510(k) · Cleared
ClearedOes Urology
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Olympus America, Inc. · EZO Urethrotome
Cleared on Dec 11, 1996 as substantially equivalent to K790071 (Olympus Corp., 1979) and 2 other predicates after a 664-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1979.
- Decided
- Dec 11, 1996
- Review
- 664 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- EZO
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 3
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K790071 (1979). 3 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 1 generation backK790071 Endoscope and AccessoriesOlympus Corp. · 1979 · Recalled
- This deviceK950719 Oes UrologyOlympus America, Inc. · 1996
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | K790071 | Endoscope and Accessories | Olympus Corp. | 1979 | 6 |
| 0 (this device) | K950719 | Oes Urology | Olympus America, Inc. | 1996 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 2 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in EZO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
- Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
- Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
What was it cleared against? (4)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K790071 | Endoscope and AccessoriesSummary page 1…ome System DEC 1 | 1996 Common/Usual Name: Endoscopic Accessories for Urology Classification Name: Endoscope and Accessories Predicate Devices: Olympus Urology System (K790071) Olympus Infant Resectoscope and Accessories (K904940) Olympus Flexible & Rigid Urethrotome System (K904339) Karl Storz Endosco… | 1979 |
| * | K904940 | Olympus Infant Resectoscope and AccessoriesSummary page 1…ccessories for Urology Classification Name: Endoscope and Accessories Predicate Devices: Olympus Urology System (K790071) Olympus Infant Resectoscope and Accessories (K904940) Olympus Flexible & Rigid Urethrotome System (K904339) Karl Storz Endoscopes & Accessories for Urology (Unknown). Submitted By:… | 1992 |
| * | K904939 | Flexible and Rigid Ureterotome System Our OCR of the scanned summary read K904339, which is not a number in FDA’s lists. Corrected to the number one digit away whose FDA name carries the summary’s words for the device, “Olympus Flexible & Rigid Urethrotome System”. | 1992 |
| * | — | Karl Storz Endoscopes & Accessories for Urology Named without a submission number |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- 2 of the 3 ancestors have a recall of any class.
- 4 other devices also cite its predicate K790071.
How does its category compare?
All EZO devicesEZO Urethrotome: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · EZO
FDA has decided no EZO device since 2007.
Median 510(k) review, days · EZO
Too few EZO 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.
Recalls per year · EZO
1in 2010
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · EZO
1in 2024
MAUDE reports naming product code EZO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0 | — | 0 | 3 |
| 2008 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 0 | — | 0 | 3 |
| 2010 | 0 | — | 1 | 4 |
| 2011 | 0 | — | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 0 | — | 0 | 5 |
| 2013 | 0 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 0 | — | 0 | 3 |
| 2019 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 0 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 0 | 7 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
Olympus 00216 Otis Urethrotome and 02160 Replacement Blade are intended to be used for endoscopic and treatment within the urethra in adults.
Olympus 02161 Otis Urethrotome and 02162 Replacement Blade are intended to be used for endoscopic treatment within the urethra in children.
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K950719 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K950719: Oes Urology.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K950719
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026