510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Expandacell Injecto-Pak

K962133510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 1, 199659-day reviewClass I21 CFR 874.4100

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Shippert Medical Technologies Corp. · EMX Balloon, Epistaxis

Cleared on Aug 1, 1996 as substantially equivalent to K935724 (Denver Splint Co., 1994) and 2 other predicates after a 59-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1994.

Decided
Aug 1, 1996
Review
59 days
Class
Class I
Product code
EMX
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K935724 (1994). 3 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1996: 1 other ancestor1995: 1 other ancestorK935724 · The Expandacell Sinus Pack · Denver Splint Co. · 199419901992199419961998
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 2 other ancestors K935724 · The Expandacell Sinus Pack · Denver Splint Co. · 19940
  1. Root · 1 generation backK935724 The Expandacell Sinus PackDenver Splint Co. · 1994
  2. This deviceK962133 Expandacell Injecto-PakShippert Medical Technologies Corp. · 1996
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K935724The Expandacell Sinus PackDenver Splint Co.1994—
0 (this device)K962133Expandacell Injecto-PakShippert Medical Technologies Corp.1996—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199510
199610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K962133, 1994–1996Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EMX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EMX device

  1. #1 K220326 PosiSep X BAM Hemostat Dressing/Intranasal…score 4.3 · 1 generation · no Class I recall
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K935724The Expandacell Sinus Pack
Summary page 1
…d. This proposed change to an already approved and marketed device does in no way alter the safety and effectiveness of this medical device. The Expandacell Sinus Pack K935724/S1, Expandacell Injecto-Pak, K954845, and the Expandacell Injecto-Pak K960228 have a proven track record that establishes this pr…
Denver Splint Co.1994—
*K954845Expandacell Injecto-Pak Nasal Pack
Summary page 1
…y approved and marketed device does in no way alter the safety and effectiveness of this medical device. The Expandacell Sinus Pack K935724/S1, Expandacell Injecto-Pak, K954845, and the Expandacell Injecto-Pak K960228 have a proven track record that establishes this product line as safe to the post-operat…
Shippert Medical Technologies Corp.1995—
*K960228Expandacell Injecto-Pak Nasal Pack
Summary page 1
…way alter the safety and effectiveness of this medical device. The Expandacell Sinus Pack K935724/S1, Expandacell Injecto-Pak, K954845, and the Expandacell Injecto-Pak K960228 have a proven track record that establishes this product line as safe to the post-operative nasal or post-operative sinus surgery…
Shippert Medical Technologies Corp.1996—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 3 ancestors has a recall.

How does its category compare?

All EMX devices

EMX Balloon, Epistaxis: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · EMX

1in 2022

2022: 1
2007high 1 (2022) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EMX

Too few EMX 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · EMX

No recall names EMX since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · EMX

16in 2025

2007: 32008: 32009: 32010: 32011: 102012: 12013: 32014: 12016: 12018: 32019: 122020: 52021: 22023: 32024: 122025: 16
2007high 16 (2025) · low 0 (2015)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EMX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—03
20080—03
20090—03
20100—03
20110—010
20120—01
20130—03
20140—01
20150—00
20160—01
20170—00
20180—03
20190—012
20200—05
20210—02
20221—00
20230—03
20240—012
20250—016
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

For administration of liquid medication and hydrating for the sinus.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K962133: Expandacell Injecto-Pak.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K962133

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026