510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Resound Stealth Cic

K974081510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 12, 199744-day reviewClass I21 CFR 874.3300

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Resound Corp. · ESD Hearing Aid, Air-Conduction, Prescription

Cleared on Dec 12, 1997 as substantially equivalent to K921725 (Philips Hearing Instruments Co., 1992) after a 44-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1992.

Decided
Dec 12, 1997
Review
44 days
Class
Class I
Product code
ESD
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K921725 (1992). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K921725 · Philip XP Series, in-the Canal Hearing Aid · Philips Hearing Instruments Co. · 199219901992199419961998
  1. Root · 1 generation backK921725 Philip XP Series, in-the Canal Hearing AidPhilips Hearing Instruments Co. · 1992
  2. This deviceK974081 Resound Stealth CicResound Corp. · 1997
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K921725Philip XP Series, in-the Canal Hearing AidPhilips Hearing Instruments Co.1992—
0 (this device)K974081Resound Stealth CicResound Corp.1997—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K974081, 1992–1997Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ESD? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ESD device

  1. #1 K232999 Lyric4 Hearing Aidscore 8.4 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K921725Philip XP Series, in-the Canal Hearing Aid
Summary page 1
…al equivalence for the ReSound® Stealth CIC, a completely-in-the-canal hearing device, to the currently marketed predicate hearing device, the Philips XP CIC, 510(k) No. K921725, August 11, 1992, is based on the following: The effectiveness of this air-conduction hearing instrument, intended to amplify an…
Philips Hearing Instruments Co.1992—

Also cleared against K921725: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K921725.

How does its category compare?

All ESD devices

ESD Hearing Aid, Air-Conduction, Prescription: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · ESD

1in 2024

2008: 12013: 12024: 1
2007high 1 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ESD

Too few ESD 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · ESD

2in 2019

2010: 12018: 12019: 2
2007high 2 (2019) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ESD

53in 2025

2007: 132008: 132009: 32010: 12011: 32012: 62013: 372014: 42015: 62016: 72017: 42018: 122019: 92020: 52021: 42022: 42023: 82024: 162025: 53
2007high 53 (2025) · low 1 (2010)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ESD, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—013
20081—013
20090—03
20100—11
20110—03
20120—06
20131—037
20140—04
20150—06
20160—07
20170—04
20180—112
20190—29
20200—05
20210—04
20220—04
20230—08
20241—016
20250—053
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The indication for use of the air conduction hearing aids in this submission is to amplify sound for individuals with impaired hearing. The devices are indicated for individuals with losses in the following category(ies).

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K974081: Resound Stealth Cic.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K974081

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026