510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · 2006

R2 Pace Pad, Model 480

K895729510(k) TraditionalCleared Oct 12, 198917-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.5550Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Darox Corp. · DRO Pacemaker, Cardiac, External Transcutaneous (Non-Invasive)

Cleared on Oct 12, 1989 after a 17-day review. FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Oct 12, 1989
Review
17 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DRO
Recalls
1
Predicates
0

FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known.

FIG. 1 — Lineage of K895729Source: FDA 510(k) database · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DRO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
May 18, 2006Not classifiedZ-1241-06Device DesignThe tinfoil in the triangle electrodes has the potential to develop cracks which may hinder electrical flow and product performance during defibrillation.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All DRO devices

DRO Pacemaker, Cardiac, External Transcutaneous (Non-Invasive): FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DRO

FDA has decided no DRO device since 2007.

Median 510(k) review, days · DRO

Too few DRO 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · DRO

12in 2020

2010: 12014: 4, 4 Class I2020: 12
2007high 12 (2020) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (4 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DRO

2in 2025

2007: 72008: 52009: 32010: 72011: 32012: 82013: 112014: 22015: 412016: 492017: 152018: 642019: 932020: 192021: 222023: 62024: 42025: 2
2007high 93 (2019) · low 0 (2022)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DRO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—07
20080—05
20090—03
20100—17
20110—03
20120—08
20130—011
20140—4 (4)2
20150—041
20160—049
20170—015
20180—064
20190—093
20200—1219
20210—022
20220—00
20230—06
20240—04
20250—02
20260—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K895729: R2 Pace Pad, Model 480.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K895729

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026