510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Mayo Hip Prosthesis

K943230510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 14, 1997923-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3358

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Mayo Clinic · LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented

Cleared on Jan 14, 1997 after a 923-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 318 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jan 14, 1997
Review
923 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LPH
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

318 later devices descend from it, 4 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2011: 16 descendants cleared2005: 3 descendants cleared2003: 1 descendant cleared2012: 28 descendants cleared2008: 9 descendants cleared2006: 6 descendants cleared2004: 2 descendants cleared2010: 7 descendants cleared2014: 11 descendants cleared2007: 2 descendants cleared2015: 10 descendants cleared2019: 17 descendants cleared2009: 5 descendants cleared2021: 19 descendants cleared2013: 23 descendants cleared2018: 17 descendants cleared2017: 17 descendants cleared2022: 17 descendants cleared2016: 12 descendants cleared2024: 17 descendants cleared2026: 21 descendants cleared2025: 23 descendants cleared2020: 17 descendants cleared2023: 18 descendants cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK943230 Mayo Hip ProsthesisMayo Clinic · 1997
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 296 of its ownK030733 Mayo Conservative Hip Prosthesis, Model 8026 SeriesZimmer, Inc. · 2003 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 267 of its ownK040191 Bicontact Hip Stem and Femoral HeadAesculap · 2004
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 198 of its ownK042344 Excia Total Hip SystemAesculap, Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 166 of its ownK043079 Bicontact Hip System with U-CapAesculap · 2004
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 117 of its ownK093472 Trinity Acetabular SystemCorin USA · 2010 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 318 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2003: 12004: 22005: 32006: 62007: 22008: 92009: 52010: 72011: 162012: 282013: 232014: 112015: 102016: 122017: 172018: 172019: 172020: 172021: 192022: 172023: 182024: 172025: 232026: 21
2003high 28 (2012) · low 1 (2003)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 318 · See all
  • K030733Mayo Conservative Hip Prosthesis, Model 8026 SeriesZimmer, Inc. · 2003 · cites it directly296descendants
  • K040191Bicontact Hip Stem and Femoral HeadAesculap · 2004 · 2 generations on267descendants
  • K042344Excia Total Hip SystemAesculap, Inc. · 2005 · 3 generations on198descendants
  • K043079Bicontact Hip System with U-CapAesculap · 2004 · 3 generations on166descendants
  • K093472Trinity Acetabular SystemCorin USA · 2010 · 4 generations on117descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K943230Mayo Hip ProsthesisMayo Clinic1997—
+1K030733Mayo Conservative Hip Prosthesis, Model 8026 SeriesZimmer, Inc.20032
+2K040191Bicontact Hip Stem and Femoral HeadAesculap2004—
+3K042344Excia Total Hip SystemAesculap, Inc.200510
+3K043079Bicontact Hip System with U-CapAesculap2004—
+4K093472Trinity Acetabular SystemCorin USA20101

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200310
200420
200530
200660
200720
200890
200950
201070
2011160
2012280
2013230
2014110
2015100
2016120
2017170
2018170
2019170
2020170
2021190
2022170
2023180
2024170
2025230
2026210
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K943230, 1997–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LPH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LPH device

  1. #1 K233498 Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling Updatescore 24.2 · 20 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Zimmer® Anatomic Hip System
Named without a submission number
—
*—HG MultiLock™ Hip Prosthesis
Named without a submission number
—
*—BIAS™ Total Hip System
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (318)

See all 318

4 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K030733Mayo Conservative Hip Prosthesis, Model 8026 SeriesZimmer, Inc.2003296
K050441Taper 2 Porous Femoral StemBiomet, Inc.200585
K102172Msa Hip SystemGlobal Manufacturing Technology20113
K050251Balance Hip SystemBiomet, Inc.20052

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K030733 (Zimmer, Inc., 2003) has gone furthest, with 296 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All LPH devices

LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LPH

12in 2025

2007: 102008: 102009: 32010: 152011: 162012: 252013: 112014: 202015: 182016: 102017: 122018: 92019: 222020: 72021: 82022: 142023: 102024: 62025: 122026 (partial year): 8
2007high 25 (2012) · low 3 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LPH

153in 2025

2007: 116 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 112 days median2010: 100 days median2011: 110 days median2012: 76 days median2013: 135 days median2014: 129 days median2015: 111 days median2016: 150 days median2017: 121 days median2018: 145 days median2019: 164 days median2020: 164 days median2021: 410 days median2022: 247 days median2023: 111 days median2024: 92 days median2025: 153 days median2026 (partial year): 256 days median
2007high 410 (2021) · low 76 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LPH

4in 2025

2007: 162008: 12009: 22010: 222011: 262012: 302013: 92014: 32015: 12016: 82017: 142018: 22019: 82020: 62021: 42022: 22023: 22024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 30 (2012) · low 1 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LPH

6,163in 2025

2007: 5092008: 7062009: 1,1562010: 2,0072011: 3,3202012: 3,7852013: 5,0022014: 5,1632015: 5,8302016: 4,9002017: 5,3122018: 5,9542019: 7,1302020: 5,4292021: 5,9782022: 5,2232023: 5,3452024: 5,6262025: 6,163
2007high 7,130 (2019) · low 509 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LPH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071011616509
200810861706
2009311221,156
201015100222,007
201116110263,320
20122576303,785
20131113595,002
20142012935,163
20151811115,830
20161015084,900
201712121145,312
2018914525,954
20192216487,130
2020716465,429
2021841045,978
20221424725,223
20231011125,345
202469215,626
20251215346,163
202682562—

What is it indicated for?

The MAYO Hip is used in total hip arthroplasty, a surgical procedure restricted to patients with substantial pain or marked functional disabilities in which conservative treatment has not provided acceptable relief and who are not candidates for other less aggressive forms of surgery. This hip is indicated for noncemented use in skeletally mature individuals. Diagnostic indications include severe hip pain and disability due to rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, polyarthritis, collagen disorders, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, fused hip, fracture of the pelvis, and diastrophic variant.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K943230: Mayo Hip Prosthesis.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K943230

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026