510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class I · 2019

Sheridan/HVT,CF, Uncuffed

K822082510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 10, 198229-day reviewClass II21 CFR 868.5730Recalls 27 (17 Class I)

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Sheridan Catheter Corp. · BTR Tube, Tracheal (W/Wo Connector)

Cleared on Aug 10, 1982 after a 29-day review. FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known. 3 of the 23 devices in its family, counting itself, have a Class I recall. 22 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 27 times, including 17 Class I recalls.

Decided
Aug 10, 1982
Review
29 days
Class
Class II
Product code
BTR
Recalls
27 (17 Class I)
Predicates
0

22 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly. 3 of the 23 devices in this family, counting this one, have a Class I recall.

Descendants, by year cleared 1999: 1 descendant cleared2009: 3 descendants cleared, 1 with a Class I recall12014: 1 descendant cleared2005: 1 descendant cleared2010: 3 descendants cleared2008: 1 descendant cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2012: 2 descendants cleared2016: 2 descendants cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2018: 2 descendants cleared2020: 1 descendant cleared, 1 with a Class I recall12025: 1 descendant cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared2024: 1 descendant cleared19801990200020102020
  1. This deviceK822082 Sheridan/HVT,CF, UncuffedSheridan Catheter Corp. · 1982
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 18 of its ownK984528 Parker Flex-Tip Tracheal TubeParker Medical Assoc. · 1999 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 16 of its ownK052233 Tracheoscopic Ventilation Tube (TVT) SystemEtview, Ltd. · 2005
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 14 of its ownK082420 Tracheoscopic Ventilation Tube (TVT)Etview · 2008
  5. Descendant · 4 generations on · 4 of its ownK113576 Double Lumen Video Tracheosdope (DLVT) SystemEtview, Ltd. · 2012
  6. Descendant · 5 generations on · 3 of its ownK123853 Vivasight-DL SystemEtview, Ltd. · 2013

Showing 5 of 22 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

1999: 12005: 12008: 12009: 32010: 32012: 22013: 12014: 12016: 22018: 22019: 12020: 12021: 12024: 12025: 1
1999high 3 (2009) · low 0 (2000)2026

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 22 · See all
  • K984528Parker Flex-Tip Tracheal TubeParker Medical Assoc. · 1999 · cites it directly18descendants
  • K052233Tracheoscopic Ventilation Tube (TVT) SystemEtview, Ltd. · 2005 · 2 generations on16descendants
  • K082420Tracheoscopic Ventilation Tube (TVT)Etview · 2008 · 3 generations on14descendants
  • K113576Double Lumen Video Tracheosdope (DLVT) SystemEtview, Ltd. · 2012 · 4 generations on4descendants
  • K123853Vivasight-DL SystemEtview, Ltd. · 2013 · 5 generations on3descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K822082Sheridan/HVT,CF, UncuffedSheridan Catheter Corp.1982—
+1K984528Parker Flex-Tip Tracheal TubeParker Medical Assoc.19991
+2K052233Tracheoscopic Ventilation Tube (TVT) SystemEtview, Ltd.2005—
+3K082420Tracheoscopic Ventilation Tube (TVT)Etview2008—
+4K113576Double Lumen Video Tracheosdope (DLVT) SystemEtview, Ltd.2012—
+5K123853Vivasight-DL SystemEtview, Ltd.2013—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199910
200510
200810
200931
201030
201220
201310
201410
201620
201820
201910
202011
202110
202410
202510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K822082, 1982–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

3 devices in this family have a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new BTR device

  1. #1 K251794 Tenax® Laser Resistant Endotracheal Tubescore 12.5 · 3 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it? (22)

See all 22

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K984528Parker Flex-Tip Tracheal TubeParker Medical Assoc.199918
K091761Teleflex Isis HVT Tracheal Tube, Cuffed, with Subglottic Secretion Suction Port Class ITeleflexmedical, Inc.20092

Has anything in its family been recalled? (3 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jul 30, 2019Class IZ-2313-2019Process controlReported complaints indicate an increased incidence of specific lots of the 15 mm Sheridan connector becoming disconnected from the endotracheal tube (ETT). Disconnection from the breathing circuit may result in insufficient oxygenation…
Jul 30, 2019Class IZ-2316-2019Process controlReported complaints indicate an increased incidence of specific lots of the 15 mm Sheridan connector becoming disconnected from the endotracheal tube (ETT). Disconnection from the breathing circuit may result in insufficient oxygenation…
Jul 30, 2019Class IZ-2312-2019Process controlReported complaints indicate an increased incidence of specific lots of the 15 mm Sheridan connector becoming disconnected from the endotracheal tube (ETT). Disconnection from the breathing circuit may result in insufficient oxygenation…
Jul 30, 2019Class IZ-2317-2019Process controlReported complaints indicate an increased incidence of specific lots of the 15 mm Sheridan connector becoming disconnected from the endotracheal tube (ETT). Disconnection from the breathing circuit may result in insufficient oxygenation…
Jul 30, 2019Class IZ-2318-2019Process controlReported complaints indicate an increased incidence of specific lots of the 15 mm Sheridan connector becoming disconnected from the endotracheal tube (ETT). Disconnection from the breathing circuit may result in insufficient oxygenation…
Jul 30, 2019Class IZ-2311-2019Process controlReported complaints indicate an increased incidence of specific lots of the 15 mm Sheridan connector becoming disconnected from the endotracheal tube (ETT). Disconnection from the breathing circuit may result in insufficient oxygenation…
Jul 30, 2019Class IZ-2315-2019Process controlReported complaints indicate an increased incidence of specific lots of the 15 mm Sheridan connector becoming disconnected from the endotracheal tube (ETT). Disconnection from the breathing circuit may result in insufficient oxygenation…
Jul 30, 2019Class IZ-2314-2019Process controlReported complaints indicate an increased incidence of specific lots of the 15 mm Sheridan connector becoming disconnected from the endotracheal tube (ETT). Disconnection from the breathing circuit may result in insufficient oxygenation…
Jun 7, 2019Class IZ-1956-2019Device DesignCenturion is conducting a sub-recall for Teleflex Sheridan branded Endotracheal Tracheal Tubes due to increased incidence of Sheridan connector becoming disconnected from Endotracheal Tube.
May 24, 2019Class IZ-1766-2019Process controlThis voluntary recall is due to reported complaints (<0.0025% of all in scope distributed product) indicating that there is an increased incidence of specific lots of the 15 mm Sheridan connector becoming disconnected from the…
May 24, 2019Class IZ-1762-2019Process controlThis voluntary recall is due to reported complaints (<0.0025% of all in scope distributed product) indicating that there is an increased incidence of specific lots of the 15 mm Sheridan connector becoming disconnected from the…
May 24, 2019Class IZ-1760-2019Process controlThis voluntary recall is due to reported complaints (<0.0025% of all in scope distributed product) indicating that there is an increased incidence of specific lots of the 15 mm Sheridan connector becoming disconnected from the…
May 24, 2019Class IZ-1765-2019Process controlThis voluntary recall is due to reported complaints (<0.0025% of all in scope distributed product) indicating that there is an increased incidence of specific lots of the 15 mm Sheridan connector becoming disconnected from the…
May 24, 2019Class IZ-1759-2019Process controlThis voluntary recall is due to reported complaints (<0.0025% of all in scope distributed product) indicating that there is an increased incidence of specific lots of the 15 mm Sheridan connector becoming disconnected from the…
May 24, 2019Class IZ-1761-2019Process controlThis voluntary recall is due to reported complaints (<0.0025% of all in scope distributed product) indicating that there is an increased incidence of specific lots of the 15 mm Sheridan connector becoming disconnected from the…
May 24, 2019Class IZ-1763-2019Process controlThis voluntary recall is due to reported complaints (<0.0025% of all in scope distributed product) indicating that there is an increased incidence of specific lots of the 15 mm Sheridan connector becoming disconnected from the…
May 24, 2019Class IZ-1764-2019Process controlThis voluntary recall is due to reported complaints (<0.0025% of all in scope distributed product) indicating that there is an increased incidence of specific lots of the 15 mm Sheridan connector becoming disconnected from the…
Oct 18, 2016Class IIZ-1177-2017OtherLabeling inconsistency - units labeled with a 7mm tube may contain a size 6.5mm tube, and units labeled 7.5mm tube may contain a size 5.5mm tube.
May 5, 2016Class IIZ-1938-2016Error in labelingThe labeling of some units indicates that it contains a size 7mm tracheal tube, but may contain a size 7.5mm tracheal tube.
Jan 9, 2015Class IIZ-1078-2015Labeling mix-upsLabeling; The affected product packaging is incorrectly labeled as being a cuffed oral ET tube; The correct product labeling is uncuffed nasal ET tube.
Nov 12, 2014Class IIZ-0799-2015Process controlProduct Labeling; Units from the affected lot indicates that it contains a size 8mm tracheal tube but may contain a size 7.5mm tracheal tube.
Jul 6, 2009Not classifiedZ-1890-2009Process controlThe Nasal Preformed Tracheal Tubes were found to have incorrect insertion depth mark printings.
Jul 6, 2009Not classifiedZ-1891-2009Process controlThe Nasal Preformed Tracheal Tubes were found to have incorrect insertion depth mark printings.
Sep 27, 2006Not classifiedZ-0126-2007OtherBiological indicator failed. Investigation eliminated all equipment and product related factors.
Sep 27, 2006Not classifiedZ-0128-2007OtherBiological indicator failed. Investigation eliminated all equipment and product related factors.
Sep 27, 2006Not classifiedZ-0127-2007OtherBiological indicator failed. Investigation eliminated all equipment and product related factors.
Jan 14, 2005Not classifiedZ-0582-05OtherSome of the primary labels have the internal diameter (ID) and outer diameter (OD) numbers reversed, i.e. ID 10.9 mm and OD 8.0 mm instead of the actual ID 8.0 and OD 10.9 mm, mislabeling the size of the tracheal tube.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K091761Teleflex Isis HVT Tracheal Tube, Cuffed, with Subglottic Secretion Suction PortTeleflexmedical, Inc. · 2009 · Cites it directly · ◆ in the 2009 descendants bar of FIG. 115 Class I recalls
  • K193058SonarMed AirWave Airway Monitoring SystemSonarmed, Inc. · 2020 · 6 generations on · ◆ in the 2020 descendants bar of FIG. 14 Class I recalls

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K984528 (Parker Medical Assoc., 1999) has gone furthest, with 18 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All BTR devices

BTR Tube, Tracheal (W/Wo Connector): FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · BTR

7in 2025

2007: 12008: 72009: 72010: 32011: 22012: 52013: 12014: 32015: 32016: 12017: 22018: 52019: 52020: 32021: 12022: 12023: 12024: 12025: 72026 (partial year): 2
2007high 7 (2008) · low 1 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · BTR

258in 2025

2008: 61 days median2009: 135 days median2010: 179 days median2012: 261 days median2014: 308 days median2015: 262 days median2018: 242 days median2019: 211 days median2020: 246 days median2025: 258 days median
2007high 308 (2014) · low 61 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · BTR

3in 2022

2007: 22009: 212014: 20, 19 Class I2016: 12020: 1, 1 Class I2021: 22022: 32026 (partial year): 1
2007high 21 (2009) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (20 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · BTR

1,799in 2025

2007: 1362008: 1692009: 1552010: 3352011: 4222012: 5112013: 8072014: 9852015: 1,0162016: 8362017: 8122018: 9772019: 1,3792020: 1,0702021: 1,3292022: 1,1322023: 1,3302024: 1,6782025: 1,799
2007high 1,799 (2025) · low 136 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code BTR, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—2136
20087610169
2009713521155
201031790335
20112—0422
201252610511
20131—0807
2014330820 (19)985
2015326201,016
20161—1836
20172—0812
201852420977
2019521101,379
202032461 (1)1,070
20211—21,329
20221—31,132
20231—01,330
20241—01,678
2025725801,799
20262—1—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K822082: Sheridan/HVT,CF, Uncuffed.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K822082

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026