510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

BioBrace ® RC Delivery System

K250395510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 7, 202554-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.3300

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Conmed Corporation · ORQ Mesh, Surgical, Deployer

Cleared on Apr 7, 2025 as substantially equivalent to K241906 (Conmed Corporation, 2024) after a 54-day review. Its family tree reaches back 13 generations to 1992.

Decided
Apr 7, 2025
Review
54 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ORQ
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 13 generations to K921895 (1992). 40 ancestors in all, the oldest K810428 (1981). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 13 generations backK921895 Tissue Patch, Tissue GraftBio-Vascular, Inc. · 1992
  2. 9 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK121216 STR GraftSoft Tissue Regeneration, Inc. · 2012
  4. 2 generations backK203267 The BioBrace ImplantBiorez, Inc. · 2021
  5. 1 generation backK241906 BioBrace® Reinforced ImplantConmed Corporation · 2024
  6. This deviceK250395 BioBrace ® RC Delivery SystemConmed Corporation · 2025
Show all 13 generations
  1. Root · 13 generations backK921895 Tissue Patch, Tissue GraftBio-Vascular, Inc. · 1992
  2. 12 generations backK961810 Supple Peri-Guard PericardiumBio-Vascular, Inc. · 1996
  3. 11 generations backK980431 SurgisisCook Biotech, Inc. · 1998
  4. 10 generations backK992159 Surgisis SlingCook Biotech, Inc. · 1999
  5. 9 generations backK001738 Depuy Restore Orthobiologic Soft Tissue ImplantDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2000
  6. 8 generations backK020049 Fortaflex Surgical MeshOrganogenesis, Inc. · 2002
  7. 7 generations backK042809 CuffpatchOrganogenesis, Inc. · 2004
  8. 6 generations backK052830 SportmeshArtimplant AB · 2006
  9. 5 generations backK071887 Sportmesh or Artelon Tissue ReinforcementArtimplant AB · 2007
  10. 4 generations backK083307 Synthasome X-RepairSynthasome, Inc. · 2009
  11. 3 generations backK121216 STR GraftSoft Tissue Regeneration, Inc. · 2012
  12. 2 generations backK203267 The BioBrace ImplantBiorez, Inc. · 2021
  13. 1 generation backK241906 BioBrace® Reinforced ImplantConmed Corporation · 2024
  14. This deviceK250395 BioBrace ® RC Delivery SystemConmed Corporation · 2025
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−13K921895Tissue Patch, Tissue GraftBio-Vascular, Inc.1992—
−12K961810Supple Peri-Guard PericardiumBio-Vascular, Inc.1996—
−11K980431SurgisisCook Biotech, Inc.1998—
−10K992159Surgisis SlingCook Biotech, Inc.1999—
−9K001738Depuy Restore Orthobiologic Soft Tissue ImplantDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.2000—
−8K020049Fortaflex Surgical MeshOrganogenesis, Inc.2002—
−7K042809CuffpatchOrganogenesis, Inc.2004—
−6K052830SportmeshArtimplant AB2006—
−5K071887Sportmesh or Artelon Tissue ReinforcementArtimplant AB2007—
−4K083307Synthasome X-RepairSynthasome, Inc.2009—
−3K121216STR GraftSoft Tissue Regeneration, Inc.2012—
−2K203267The BioBrace ImplantBiorez, Inc.2021—
−1K241906BioBrace® Reinforced ImplantConmed Corporation2024—
0 (this device)K250395BioBrace ® RC Delivery SystemConmed Corporation2025—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198110
198310
198510
198810
199130
199210
199310
199630
199710
199860
200010
200110
200210
200310
200410
200510
200610
200710
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K250395, 1992–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ORQ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K241906BioBrace® Reinforced Implant
Summary page 5
…ulation Name: Surgical Mesh Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OWW, OWY 510K#: K241906 K250395 Page 2/3 IV. DEVICE DESCR…
Conmed Corporation2024—

Also cleared against K241906: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 33 years and passes through 9 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.7 years on median.
  • 1 of the 40 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K241906.

How does its category compare?

All ORQ devices

ORQ Mesh, Surgical, Deployer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2025, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · ORQ

1in 2025

2010: 22012: 22013: 12025: 1
2007high 2 (2010) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ORQ

Too few ORQ 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · ORQ

No recall names ORQ since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · ORQ

11in 2025

2014: 12015: 12016: 102017: 102019: 42020: 12021: 52022: 22023: 12025: 11
2007high 11 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ORQ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20102—00
20110—00
20122—00
20131—00
20140—01
20150—01
20160—010
20170—010
20180—00
20190—04
20200—01
20210—05
20220—02
20230—01
20240—00
20251—011
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The BioBrace® RC Delivery System is intended for use in rotator cuff surgical procedures for reinforcement of soft tissue where weakness exists. The BioBrace® Implant is intended for reinforcement of soft tissues that are repaired by suture or suture anchors, during rotator cuff tendon repair surgery. The BioBrace® Implant is not intended to replace normal body structures or provide the full mechanical strength to support the rotator cuff. Sutures used…

Read the full statement (111 words)

The BioBrace® RC Delivery System is intended for use in rotator cuff surgical procedures for reinforcement of soft tissue where weakness exists. The BioBrace® Implant is intended for reinforcement of soft tissues that are repaired by suture or suture anchors, during rotator cuff tendon repair surgery. The BioBrace® Implant is not intended to replace normal body structures or provide the full mechanical strength to support the rotator cuff. Sutures used to repair the tear, and sutures or bone anchors used to attach the tissue to bone, provide mechanical strength for the tendon repair.

The Disposable Inserter is intended to facilitate the delivery and positioning of the implant during soft tissue repairs.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K250395: BioBrace ® RC Delivery System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K250395

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026