predicate Trade Name: Trabecular Metal Revision Shell Liners Product…
Zimmer, Inc.2005—
*K072121Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System Cemented Contrained Liner
Summary page 5
…Predicate Trade Name: Trabecular Metal Revision Shell Liners Product Code: JDI Additional Predicate 510(k): K072121 Predicate Trade Name: Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System Cem…
Zimmer, Inc.2008—

Also cleared against K051516: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 27 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6.6 years on median.
  • 1 of the 3 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K051516.

How does its category compare?

All JDI devices

JDI Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Cemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2025, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · JDI

1in 2025

2007: 32008: 52009: 32011: 22012: 42013: 32014: 32015: 32016: 42017: 12018: 12019: 22020: 72021: 32022: 32023: 22024: 32025: 12026 (partial year): 2
2007high 7 (2020) · low 0 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · JDI

59in 2024

2007: 81 days median2008: 96 days median2009: 65 days median2012: 167 days median2013: 176 days median2014: 98 days median2015: 190 days median2016: 166 days median2020: 247 days median2021: 162 days median2022: 69 days median2024: 59 days median
2007high 247 (2020) · low 59 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · JDI

1in 2025

2007: 262008: 62009: 32010: 32011: 52012: 42013: 112014: 32015: 12016: 52017: 52018: 12019: 12020: 772025: 1
2007high 77 (2020) · low 0 (2021)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · JDI

1,644in 2025

2007: 6962008: 8102009: 9642010: 2,0402011: 3,1602012: 5,1222013: 5,2062014: 4,9682015: 4,9062016: 3,9952017: 6,1352018: 6,7282019: 7,4072020: 4,0152021: 3,1702022: 1,9782023: 1,6352024: 1,8212025: 1,644
2007high 7,407 (2019) · low 696 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JDI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200738126696
20085966810
20093653964
20100—32,040
20112—53,160
2012416745,122
20133176115,206
201439834,968
2015319014,906
2016416653,995
20171—56,135
20181—16,728
20192—17,407
20207247774,015
2021316203,170
202236901,978
20232—01,635
202435901,821
20251—11,644
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

Acetabular Liners: The Trabecular Metal™ Revision Shell Liner is indicated for cemented use in the Trabecular Metal Revision Shell for initial placement or as an in situ replacement polyethylene bearing surface for joint instability, wear and/or damage. Constrained Liners: The Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System Cemented Constrained Liner is intended to be cemented into a Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System shell; the shell is intended…

Read the full statement (134 words)

Acetabular Liners:

The Trabecular Metal™ Revision Shell Liner is indicated for cemented use in the Trabecular Metal Revision Shell for initial placement or as an in situ replacement polyethylene bearing surface for joint instability, wear and/or damage.

Constrained Liners:

The Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System Cemented Constrained Liner is intended to be cemented into a Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System shell; the shell is intended for cementless fixation into the acetabulum. The Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System Cemented Constrained Liner is indicated for use as a component of a total hip prosthesis in complex primary or revision patients at high risk of hip dislocation due to a history of prior dislocation, bone loss, soft tissue laxity, neuromuscular disease, or intraoperative instability and for whom all other options to constrained acetabular components have been considered.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K243571: Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System, Acetabular Liners and Constrained Liners.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K243571

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026