510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Compression Cerclage Gundolf CCG-GF

K973098510(k) TraditionalCleared Oct 27, 199769-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3010

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Plus Orthopedics · JDQ Cerclage, Fixation

Cleared on Oct 27, 1997 as substantially equivalent to K932024 (Encore Orthopedics, Inc., 1995) after a 69-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1995. 34 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Oct 27, 1997
Review
69 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JDQ
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K932024 (1995). 34 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2013: 1 descendant cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2022: 4 descendants cleared2021: 2 descendants cleared2024: 7 descendants cleared2025: 7 descendants cleared2018: 3 descendants cleared2017: 2 descendants cleared2023: 3 descendants cleared2026: 3 descendants cleared2020: 1 descendant clearedK932024 · CCG Cerclage System · Encore Orthopedics, Inc. · 19951995200020052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 3 descendants3 generations forward: 14 descendants4 generations forward: 10 descendants5 generations forward: 3 descendants6 generations forward: 1 descendant7 generations forward: 2 descendants K932024 · CCG Cerclage System · Encore Orthopedics, Inc. · 19950+5
  1. Root · 1 generation backK932024 CCG Cerclage SystemEncore Orthopedics, Inc. · 1995
  2. This deviceK973098 Compression Cerclage Gundolf CCG-GFPlus Orthopedics · 1997
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 33 of its ownK123055 Smith & Nephew, Inc Screw and Plate System InstrumentationSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2013
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 32 of its ownK140814 Evos Mini-Fragment Plating SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2014 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 14 of its ownK163361 ANTHEM™ Fracture SystemGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2017
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 11 of its ownK173166 ANTHEM Fracture SystemGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2017
  7. Descendant · 3 generations on · 10 of its ownK180554 ANTHEM Fracture SystemGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2018

Showing 5 of 34 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2013: 12014: 12017: 22018: 32020: 12021: 22022: 42023: 32024: 72025: 72026: 3
2013high 7 (2024) · low 0 (2015)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 34 · See all
  • K123055Smith & Nephew, Inc Screw and Plate System InstrumentationSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2013 · cites it directly33descendants
  • K140814Evos Mini-Fragment Plating SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2014 · 2 generations on32descendants
  • K163361ANTHEM™ Fracture SystemGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2017 · 3 generations on14descendants
  • K173166ANTHEM Fracture SystemGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2017 · 4 generations on11descendants
  • K180554ANTHEM Fracture SystemGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2018 · 3 generations on10descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K932024CCG Cerclage SystemEncore Orthopedics, Inc.1995—
0 (this device)K973098Compression Cerclage Gundolf CCG-GFPlus Orthopedics1997—
+1K123055Smith & Nephew, Inc Screw and Plate System InstrumentationSmith & Nephew, Inc.2013—
+2K140814Evos Mini-Fragment Plating SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc.20142
+3K163361ANTHEM™ Fracture SystemGlobus Medical, Inc.2017—
+4K173166ANTHEM Fracture SystemGlobus Medical, Inc.2017—
+3K180554ANTHEM Fracture SystemGlobus Medical, Inc.2018—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201310
201410
201720
201830
202010
202120
202240
202330
202470
202570
202630
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K973098, 1995–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in JDQ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new JDQ device

  1. #1 K261271 Cable-Ready® Cable Grip Systemscore 14.7 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K932024CCG Cerclage System
Summary page 2
…identical in design, material, strength, indications and contra-indications to the CC G Cerclage System, which is being sold by Encore Orthopedics, Inc. in Austin, TX (K-932024). In fact, the sama company manufactures both cerciage systems: FLUS Endoprothetik AG, Rotkreuz, Switzerland. The madified versio…
Encore Orthopedics, Inc.1995—

Also cleared against K932024: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (34)

See all 34

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K123055Smith & Nephew, Inc Screw and Plate System InstrumentationSmith & Nephew, Inc.201333

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K123055 (Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2013) has gone furthest, with 33 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K932024.

How does its category compare?

All JDQ devices

JDQ Cerclage, Fixation: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · JDQ

2in 2025

2007: 12008: 22009: 22011: 62012: 32013: 12014: 22015: 52016: 42017: 12018: 62020: 42022: 22023: 32024: 32025: 22026 (partial year): 1
2007high 6 (2011) · low 0 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · JDQ

130in 2024

2011: 130 days median2012: 134 days median2015: 92 days median2016: 129 days median2018: 101 days median2020: 93 days median2023: 141 days median2024: 130 days median
2007high 141 (2023) · low 92 (2015)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · JDQ

5in 2019

2008: 22010: 22013: 12015: 12019: 5
2007high 5 (2019) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · JDQ

84in 2025

2007: 52008: 252009: 192010: 282011: 302012: 1302013: 3212014: 2232015: 2052016: 2242017: 1382018: 1822019: 1582020: 1252021: 1412022: 1342023: 982024: 1152025: 84
2007high 321 (2013) · low 5 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JDQ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—05
20082—225
20092—019
20100—228
20116130030
201231340130
20131—1321
20142—0223
20155921205
201641290224
20171—0138
201861010182
20190—5158
20204930125
20210—0141
20222—0134
20233141098
202431300115
20252—084
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Compression Cerclage Gundolf CCG is suitable for particular forms of osteosynthesis, particularly for cerclage of the greater trochanter and femur associated with revision hip arthroplasties. In contrast to cerclage wires, the CCG compression band allows a functional compression to be achieved. An assumption is made that an indication for implant revision aiready exists. Reattachment of the greater trochanter. Bone support in case of a damagad…

Read the full statement (158 words)

The Compression Cerclage Gundolf CCG is suitable for particular forms of osteosynthesis, particularly for cerclage of the greater trochanter and femur associated with revision hip arthroplasties. In contrast to cerclage wires, the CCG compression band allows a functional compression to be achieved. An assumption is made that an indication for implant revision aiready exists.

Reattachment of the greater trochanter.

Bone support in case of a damagad proximal femur (e.g. by bone cement, loosered stem, or polyathylene wear particles), with a possible cancellous bone graft in the proximal femur area.

Cerclage of bone fissures.

Fracture protection during rasping of a new prosthetic canal and prior to implantation of a new stem.

Closing of a cortical fenestration.

Fractures in the area of the femoral stem.

To improve bone-cement interface.

In general, CCG and CCG-GF have the same function. In the case of conics! shape of the bone, pnmanly superior to the lesser trochanter the CCG-GF is indicated rather thar theCCG.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K973098: Compression Cerclage Gundolf CCG-GF.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K973098

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026