510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Modification to Otoacoustic Emissions (OAE0 Test Instrument

K964132510(k) TraditionalCleared May 13, 1997210-day reviewClass II21 CFR 874.1050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Bio-Logic Systems Corp. · EWO Audiometer

Cleared on May 13, 1997 as substantially equivalent to K944735 (Bio-Logic Systems Corp., 1994) after a 210-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1994. 4 later devices descend from it.

Decided
May 13, 1997
Review
210 days
Class
Class II
Product code
EWO
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K944735 (1994). 4 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2012: 3 descendants cleared2011: 1 descendant clearedK944735 · Bio-Logic Emav Emission Averaging Otoacoustic Test · Bio-Logic Systems Corp. · 19941990200020102020
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 3 descendants2 generations forward: 1 descendant K944735 · Bio-Logic Emav Emission Averaging Otoacoustic Test · Bio-Logic Systems Corp. · 19940
  1. Root · 1 generation backK944735 Bio-Logic Emav Emission Averaging Otoacoustic TestBio-Logic Systems Corp. · 1994
  2. This deviceK964132 Modification to Otoacoustic Emissions (OAE0 Test InstrumentBio-Logic Systems Corp. · 1997
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK112247 A Baer with Abaer I/O FunctionNatus Medical Incorporated · 2012
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK111618 Audx Otoacoustic Emissions Measurement System with Audx I/O FunctionNatus Medical Incorporated · 2011
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK122496 Audx Pro Otoacoustic Emissions Measurement SystemBio-Logic Systems Corp. · 2012
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK121512 Scout Sport Otoacoustic Emissions Measurement SystemBio-Logic Systems Corp. · 2012

Most influential descendants

Showing 4 of 4 · See all
  • K112247A Baer with Abaer I/O FunctionNatus Medical Incorporated · 2012 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K111618Audx Otoacoustic Emissions Measurement System with Audx I/O FunctionNatus Medical Incorporated · 2011 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K122496Audx Pro Otoacoustic Emissions Measurement SystemBio-Logic Systems Corp. · 2012 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K121512Scout Sport Otoacoustic Emissions Measurement SystemBio-Logic Systems Corp. · 2012 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K944735Bio-Logic Emav Emission Averaging Otoacoustic TestBio-Logic Systems Corp.1994—
0 (this device)K964132Modification to Otoacoustic Emissions (OAE0 Test InstrumentBio-Logic Systems Corp.1997—
+1K112247A Baer with Abaer I/O FunctionNatus Medical Incorporated2012—
+1K111618Audx Otoacoustic Emissions Measurement System with Audx I/O FunctionNatus Medical Incorporated2011—
+2K122496Audx Pro Otoacoustic Emissions Measurement SystemBio-Logic Systems Corp.2012—
+1K121512Scout Sport Otoacoustic Emissions Measurement SystemBio-Logic Systems Corp.2012—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201110
201230
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K964132, 1994–2012Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EWO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EWO device

  1. #1 K234095 OtoNova/OtoNova Proscore 9.4 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K944735Bio-Logic Emav Emission Averaging Otoacoustic Test
Summary page 1
…dition to the Scout Otoacoustic Emissions (OAE) Test Instrument. Otoacoustic Emissions Test Instrument Audiometer (per CFR 874.1050) . Bio-logic Scout OAE Instrument (K944735) Page 7 REVISED STATEMENT OF INTENDED USE FOR 510(k) #K964132 INTENDED USE: The intended use of the current Sco…
Bio-Logic Systems Corp.1994—

Also cleared against K944735: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (4)

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K112247A Baer with Abaer I/O FunctionNatus Medical Incorporated20121
K111618Audx Otoacoustic Emissions Measurement System with Audx I/O FunctionNatus Medical Incorporated20111
K121512Scout Sport Otoacoustic Emissions Measurement SystemBio-Logic Systems Corp.20120

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K112247 (Natus Medical Incorporated, 2012) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K944735.

How does its category compare?

All EWO devices

EWO Audiometer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · EWO

2in 2024

2007: 52008: 12009: 22010: 22011: 32012: 42013: 22014: 12015: 42017: 22018: 22019: 12022: 12023: 12024: 2
2007high 5 (2007) · low 0 (2016)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EWO

173in 2015

2007: 69 days median2011: 151 days median2012: 137 days median2015: 173 days median
2007high 173 (2015) · low 69 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EWO

4in 2023

2008: 12023: 4
2007high 4 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EWO

13in 2025

2007: 12008: 12009: 12010: 42011: 22015: 12019: 62020: 72021: 32022: 62023: 32024: 22025: 13
2007high 13 (2025) · low 0 (2012)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EWO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200756901
20081—11
20092—01
20102—04
2011315102
2012413700
20132—00
20141—00
2015417301
20160—00
20172—00
20182—00
20191—06
20200—07
20210—03
20221—06
20231—43
20242—02
20250—013
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The intended use of the current Scout Otoacoustic Emissions Test Instrument is to measure or determine cochlear function either by measuring and recording transient (click evoked) otoacoustic emissions or by measuring and recording distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing continuous pure tones. The intended use of this new software feature is essentially the same as that of the predicate device. It provides for an additional test methodology…

Read the full statement (286 words)

The intended use of the current Scout Otoacoustic Emissions Test Instrument is to measure or determine cochlear function either by measuring and recording transient (click evoked) otoacoustic emissions or by measuring and recording distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing continuous pure tones. The intended use of this new software feature is essentially the same as that of the predicate device. It provides for an additional test methodology which measures DPOAE threshold instead of the more-routine DPOAE amplitude test. The threshold test (also called the Input/Output (I/O) function) involves varying the stimulus intensity levels while keeping the frequencies constant. Both test methods can be effectively used to differentiate normal and hearing-impaired subjects, but the amplitude test is usually preferred because it usually requires a shorter testing time. However, in cases where the amplitude test results in a DP-gram with a low DP response (close to the noise floor) at specific frequencies, the I/O function test can be used to determine if there is an improved response at other stimulus frequencies. Therefore, the I/O function test offers the potential to improve the identification of patients with normal hearing.

DPOAE threshold is the lowest stimulus intensity level which produces a DPOAE response amplitude that is distinguishable from the level of system distortion and from the noise floor. DPOAE threshold is expressed in much of the published literature as the lowest intensity of the F2 stimulus that generates a clear DPOAE response. DPOAE threshold does not equate to and should not be confused with audiometric or auditory threshold. Whereas auditory threshold measures assess the integrity of the entire auditory system from outer ear to cortex, DPOAE threshold measures are limited to assessment of outer hair cell function in the cochlea only.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K964132: Modification to Otoacoustic Emissions (OAE0 Test Instrument.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K964132

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026