510(k) Report

FDA product code · Neurology

Human Lyophilized Dura Mater

LEMClass II21 CFR 882.5975510(k) required2 decisions since 19920 recalls

2 FDA decisions since 1992. No recall names this code. The most-cited predicate is K910555, named by 2 later devices.

Cber review required - previously regulated as a device under 21 cfr 882.5975, now regulated in cber under section 361 as banked human tissue. See definition at §1271.3(d). Subject to donor eligibility, good tissue practice, registration and listing requirements under part 1271" the good tissue practice regulation http://www.Fda.Gov/cber/rules/gtp.Pdf became final effective may 25, 2005. It states that "on january…

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026 Download the data (CSV)

FIG. A — Illustration, neurology panel

Twenty years of LEM at a glance: how often FDA decides these devices, how long 510(k) reviews take, how often they are recalled, and how many adverse event reports name the code.

FDA decisions per year · LEM

FDA has decided no LEM device since 2007.

Median 510(k) review, days · LEM

Too few LEM 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · LEM

No recall names LEM since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · LEM

No MAUDE report names LEM since 2007.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—
FIG. 1 — LEM by year, 2007–2026Sources: FDA decision databases, recall and enforcement reports, MAUDE · Data through Oct 25, 2026

Planning a device in LEM? A 510(k) Report ranks candidate predicates in this code by lineage, citations and recall history, with the review-time outlook.

See the 510(k) Report