510(k) · Cleared
ClearedEMPOWR Revision Knee™ (EMPOWR Revision Knee™ Symmetric TT Cones)
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Encore Medical L.P. · JWH Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer
Cleared on Jul 2, 2025 as substantially equivalent to K240324 (Encore Medical, L.P. (Dba Enovis), 2024) and 1 other predicate after a 71-day review. Its family tree reaches back 12 generations to 1981.
- Decided
- Jul 2, 2025
- Review
- 71 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- JWH
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 2
Its longest line of descent runs back 12 generations to K810258 (1981). 72 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 12 generations backK810258 Proximal Fermoral Hip ReplacementBiomet, Inc. · 1981
- 8 generations between
- 3 generations backK160342 EMPOWR PS Knee SystemEncore Medical L.P. · 2016 · Recalled
- 2 generations backK180930 Empowr VVC Tibial InsertEncore Medical L.P. · 2018 · Recalled
- 1 generation backK230169 EMPOWR Revision VVC+ (Varus / Valgus Constrained), e+ Tibial InsertEncore Medical, L.P Dba Enovis · 2023
- This deviceK251241 EMPOWR Revision Knee™ (EMPOWR Revision Knee™ Symmetric TT Cones)Encore Medical L.P. · 2025
Show all 12 generations
- Root · 12 generations backK810258 Proximal Fermoral Hip ReplacementBiomet, Inc. · 1981
- 11 generations backK974558 Salvage/Onocology Hip and Total Femur SystemBiomet, Inc. · 1998
- 10 generations backK032396 Ringloc 36MM Line and Modular Femoral HeadsBiomet, Inc. · 2003 · Recalled
- 9 generations backK050327 E-Poly (Vitamin E) Acetabular LinersBiomet, Inc. · 2005
- 8 generations backK070364 100KGY E-Poly Maxrom Acetabular LinersBiomet, Inc. · 2007
- 7 generations backK080528 E-Poly Tibial BearingsBiomet Orthopedics, Inc. · 2008
- 6 generations backK091956 Highly Cross-Linked Vitamin E Uhmwpe Tibial Inserts, Model…Encore Medical L.P. · 2010 · Recalled
- 5 generations backK121727 Movation Knee SystemEncore Medical L.P. · 2012
- 4 generations backK143242 Rebel 3DKNEE SystemEncore Medical L.P. · 2015 · Recalled
- 3 generations backK160342 EMPOWR PS Knee SystemEncore Medical L.P. · 2016 · Recalled
- 2 generations backK180930 Empowr VVC Tibial InsertEncore Medical L.P. · 2018 · Recalled
- 1 generation backK230169 EMPOWR Revision VVC+ (Varus / Valgus Constrained), e+ Tibial InsertEncore Medical, L.P Dba Enovis · 2023
- This deviceK251241 EMPOWR Revision Knee™ (EMPOWR Revision Knee™ Symmetric TT Cones)Encore Medical L.P. · 2025
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −12 | K810258 | Proximal Fermoral Hip Replacement | Biomet, Inc. | 1981 | — |
| −11 | K974558 | Salvage/Onocology Hip and Total Femur System | Biomet, Inc. | 1998 | — |
| −10 | K032396 | Ringloc 36MM Line and Modular Femoral Heads | Biomet, Inc. | 2003 | 3 |
| −9 | K050327 | E-Poly (Vitamin E) Acetabular Liners | Biomet, Inc. | 2005 | — |
| −8 | K070364 | 100KGY E-Poly Maxrom Acetabular Liners | Biomet, Inc. | 2007 | — |
| −7 | K080528 | E-Poly Tibial Bearings | Biomet Orthopedics, Inc. | 2008 | — |
| −6 | K091956 | Highly Cross-Linked Vitamin E Uhmwpe Tibial Inserts, Model 391/392-09_19-702_712 | Encore Medical L.P. | 2010 | 4 |
| −5 | K121727 | Movation Knee System | Encore Medical L.P. | 2012 | — |
| −4 | K143242 | Rebel 3DKNEE System | Encore Medical L.P. | 2015 | 17 |
| −3 | K160342 | EMPOWR PS Knee System | Encore Medical L.P. | 2016 | 5 |
| −2 | K180930 | Empowr VVC Tibial Insert | Encore Medical L.P. | 2018 | 1 |
| −1 | K230169 | EMPOWR Revision VVC+ (Varus / Valgus Constrained), e+ Tibial Insert | Encore Medical, L.P Dba Enovis | 2023 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K251241 | EMPOWR Revision Knee™ (EMPOWR Revision Knee™ Symmetric TT Cones) | Encore Medical L.P. | 2025 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1981 | 1 | 0 |
| 1984 | 1 | 0 |
| 1991 | 1 | 0 |
| 1992 | 3 | 0 |
| 1993 | 2 | 0 |
| 1994 | 7 | 0 |
| 1995 | 7 | 0 |
| 1996 | 1 | 0 |
| 1997 | 2 | 0 |
| 1998 | 5 | 0 |
| 2000 | 2 | 0 |
| 2001 | 2 | 0 |
| 2002 | 2 | 0 |
| 2003 | 4 | 0 |
| 2004 | 5 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2 | 0 |
| 2007 | 1 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1 | 0 |
| 2020 | 1 | 0 |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in JWH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new JWH device
- #1 K221479 Persona Personalized Knee Systemscore 22.4 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (2)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K240324 | EMPOWR Revision Symmetric Knee ConesSummary page 5…gulatory Class: II Primary Product Code: JWH Secondary Product Code: MBH III. PREDICATE / REFERENCE DEVICES Predicate (primary): EMPOWR Revision Knee™ Symmetric Cones (K240324) Predicate (secondary): EMPOWR Revision VVC+, e+ Tibial Insert (K230169) Reference: AMF TT Cones (K200653) IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTI… | 2024 |
| * | K230169 | EMPOWR Revision VVC+ (Varus / Valgus Constrained), e+ Tibial InsertSummary page 5…III. PREDICATE / REFERENCE DEVICES Predicate (primary): EMPOWR Revision Knee™ Symmetric Cones (K240324) Predicate (secondary): EMPOWR Revision VVC+, e+ Tibial Insert (K230169) Reference: AMF TT Cones (K200653) IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION The EMPOWR Revision Knee™ Symmetric TT (Trabecular Titanium) Cones a… | 2023 |
| † | K200653 | AMF Revision TT Cones | 2020 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 44 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.2 years on median.
- 29 of the 72 ancestors have a recall of any class.
How does its category compare?
All JWH devicesJWH Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2025, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · JWH
20in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · JWH
55in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · JWH
2in 2025
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · JWH
9,306in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code JWH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 18 | 74 | 14 | 1,305 |
| 2008 | 17 | 81 | 10 | 1,483 |
| 2009 | 11 | 168 | 109 | 1,870 |
| 2010 | 19 | 85 | 32 | 3,286 |
| 2011 | 25 | 87 | 27 | 5,133 |
| 2012 | 33 | 85 | 85 | 5,203 |
| 2013 | 31 | 128 | 31 | 6,135 |
| 2014 | 33 | 98 | 13 | 6,722 |
| 2015 | 27 | 87 | 11 | 6,881 |
| 2016 | 18 | 88 | 17 | 7,586 |
| 2017 | 25 | 118 | 61 | 12,263 |
| 2018 | 25 | 90 | 14 | 14,071 |
| 2019 | 28 | 133 | 5 | 14,987 |
| 2020 | 22 | 59 | 2 | 12,592 |
| 2021 | 24 | 61 | 8 | 9,408 |
| 2022 | 17 | 56 | 12 | 8,364 |
| 2023 | 20 | 57 | 67 | 8,947 |
| 2024 | 19 | 89 | 7 | 10,828 |
| 2025 | 20 | 55 | 2 | 9,306 |
| 2026 | 12 | 63 | 4 | — |
What is it indicated for?
Total joint replacement is indicated for patients suffering from disability due to: • degenerative, post-traumatic or rheumatoid arthritis; • avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle; • post-traumatic loss of joint configuration, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, dysfunction or prior patellectomy; • moderate valgus, varus or flexion deformities; • treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques. This device may also…
Read the full statement (166 words)
Total joint replacement is indicated for patients suffering from disability due to:
• degenerative, post-traumatic or rheumatoid arthritis;
• avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle;
• post-traumatic loss of joint configuration, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, dysfunction or prior patellectomy;
• moderate valgus, varus or flexion deformities;
• treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques.
This device may also be indicated in the salvage of previously failed surgical attempts where bone loss may require the use of augments, sleeves cones or extensions.
The EMPOWR Revision Knee™ Symmetric TT Cones are indicated for the following conditions:
• EMPOWR Revision Knee™ Symmetric TT Cones are indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with bone defect or poor bone quality (osteoporotic bone) or in case of sclerotic bone that requires supplemental fixation in the clinical judgment of the surgeon.
• EMPOWR Revision Knee™ Symmetric TT Cones are indicated for uncemented fixation to the bone and are fixed to the femoral and tibial implants using bone cement.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K251241 · printed Nov 4, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K251241: EMPOWR Revision Knee™ (EMPOWR Revision Knee™ Symmetric TT Cones).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K251241
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026