510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Biofeedback System/3

K914920510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 16, 1992378-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.5050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Davicon, Inc. · HCC Device, Biofeedback

Cleared on Nov 16, 1992 after a 378-day review. FDA lists a 510(k) statement for it but has not posted the file, so its predicates are not known. 6 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Nov 16, 1992
Review
378 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HCC
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

6 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2002: 1 descendant cleared2003: 1 descendant cleared2004: 1 descendant cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2018: 1 descendant cleared1990200020102020
  1. This deviceK914920 Biofeedback System/3Davicon, Inc. · 1992
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 4 of its ownK022719 Physical Monitoring Registration UnitMaryrose Cusimano, Ph.D./Phil Reaston · 2002
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 2 of its ownK031995 Comprehensive Neuromuscular ProfilerMedical Technologies Unlimited, Inc. · 2004
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 1 of its ownK113074 Cmap ProMedical Technologies, Inc. · 2012
  5. Descendant · 4 generations on · 0 of its ownK173510 BioStamp nPointMc10, Inc. · 2018
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK123902 Physical Monitoring Registration Unit-S (Pmru-S)Oktx, LLC · 2013

Showing 5 of 6 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2002: 12003: 12004: 12012: 12013: 12018: 1
2002high 1 (2002) · low 0 (2005)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 6 · See all
  • K022719Physical Monitoring Registration UnitMaryrose Cusimano, Ph.D./Phil Reaston · 2002 · cites it directly4descendants
  • K031995Comprehensive Neuromuscular ProfilerMedical Technologies Unlimited, Inc. · 2004 · 2 generations on2descendants
  • K113074Cmap ProMedical Technologies, Inc. · 2012 · 3 generations on1descendant
  • K173510BioStamp nPointMc10, Inc. · 2018 · 4 generations on0descendants
  • K123902Physical Monitoring Registration Unit-S (Pmru-S)Oktx, LLC · 2013 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K914920Biofeedback System/3Davicon, Inc.1992—
+1K022719Physical Monitoring Registration UnitMaryrose Cusimano, Ph.D./Phil Reaston2002—
+2K031995Comprehensive Neuromuscular ProfilerMedical Technologies Unlimited, Inc.2004—
+3K113074Cmap ProMedical Technologies, Inc.2012—
+4K173510BioStamp nPointMc10, Inc.2018—
+2K123902Physical Monitoring Registration Unit-S (Pmru-S)Oktx, LLC2013—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200210
200310
200410
201210
201310
201810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K914920, 1992–2018Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HCC? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HCC device

  1. #1 K233580 A Breathing System (ABS)score 8.1 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA lists a 510(k) statement for it but has not posted the file, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it? (6)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K022719Physical Monitoring Registration UnitMaryrose Cusimano, Ph.D./Phil Reaston20024
K033452CWAS 1000Fasstech20030

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K022719 (Maryrose Cusimano, Ph.D./Phil Reaston, 2002) has gone furthest, with 4 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All HCC devices

HCC Device, Biofeedback: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · HCC

1in 2024

2007: 12008: 22010: 12011: 12013: 22015: 22017: 12018: 12023: 12024: 1
2007high 2 (2008) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HCC

Too few HCC 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · HCC

1in 2015

2012: 12015: 1
2007high 1 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HCC

5in 2024

2007: 22008: 22009: 12011: 42012: 22013: 22014: 22016: 42017: 32018: 12019: 62020: 22022: 32023: 22024: 5
2007high 6 (2019) · low 0 (2010)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HCC, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—02
20082—02
20090—01
20101—00
20111—04
20120—12
20132—02
20140—02
20152—10
20160—04
20171—03
20181—01
20190—06
20200—02
20210—00
20220—03
20231—02
20241—05
20250—00
20260—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K914920: Biofeedback System/3.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K914920

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026