510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Verimed Myoexorciser Iii (Myo Iii)

K892649510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 13, 1989245-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.5050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Verimed Holdings, Inc. · HCC Device, Biofeedback

Cleared on Dec 13, 1989 after a 245-day review. FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known. 12 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Dec 13, 1989
Review
245 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HCC
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

12 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 1997: 2 descendants cleared2006: 1 descendant cleared2007: 1 descendant cleared2008: 2 descendants cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2015: 2 descendants cleared2009: 1 descendant cleared2024: 1 descendant cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared1990200020102020
  1. This deviceK892649 Verimed Myoexorciser Iii (Myo Iii)Verimed Holdings, Inc. · 1989
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 10 of its ownK972487 Emg RetrainerChattanooga Group, Inc. · 1997
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 8 of its ownK053223 Triton/Tru-Trac/TX/Triton DTS TractionChattanooga Group · 2006
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 1 of its ownK151640 Eltrac 471Enraf-Nonius, B.V. · 2015
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 0 of its ownK214037 Ergo-Flex Technologies Back on Trac (BOTGEN1) and Cervi-TracErgo-Flex Technologies, LLC · 2024
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 0 of its ownK222912 c1TracZimmer Medizinsysteme GmbH · 2023

Showing 5 of 12 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

1997: 22006: 12007: 12008: 22009: 12010: 12015: 22023: 12024: 1
1997high 2 (1997) · low 0 (1998)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 12 · See all
  • K972487Emg RetrainerChattanooga Group, Inc. · 1997 · cites it directly10descendants
  • K053223Triton/Tru-Trac/TX/Triton DTS TractionChattanooga Group · 2006 · 2 generations on8descendants
  • K151640Eltrac 471Enraf-Nonius, B.V. · 2015 · 3 generations on1descendant
  • K214037Ergo-Flex Technologies Back on Trac (BOTGEN1) and Cervi-TracErgo-Flex Technologies, LLC · 2024 · 3 generations on0descendants
  • K222912c1TracZimmer Medizinsysteme GmbH · 2023 · 4 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K892649Verimed Myoexorciser Iii (Myo Iii)Verimed Holdings, Inc.1989—
+1K972487Emg RetrainerChattanooga Group, Inc.1997—
+2K053223Triton/Tru-Trac/TX/Triton DTS TractionChattanooga Group2006—
+3K151640Eltrac 471Enraf-Nonius, B.V.2015—
+3K214037Ergo-Flex Technologies Back on Trac (BOTGEN1) and Cervi-TracErgo-Flex Technologies, LLC2024—
+4K222912c1TracZimmer Medizinsysteme GmbH2023—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199720
200610
200710
200820
200910
201010
201520
202310
202410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K892649, 1989–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HCC? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HCC device

  1. #1 K233580 A Breathing System (ABS)score 8.1 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it? (12)

See all 12

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K972487Emg RetrainerChattanooga Group, Inc.199710
K971527Innosense Pelvic Floor Stimulation and Electromyography SystemEmpi19970

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K972487 (Chattanooga Group, Inc., 1997) has gone furthest, with 10 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All HCC devices

HCC Device, Biofeedback: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · HCC

1in 2024

2007: 12008: 22010: 12011: 12013: 22015: 22017: 12018: 12023: 12024: 1
2007high 2 (2008) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HCC

Too few HCC 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · HCC

1in 2015

2012: 12015: 1
2007high 1 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HCC

5in 2024

2007: 22008: 22009: 12011: 42012: 22013: 22014: 22016: 42017: 32018: 12019: 62020: 22022: 32023: 22024: 5
2007high 6 (2019) · low 0 (2010)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HCC, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—02
20082—02
20090—01
20101—00
20111—04
20120—12
20132—02
20140—02
20152—10
20160—04
20171—03
20181—01
20190—06
20200—02
20210—00
20220—03
20231—02
20241—05
20250—00
20260—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K892649: Verimed Myoexorciser Iii (Myo Iii).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K892649

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026