510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Osteonics Restoration Acetabular Ring

K970957510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 3, 199778-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.3300

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Osteonics Corp. · JDJ Mesh, Surgical, Acetabular, Hip, Prosthesis

Cleared on Jun 3, 1997 after a 78-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 7 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jun 3, 1997
Review
78 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JDJ
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

7 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2004: 1 descendant cleared2022: 1 descendant cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2024: 2 descendants cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK970957 Osteonics Restoration Acetabular RingOsteonics Corp. · 1997
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 6 of its ownK040680 Contour HA Coated Reconstruction RingSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2004
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 3 of its ownK211176 Smith & Nephew Hip SystemsSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2022 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK092098 Patient Specific Acetabular Reconstruction ProsthesisSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2010
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 0 of its ownK240783 Anthology Hip Stems; CPCS Hip Stems; Femoral Heads; R3 Acetabular…Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 2024
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 0 of its ownK242375 OR3O Dual Mobility SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2024

Showing 5 of 7 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2004: 12010: 12013: 12022: 12023: 12024: 2
2004high 2 (2024) · low 0 (2005)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 7 · See all
  • K040680Contour HA Coated Reconstruction RingSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2004 · cites it directly6descendants
  • K211176Smith & Nephew Hip SystemsSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2022 · 2 generations on3descendants
  • K092098Patient Specific Acetabular Reconstruction ProsthesisSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2010 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K240783Anthology Hip Stems; CPCS Hip Stems; Femoral Heads; R3 Acetabular Liners; Spectron Hip…Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 2024 · 3 generations on0descendants
  • K242375OR3O Dual Mobility SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2024 · 3 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K970957Osteonics Restoration Acetabular RingOsteonics Corp.1997—
+1K040680Contour HA Coated Reconstruction RingSmith & Nephew, Inc.2004—
+2K211176Smith & Nephew Hip SystemsSmith & Nephew, Inc.20221
+2K092098Patient Specific Acetabular Reconstruction ProsthesisSmith & Nephew, Inc.2010—
+3K240783Anthology Hip Stems; CPCS Hip Stems; Femoral Heads; R3 Acetabular Liners…Smith & Nephew, Inc.2024—
+3K242375OR3O Dual Mobility SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc.2024—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200410
201010
201310
202210
202310
202420
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K970957, 1997–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in JDJ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Osteonics Restoration Acetabular Cup Series
Named without a submission number
—
*—Osteonics Omnifit Cup Inserts
Named without a submission number
—
*—Osteonics Concentric Polyethylene Acetabular Cup
Named without a submission number
—
*—Osteonics Flanged Polyethylene Acetabular Cup
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (7)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K040680Contour HA Coated Reconstruction RingSmith & Nephew, Inc.20046

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K040680 (Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2004) has gone furthest, with 6 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All JDJ devices

JDJ Mesh, Surgical, Acetabular, Hip, Prosthesis: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · JDJ

FDA has decided no JDJ device since 2007.

Median 510(k) review, days · JDJ

Too few JDJ 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · JDJ

No recall names JDJ since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · JDJ

2in 2025

2007: 12008: 12010: 52011: 62012: 102013: 182014: 152015: 122016: 52017: 22018: 152019: 342020: 142021: 142022: 82024: 12025: 2
2007high 34 (2019) · low 0 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JDJ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—01
20080—01
20090—00
20100—05
20110—06
20120—010
20130—018
20140—015
20150—012
20160—05
20170—02
20180—015
20190—034
20200—014
20210—014
20220—08
20230—00
20240—01
20250—02
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The indications for the use of the Osteonics® Restoration Acetabular Rings, in keeping with those of other legally marketed Osteonics acetabular components, are as follows: Painful, disabling joint disease of the hip resulting from: degenerative arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis or late stage avascular necrosis. Revision of previous unsuccessful femoral head replacement, cup arthroplasty or other procedure. Clinical management…

Read the full statement (100 words)

The indications for the use of the Osteonics® Restoration Acetabular Rings, in keeping with those of other legally marketed Osteonics acetabular components, are as follows:

Painful, disabling joint disease of the hip resulting from: degenerative arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis or late stage avascular necrosis.

Revision of previous unsuccessful femoral head replacement, cup arthroplasty or other procedure.

Clinical management problems where arthrodesis or alternative reconstructive techniques are less likely to achieve satisfactory results.

Where bone stock is of poor quality or is inadequate for other reconstructive techniques as indicated by deficiencies of the acetabulum.

Class II cavitary or protrusio defects.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K970957: Osteonics Restoration Acetabular Ring.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K970957

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026