510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

R 302

K946320510(k) TraditionalCleared May 11, 1995134-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1610

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Ralco S.R.L. · KPW Device, Beam Limiting, X-Ray, Diagnostic

Cleared on May 11, 1995 after a 134-day review. FDA lists a 510(k) statement for it but has not posted the file, so its predicates are not known. 9 later devices descend from it.

Decided
May 11, 1995
Review
134 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KPW
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

9 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2003: 1 descendant cleared2008: 1 descendant cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2009: 1 descendant cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2018: 1 descendant cleared2017: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK946320 R 302Ralco S.R.L. · 1995
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 5 of its ownK080742 Verisuite 1.6, Verisuite-Particle 1.6Medcom GmbH · 2008
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 3 of its ownK092653 Verisuite and Verisuite-Particle, Version 1.8Medcom GmbH · 2009
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 2 of its ownK133914 Verisuite 1.8, Verisuite-Particle 1.8, Verisuite, Verisuite-ParticleMedcom GmbH · 2014
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK030487 R 72Ralco S.R.L. · 2003
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 0 of its ownK181789 VeriSuiteMedcom GmbH · 2018

Showing 5 of 9 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2003: 12008: 12009: 12010: 12011: 12013: 12014: 12017: 12018: 1
2003high 1 (2003) · low 0 (2004)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 9 · See all
  • K080742Verisuite 1.6, Verisuite-Particle 1.6Medcom GmbH · 2008 · cites it directly5descendants
  • K092653Verisuite and Verisuite-Particle, Version 1.8Medcom GmbH · 2009 · 2 generations on3descendants
  • K133914Verisuite 1.8, Verisuite-Particle 1.8, Verisuite, Verisuite-ParticleMedcom GmbH · 2014 · 3 generations on2descendants
  • K030487R 72Ralco S.R.L. · 2003 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K181789VeriSuiteMedcom GmbH · 2018 · 3 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K946320R 302Ralco S.R.L.1995—
+1K080742Verisuite 1.6, Verisuite-Particle 1.6Medcom GmbH2008—
+2K092653Verisuite and Verisuite-Particle, Version 1.8Medcom GmbH2009—
+3K133914Verisuite 1.8, Verisuite-Particle 1.8, Verisuite, Verisuite-ParticleMedcom GmbH2014—
+1K030487R 72Ralco S.R.L.2003—
+3K181789VeriSuiteMedcom GmbH2018—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200310
200810
200910
201010
201110
201310
201410
201710
201810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K946320, 1995–2018Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KPW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA lists a 510(k) statement for it but has not posted the file, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it? (9)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K080742Verisuite 1.6, Verisuite-Particle 1.6Medcom GmbH20085
K030487R 72Ralco S.R.L.20032

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K080742 (Medcom GmbH, 2008) has gone furthest, with 5 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All KPW devices

KPW Device, Beam Limiting, X-Ray, Diagnostic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · KPW

1in 2010

2010: 1
2007high 1 (2010) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KPW

Too few KPW 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · KPW

No recall names KPW since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · KPW

1in 2014

2007: 12014: 1
2007high 1 (2007) · low 0 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KPW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—01
20080—00
20090—00
20101—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—01
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K946320: R 302.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K946320

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026