510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2016

Anspach Micromax System

K965080510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 10, 199722-day reviewClass II21 CFR 874.4250Recalls 11

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

The Anspach Effort, Inc. · ERL Drill, Surgical, Ent (Electric Or Pneumatic) Including Handpiece

Cleared on Jan 10, 1997 after a 22-day review. FDA lists a 510(k) statement for it but has not posted the file, so its predicates are not known. 6 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 11 times.

Decided
Jan 10, 1997
Review
22 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ERL
Recalls
11
Predicates
0

6 later devices descend from it, 4 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2003: 1 descendant cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2002: 1 descendant cleared2005: 1 descendant cleared2006: 1 descendant cleared2018: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK965080 Anspach Micromax SystemThe Anspach Effort, Inc. · 1997
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK131053 Anspach Xmax, EMAX2 and EMAX2 Plus System with Otologic Attachment…The Anspach Effort, Inc. · 2013 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK022907 Anspach Powered Kerrison System (PKS)The Anspach Effort, Inc. · 2002
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK180063 OCM-G1 AttachmentThe Anspach Effort, Inc. · 2018
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK062413 Aesculap Pneumatic KerrisonAesculap, Inc. · 2006
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK042974 Medicon Vipair High Speed SystemMedicon EG · 2005

Showing 5 of 6 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2002: 12003: 12005: 12006: 12013: 12018: 1
2002high 1 (2002) · low 0 (2004)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 6 · See all
  • K131053Anspach Xmax, EMAX2 and EMAX2 Plus System with Otologic Attachment SystemThe Anspach Effort, Inc. · 2013 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K022907Anspach Powered Kerrison System (PKS)The Anspach Effort, Inc. · 2002 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K180063OCM-G1 AttachmentThe Anspach Effort, Inc. · 2018 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K062413Aesculap Pneumatic KerrisonAesculap, Inc. · 2006 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K042974Medicon Vipair High Speed SystemMedicon EG · 2005 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K965080Anspach Micromax SystemThe Anspach Effort, Inc.1997—
+1K131053Anspach Xmax, EMAX2 and EMAX2 Plus System with Otologic Attachment SystemThe Anspach Effort, Inc.20133
+1K022907Anspach Powered Kerrison System (PKS)The Anspach Effort, Inc.2002—
+2K180063OCM-G1 AttachmentThe Anspach Effort, Inc.2018—
+2K062413Aesculap Pneumatic KerrisonAesculap, Inc.2006—
+1K042974Medicon Vipair High Speed SystemMedicon EG2005—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200210
200310
200510
200610
201310
201810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K965080, 1997–2018Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ERL? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ERL device

  1. #1 K243280 Piezomed Pro (Piezomed Pro module M-PM100…score 12.0 · 9 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA lists a 510(k) statement for it but has not posted the file, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it? (6)

4 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K131053Anspach Xmax, EMAX2 and EMAX2 Plus System with Otologic Attachment SystemThe Anspach Effort, Inc.20131
K022907Anspach Powered Kerrison System (PKS)The Anspach Effort, Inc.20021
K042974Medicon Vipair High Speed SystemMedicon EG20050
K023070Sodem High Speed System (Pneumatic)Sodemsystems20030

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Oct 6, 2016Class IIZ-1944-2017Under Investigation by firmSupplied Directions for Use (DFU) did not contain a recommended service interval.
Oct 6, 2016Class IIZ-1945-2017Under Investigation by firmSupplied Directions for Use (DFU) did not contain a recommended service interval.
Oct 6, 2016Class IIZ-1995-2017Under Investigation by firmSupplied Directions for Use (DFU) did not contain a recommended service interval.
May 6, 2013Class IIZ-0779-2014Unknown/Undetermined by firmProduct did not reach expected sterility assurance level
Apr 25, 2013Class IIZ-0655-2014Component design/selectionThe firm Anspach Effort of Palm Beach Gardens, FL initiated a voluntary removal of the Pneumatic Drill System, including the motor hand-piece, Auto Lube foot control, without a pressure relief valve (PRV) due to the hand piece's outer…
Apr 25, 2013Class IIZ-0656-2014Component design/selectionThe firm Anspach Effort of Palm Beach Gardens, FL initiated a voluntary removal of the Pneumatic Drill System, including the motor hand-piece, Auto Lube foot control, without a pressure relief valve (PRV) due to the hand piece's outer…
Nov 28, 2012Class IIZ-1898-2014Process designThe Anspach Effort, Inc. in Palm Beach Gardens, FL is recalling their Anspach Custom Devices. The units were not manufactured consistently with Quality System requirements.
Nov 28, 2012Class IIZ-1897-2014Process designThe Anspach Effort, Inc. in Palm Beach Gardens, FL is recalling their Anspach Custom Devices. The units were not manufactured consistently with Quality System requirements.
Nov 28, 2012Class IIZ-1894-2014Process designThe Anspach Effort, Inc. in Palm Beach Gardens, FL is recalling their Anspach Custom Devices. The units were not manufactured consistently with Quality System requirements.
May 18, 2007Not classifiedZ-1008-2007Nonconforming Material/ComponentThe white film portion of the sterile pouch may become brittle prior to the expiry date compromising the sterility of the product.
Dec 18, 2006Not classifiedZ-1039-2008Labeling False and MisleadingIncorrect Sterilization Process --The Operating Manual for the product contains an incorrect statement regarding the sterilization of the Autolube foot control. The manual states that the product can withstand ETO sterilization, but there…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K131053 (The Anspach Effort, Inc., 2013) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.

How does its category compare?

All ERL devices

ERL Drill, Surgical, Ent (Electric Or Pneumatic) Including Handpiece: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · ERL

1in 2025

2008: 62009: 12012: 22013: 22014: 12015: 32016: 42017: 22018: 12019: 12020: 12021: 12022: 32024: 12025: 1
2007high 6 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ERL

191in 2022

2008: 181 days median2015: 86 days median2016: 180 days median2022: 191 days median
2007high 191 (2022) · low 86 (2015)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ERL

1in 2021

2009: 12013: 32020: 52021: 1
2007high 5 (2020) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ERL

1,469in 2025

2007: 1122008: 602009: 2492010: 4442011: 1,0682012: 1,3792013: 3,2312014: 1,9752015: 2,6302016: 1,4552017: 9992018: 1,3802019: 2,5152020: 2,3692021: 2,2832022: 1,5742023: 1,7252024: 1,5882025: 1,469
2007high 3,231 (2013) · low 60 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ERL, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—0112
20086181060
20091—1249
20100—0444
20110—01,068
20122—01,379
20132—33,231
20141—01,975
201538602,630
2016418001,455
20172—0999
20181—01,380
20191—02,515
20201—52,369
20211—12,283
2022319101,574
20230—01,725
20241—01,588
20251—01,469
20260—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K965080: Anspach Micromax System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K965080

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026