510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Inter-OP HA Porous Acetabular System (HA/Csti)

K972393510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 19, 199785-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3358

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc. · LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented

Cleared on Sep 19, 1997 after an 85-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 312 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Sep 19, 1997
Review
85 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LPH
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

312 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2020: 17 descendants cleared2000: 1 descendant cleared1998: 1 descendant cleared2003: 2 descendants cleared2001: 1 descendant cleared2004: 3 descendants cleared2025: 23 descendants cleared2011: 16 descendants cleared2024: 16 descendants cleared2015: 9 descendants cleared2018: 17 descendants cleared2012: 26 descendants cleared2008: 9 descendants cleared2006: 6 descendants cleared2010: 7 descendants cleared2016: 11 descendants cleared2005: 1 descendant cleared2019: 15 descendants cleared2022: 18 descendants cleared2023: 20 descendants cleared2007: 1 descendant cleared2013: 23 descendants cleared2017: 17 descendants cleared2009: 5 descendants cleared2021: 19 descendants cleared2026: 20 descendants cleared2014: 8 descendants cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK972393 Inter-OP HA Porous Acetabular System (HA/Csti)Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc. · 1997
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 309 of its ownK980711 Harris/Galante Porous (HGP) Hip Prosthesis with Calcicoat Ceramic…Zimmer, Inc. · 1998 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 296 of its ownK030733 Mayo Conservative Hip Prosthesis, Model 8026 SeriesZimmer, Inc. · 2003 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 267 of its ownK040191 Bicontact Hip Stem and Femoral HeadAesculap · 2004
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 213 of its ownK001277 Triflange Acetabular Cup SystemDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2000
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 207 of its ownK031495 Pinnacle Duofix HA Acetabular Cup ProsthesisDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2003

Showing 5 of 312 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

1998: 12000: 12001: 12003: 22004: 32005: 12006: 62007: 12008: 92009: 52010: 72011: 162012: 262013: 232014: 82015: 92016: 112017: 172018: 172019: 152020: 172021: 192022: 182023: 202024: 162025: 232026: 20
1998high 26 (2012) · low 0 (1999)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 312 · See all
  • K980711Harris/Galante Porous (HGP) Hip Prosthesis with Calcicoat Ceramic CoatingZimmer, Inc. · 1998 · cites it directly309descendants
  • K030733Mayo Conservative Hip Prosthesis, Model 8026 SeriesZimmer, Inc. · 2003 · 2 generations on296descendants
  • K040191Bicontact Hip Stem and Femoral HeadAesculap · 2004 · 3 generations on267descendants
  • K001277Triflange Acetabular Cup SystemDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2000 · cites it directly213descendants
  • K031495Pinnacle Duofix HA Acetabular Cup ProsthesisDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2003 · 2 generations on207descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K972393Inter-OP HA Porous Acetabular System (HA/Csti)Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc.1997—
+1K980711Harris/Galante Porous (HGP) Hip Prosthesis with Calcicoat Ceramic CoatingZimmer, Inc.19981
+2K030733Mayo Conservative Hip Prosthesis, Model 8026 SeriesZimmer, Inc.20032
+3K040191Bicontact Hip Stem and Femoral HeadAesculap2004—
+1K001277Triflange Acetabular Cup SystemDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.2000—
+2K031495Pinnacle Duofix HA Acetabular Cup ProsthesisDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.2003—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199810
200010
200110
200320
200430
200510
200660
200710
200890
200950
201070
2011160
2012260
2013230
201480
201590
2016110
2017170
2018170
2019150
2020170
2021190
2022180
2023200
2024160
2025230
2026200
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K972393, 1997–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LPH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LPH device

  1. #1 K233498 Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling Updatescore 24.2 · 20 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Inter-Op Porous Acetabular System
Named without a submission number
—
*—APR HA Porous Hip System
Named without a submission number
—
*—Natural-Hip HA
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (312)

See all 312

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K980711Harris/Galante Porous (HGP) Hip Prosthesis with Calcicoat Ceramic CoatingZimmer, Inc.1998309
K001277Triflange Acetabular Cup SystemDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.2000213
K200823Zimmer, Inc. Hip Joint Prostheses MR Labeling IZimmer, Inc.20201

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K980711 (Zimmer, Inc., 1998) has gone furthest, with 309 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All LPH devices

LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LPH

12in 2025

2007: 102008: 102009: 32010: 152011: 162012: 252013: 112014: 202015: 182016: 102017: 122018: 92019: 222020: 72021: 82022: 142023: 102024: 62025: 122026 (partial year): 8
2007high 25 (2012) · low 3 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LPH

153in 2025

2007: 116 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 112 days median2010: 100 days median2011: 110 days median2012: 76 days median2013: 135 days median2014: 129 days median2015: 111 days median2016: 150 days median2017: 121 days median2018: 145 days median2019: 164 days median2020: 164 days median2021: 410 days median2022: 247 days median2023: 111 days median2024: 92 days median2025: 153 days median2026 (partial year): 256 days median
2007high 410 (2021) · low 76 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LPH

4in 2025

2007: 162008: 12009: 22010: 222011: 262012: 302013: 92014: 32015: 12016: 82017: 142018: 22019: 82020: 62021: 42022: 22023: 22024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 30 (2012) · low 1 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LPH

6,163in 2025

2007: 5092008: 7062009: 1,1562010: 2,0072011: 3,3202012: 3,7852013: 5,0022014: 5,1632015: 5,8302016: 4,9002017: 5,3122018: 5,9542019: 7,1302020: 5,4292021: 5,9782022: 5,2232023: 5,3452024: 5,6262025: 6,163
2007high 7,130 (2019) · low 509 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LPH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071011616509
200810861706
2009311221,156
201015100222,007
201116110263,320
20122576303,785
20131113595,002
20142012935,163
20151811115,830
20161015084,900
201712121145,312
2018914525,954
20192216487,130
2020716465,429
2021841045,978
20221424725,223
20231011125,345
202469215,626
20251215346,163
202682562—

What is it indicated for?

Components of the Inter-Op HA Porous Acetabular System are intended to replace the acetabulum during total hip arthroplasty. The four metallic shell styles are porous coated and used in conjunction with a snap-in polyethylene liner. The acetabular components of this system are intended to achieve biological fixation to bone without the use of bone cement. While three of the shell styles are hemispherical, the Protrusio HA Porous Shell is designed to…

Read the full statement (166 words)

Components of the Inter-Op HA Porous Acetabular System are intended to replace the acetabulum during total hip arthroplasty. The four metallic shell styles are porous coated and used in conjunction with a snap-in polyethylene liner. The acetabular components of this system are intended to achieve biological fixation to bone without the use of bone cement.

While three of the shell styles are hemispherical, the Protrusio HA Porous Shell is designed to compensate for protrusio defects where there has been thinning of the medial and superior walls of the acetabulum. The inner diameter is hemispherical while the outer shell has a 10mm build up, thus maintaining the anatomical hip center and avoiding the medialization of the femoral component.

Diagnostic indications for use of components of the Inter-Op HA Porous Acetabular System include:

revision of a previously implanted acetabular prosthesis;

patient conditions of noninflammatory degenerative joint disease; e.g., avascular necrosis, osteoarthritis, or arthritis secondary to a variety of diseases and anomalies;

and,

inflammatory joint disease; e.g., rheumatoid arthritis.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K972393: Inter-OP HA Porous Acetabular System (HA/Csti).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K972393

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026