510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Resor-Pin Resorbable Membrane Pin

K972817510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 24, 1998360-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3930

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Geistlich-Pharma · LYC Bone Grafting Material, Synthetic

Cleared on Jul 24, 1998 after a 360-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 9 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jul 24, 1998
Review
360 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LYC
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

9 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2004: 1 descendant cleared2013: 2 descendants cleared2008: 1 descendant cleared2009: 2 descendants cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2026: 1 descendant cleared2022: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK972817 Resor-Pin Resorbable Membrane PinGeistlich-Pharma · 1998
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 8 of its ownK033074 Inion GTR Biodegradable Membrane SystemInion, Ltd. · 2004 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 5 of its ownK080308 Bio-Scaffold Bioscaff Alvelac Resobable ScaffoldBioscaffold International Pte, Ltd. · 2008
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 2 of its ownK082419 Reoss Powder, Reoss Putty, Reoss Gel, Models R-1,RP-1, RG-1Intra-Lock International, Inc. · 2009
  5. Descendant · 4 generations on · 1 of its ownK101827 OsteoscafTexas Innovative Medical Devices (Dba) Skeletal · 2011
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 1 of its ownK090083 Cytoflex Resorb, Model C03-0010 Through C03-090Unicare Biomedical, Inc. · 2009

Showing 5 of 9 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2004: 12008: 12009: 22011: 12013: 22022: 12026: 1
2004high 2 (2009) · low 0 (2005)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 9 · See all
  • K033074Inion GTR Biodegradable Membrane SystemInion, Ltd. · 2004 · cites it directly8descendants
  • K080308Bio-Scaffold Bioscaff Alvelac Resobable ScaffoldBioscaffold International Pte, Ltd. · 2008 · 2 generations on5descendants
  • K082419Reoss Powder, Reoss Putty, Reoss Gel, Models R-1,RP-1, RG-1Intra-Lock International, Inc. · 2009 · 3 generations on2descendants
  • K101827OsteoscafTexas Innovative Medical Devices (Dba) Skeletal · 2011 · 4 generations on1descendant
  • K090083Cytoflex Resorb, Model C03-0010 Through C03-090Unicare Biomedical, Inc. · 2009 · 3 generations on1descendant
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K972817Resor-Pin Resorbable Membrane PinGeistlich-Pharma1998—
+1K033074Inion GTR Biodegradable Membrane SystemInion, Ltd.20041
+2K080308Bio-Scaffold Bioscaff Alvelac Resobable ScaffoldBioscaffold International Pte, Ltd.2008—
+3K082419Reoss Powder, Reoss Putty, Reoss Gel, Models R-1,RP-1, RG-1Intra-Lock International, Inc.2009—
+4K101827OsteoscafTexas Innovative Medical Devices (Dba) Skeletal2011—
+3K090083Cytoflex Resorb, Model C03-0010 Through C03-090Unicare Biomedical, Inc.2009—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200410
200810
200920
201110
201320
202210
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K972817, 1998–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LYC? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LYC device

  1. #1 K253317 Cytrans™ Elashieldscore 14.3 · 10 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it? (9)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K033074Inion GTR Biodegradable Membrane SystemInion, Ltd.20048

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K033074 (Inion, Ltd., 2004) has gone furthest, with 8 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All LYC devices

LYC Bone Grafting Material, Synthetic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LYC

3in 2025

2007: 132008: 82009: 142010: 132011: 92012: 52013: 22014: 12016: 22020: 32022: 22025: 32026 (partial year): 3
2007high 14 (2009) · low 0 (2015)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LYC

267in 2025

2007: 80 days median2008: 73 days median2009: 100 days median2010: 164 days median2011: 224 days median2012: 120 days median2020: 156 days median2025: 267 days median2026 (partial year): 266 days median
2007high 267 (2025) · low 73 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LYC

1in 2018

2009: 12010: 22012: 22016: 22018: 1
2007high 2 (2010) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LYC

2in 2025

2007: 232008: 252009: 252010: 282011: 212012: 102013: 122014: 92015: 142016: 1402017: 192018: 142019: 152020: 52021: 122022: 62023: 92024: 62025: 2
2007high 140 (2016) · low 2 (2025)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LYC, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071380023
2008873025
200914100125
201013164228
20119224021
20125120210
20132—012
20141—09
20150—014
20162—2140
20170—019
20180—114
20190—015
2020315605
20210—012
20222—06
20230—09
20240—06
2025326702
202632660—

What is it indicated for?

Pin fixation in dental and maxillofacial surgery indicated for guided tissue regeneration and guided bone regeneration.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA 510(k) statement, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K972817: Resor-Pin Resorbable Membrane Pin.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K972817

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026