510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2025

Stryker Laparoscopic Suction Irrigator

K934094510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 18, 1994179-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.1500Recalls 3

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Stryker Corp. · GCJ Laparoscope, General & Plastic Surgery

Cleared on Feb 18, 1994 after a 179-day review. FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known. 37 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 3 times.

Decided
Feb 18, 1994
Review
179 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GCJ
Recalls
3
Predicates
0

37 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 1997: 1 descendant cleared1999: 1 descendant cleared2011: 2 descendants cleared2005: 1 descendant cleared2010: 2 descendants cleared2006: 1 descendant cleared2019: 2 descendants cleared2017: 4 descendants cleared2008: 1 descendant cleared2015: 2 descendants cleared2018: 3 descendants cleared2022: 4 descendants cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2016: 2 descendants cleared2026: 3 descendants cleared2025: 1 descendant cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared2024: 2 descendants cleared2020: 2 descendants cleared1990200020102020
  1. This deviceK934094 Stryker Laparoscopic Suction IrrigatorStryker Corp. · 1994
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 30 of its ownK992126 Circon Surgiflex Wave Tsunami Suction-Irrigation SystemCircon Corp. · 1999
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 23 of its ownK062779 Defogging Heated Endoscope Lens Protector (Dhelp); Defogging…New Wave Surgical Corporation · 2006 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 16 of its ownK080613 Clear-VU System, Models: CVL-01-1000, CVL-01-1030, CVL-01-1045Minimally Invasive Devices, LLC · 2008
  5. Descendant · 4 generations on · 8 of its ownK151117 Laparoscope Lens Shield DeviceMedeon Biodesign, Inc. · 2015
  6. Descendant · 5 generations on · 7 of its ownK160172 Laparoscope Lens Shield DeviceMedeon Biodesign, Inc. · 2016

Showing 5 of 37 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

1997: 11999: 12005: 12006: 12008: 12010: 22011: 22013: 12014: 12015: 22016: 22017: 42018: 32019: 22020: 22022: 42023: 12024: 22025: 12026: 3
1997high 4 (2017) · low 0 (1998)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 37 · See all
  • K992126Circon Surgiflex Wave Tsunami Suction-Irrigation SystemCircon Corp. · 1999 · cites it directly30descendants
  • K062779Defogging Heated Endoscope Lens Protector (Dhelp); Defogging Endoscope Lens Protector…New Wave Surgical Corporation · 2006 · 2 generations on23descendants
  • K080613Clear-VU System, Models: CVL-01-1000, CVL-01-1030, CVL-01-1045Minimally Invasive Devices, LLC · 2008 · 3 generations on16descendants
  • K151117Laparoscope Lens Shield DeviceMedeon Biodesign, Inc. · 2015 · 4 generations on8descendants
  • K160172Laparoscope Lens Shield DeviceMedeon Biodesign, Inc. · 2016 · 5 generations on7descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K934094Stryker Laparoscopic Suction IrrigatorStryker Corp.1994—
+1K992126Circon Surgiflex Wave Tsunami Suction-Irrigation SystemCircon Corp.1999—
+2K062779Defogging Heated Endoscope Lens Protector (Dhelp); Defogging Endoscope Lens…New Wave Surgical Corporation20062
+3K080613Clear-VU System, Models: CVL-01-1000, CVL-01-1030, CVL-01-1045Minimally Invasive Devices, LLC2008—
+4K151117Laparoscope Lens Shield DeviceMedeon Biodesign, Inc.2015—
+5K160172Laparoscope Lens Shield DeviceMedeon Biodesign, Inc.2016—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199710
199910
200510
200610
200810
201020
201120
201310
201410
201520
201620
201740
201830
201920
202020
202240
202310
202420
202510
202630
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K934094, 1994–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GCJ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GCJ device

  1. #1 K214046 780 nm 1688 4K Camera System, 780 nm L11 LED…score 21.4 · 21 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it? (37)

See all 37

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K992126Circon Surgiflex Wave Tsunami Suction-Irrigation SystemCircon Corp.199930
K963765Stryker Strykeflow Electrocautery ProbesStryker Endoscopy19975

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jun 18, 2025Class IIZ-2170-2025Under Investigation by firmDue to complaints their is the potential that irrigation solution may leaked into the handpiece and battery pack causing it to malfunction.
Sep 12, 2019Class IIZ-1509-2020OtherPotential diff. in the length of the sheath tube and the sheath/probe. A diff. in length could lead to the base of the sheath/probe not being fully seated in the sheath tube which could result in the distal tip of the sheath melting. This…
Nov 17, 2017Class IIZ-0835-2018Under Investigation by firmRoutine bioburden testing of certain lots were found to have levels higher than internal acceptable rates.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K992126 (Circon Corp., 1999) has gone furthest, with 30 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All GCJ devices

GCJ Laparoscope, General & Plastic Surgery: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GCJ

21in 2025

2007: 182008: 192009: 212010: 242011: 152012: 172013: 152014: 192015: 262016: 272017: 202018: 212019: 152020: 282021: 182022: 202023: 312024: 292025: 212026 (partial year): 26
2007high 31 (2023) · low 15 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GCJ

108in 2025

2007: 42 days median2008: 73 days median2009: 85 days median2010: 122 days median2011: 113 days median2012: 88 days median2013: 93 days median2014: 90 days median2015: 76 days median2016: 99 days median2017: 77 days median2018: 88 days median2019: 60 days median2020: 61 days median2021: 116 days median2022: 103 days median2023: 109 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 108 days median2026 (partial year): 122 days median
2007high 122 (2010) · low 42 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GCJ

5in 2025

2007: 122008: 162009: 62010: 302011: 92012: 12013: 7, 1 Class I2014: 22016: 52017: 12018: 12022: 12023: 12025: 52026 (partial year): 1
2007high 30 (2010) · low 0 (2015)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GCJ

5,860in 2025

2007: 1,6392008: 1,3192009: 1,9952010: 2,6572011: 2,1332012: 1,5262013: 1,5652014: 1,7142015: 1,7102016: 2,0802017: 3,4682018: 2,5622019: 2,5782020: 2,6182021: 3,4312022: 3,9452023: 6,0022024: 6,0472025: 5,860
2007high 6,047 (2024) · low 1,319 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GCJ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071842121,639
20081973161,319
2009218561,995
201024122302,657
20111511392,133
2012178811,526
201315937 (1)1,565
2014199021,714
2015267601,710
2016279952,080
2017207713,468
2018218812,562
2019156002,578
2020286102,618
20211811603,431
20222010313,945
20233110916,002
2024299006,047
20252110855,860
2026261221—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K934094: Stryker Laparoscopic Suction Irrigator.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K934094

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026