510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Digital Lgob Procedure Using Resound, Digital 5000 Series Hearing Aids

K984547510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 19, 199987-day reviewClass II21 CFR 874.1050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Resound Corp. · EWO Audiometer

Cleared on Mar 19, 1999 as substantially equivalent to K912669 (Resound Corp., 1991) after an 87-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1991. 34 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Mar 19, 1999
Review
87 days
Class
Class II
Product code
EWO
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K912669 (1991). 34 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2009: 1 descendant cleared2011: 4 descendants cleared2017: 1 descendant cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2013: 4 descendants cleared2015: 3 descendants cleared2016: 5 descendants cleared2018: 2 descendants cleared2021: 5 descendants cleared2026: 4 descendants cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2025: 2 descendants clearedK912669 · Resound Portable Prescriptive Programming System · Resound Corp. · 19911990200020102020
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 7 descendants3 generations forward: 5 descendants4 generations forward: 8 descendants5 generations forward: 7 descendants6 generations forward: 5 descendants7 generations forward: 1 descendant K912669 · Resound Portable Prescriptive Programming System · Resound Corp. · 19910+5
  1. Root · 1 generation backK912669 Resound Portable Prescriptive Programming SystemResound Corp. · 1991
  2. This deviceK984547 Digital Lgob Procedure Using Resound, Digital 5000 Series Hearing AidsResound Corp. · 1999
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 33 of its ownK090720 Cochlear Baha BP100Cochlear Bone Anchored Systems AB · 2009
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 11 of its ownK132278 Cochlear Baha 4 Sound ProcessorCochlear Americas · 2013
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 11 of its ownK103594 Ponto Pro PowerOticon Medical AB · 2011
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 10 of its ownK142907 Baha 5 Sound ProcessorCochlear Americas · 2015 · Recalled
  7. Descendant · 3 generations on · 10 of its ownK132775 Ponto Plus and Ponto Plus PowerOticon Medical AB · 2013

Showing 5 of 34 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2009: 12010: 12011: 42012: 12013: 42015: 32016: 52017: 12018: 22019: 12021: 52025: 22026: 4
2009high 5 (2016) · low 0 (2014)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 34 · See all
  • K090720Cochlear Baha BP100Cochlear Bone Anchored Systems AB · 2009 · cites it directly33descendants
  • K132278Cochlear Baha 4 Sound ProcessorCochlear Americas · 2013 · 2 generations on11descendants
  • K103594Ponto Pro PowerOticon Medical AB · 2011 · 2 generations on11descendants
  • K142907Baha 5 Sound ProcessorCochlear Americas · 2015 · 3 generations on10descendants
  • K132775Ponto Plus and Ponto Plus PowerOticon Medical AB · 2013 · 3 generations on10descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K912669Resound Portable Prescriptive Programming SystemResound Corp.1991—
0 (this device)K984547Digital Lgob Procedure Using Resound, Digital 5000 Series Hearing AidsResound Corp.1999—
+1K090720Cochlear Baha BP100Cochlear Bone Anchored Systems AB2009—
+2K132278Cochlear Baha 4 Sound ProcessorCochlear Americas2013—
+2K103594Ponto Pro PowerOticon Medical AB2011—
+3K142907Baha 5 Sound ProcessorCochlear Americas20151
+3K132775Ponto Plus and Ponto Plus PowerOticon Medical AB2013—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200910
201010
201140
201210
201340
201530
201650
201710
201820
201910
202150
202520
202640
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K984547, 1991–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EWO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EWO device

  1. #1 K234095 OtoNova/OtoNova Proscore 9.4 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K912669Resound Portable Prescriptive Programming System
Summary page 2
…ther currently marketed audiometric diagnostic testing equipment, and is almost identical to that marketed as the ReSound® Portable Prescriptive Programming (P3) System (K912669). ReSound’s Digital 5000 series hearing devices are built using a custom software programmable digital signal processor. The DSP…
Resound Corp.1991—

Also cleared against K912669: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (34)

See all 34

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K090720Cochlear Baha BP100Cochlear Bone Anchored Systems AB200933

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K090720 (Cochlear Bone Anchored Systems AB, 2009) has gone furthest, with 33 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K912669.

How does its category compare?

All EWO devices

EWO Audiometer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · EWO

2in 2024

2007: 52008: 12009: 22010: 22011: 32012: 42013: 22014: 12015: 42017: 22018: 22019: 12022: 12023: 12024: 2
2007high 5 (2007) · low 0 (2016)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EWO

173in 2015

2007: 69 days median2011: 151 days median2012: 137 days median2015: 173 days median
2007high 173 (2015) · low 69 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EWO

4in 2023

2008: 12023: 4
2007high 4 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EWO

13in 2025

2007: 12008: 12009: 12010: 42011: 22015: 12019: 62020: 72021: 32022: 62023: 32024: 22025: 13
2007high 13 (2025) · low 0 (2012)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EWO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200756901
20081—11
20092—01
20102—04
2011315102
2012413700
20132—00
20141—00
2015417301
20160—00
20172—00
20182—00
20191—06
20200—07
20210—03
20221—06
20231—43
20242—02
20250—013
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The ReSound® Loudness Growth in Octave Bands (LGOB) Loudness Scaling System is a new indication for use for the ReSound Digital 5000 hearing device family. The control for the system is incorporated into ReSound ReSource 11 fitting application software. The testing procedure is intended to be performed only by qualified hearing healthcare professionals. The purpose of the ReSound LGOB test is to evaluate a patient’s suprathreshold hearing at specific…

Read the full statement (300 words)

The ReSound® Loudness Growth in Octave Bands (LGOB) Loudness Scaling System is a new indication for use for the ReSound Digital 5000 hearing device family. The control for the system is incorporated into ReSound ReSource 11 fitting application software. The testing procedure is intended to be performed only by qualified hearing healthcare professionals.

The purpose of the ReSound LGOB test is to evaluate a patient’s suprathreshold hearing at specific frequencies. This is the range of hearing above a person’s threshold level but below their uncomfortable loudness level. The results of this test are used by the ReSource software to calculate hearing instrument fittings that are better tailored to the patient’s residual dynamic range of hearing. The LGOB test procedure requires the patient to evaluate narrow bands of noise signals generated directly the Digital-to-Analog converter within the hearing device. The patient indicates if the noise signal is Too Loud, Very Loud, Loud, Comfortable, Soft, Very Soft or Inaudible by entering their response with the hand held Personal Selector, which is the identical recording device used with the original P® system from ReSound.

The new LGOB application uses the patient’s own digital hearing device or a stock “Digital Master” device to produce the sound stimulus directly from the Digital to Analog converter (DAC) within the hearing aid’s Digital Signal Processor. No insert earphones are required. Either BTE or Custom In-The-Ear devices can be used to perform the LGOB loudness scaling measurements. The test protocol is initiated and controlled by connecting a Digital hearing device to a personal computer and using proprietary fitting software (ReSource II). When the fitting computer is disconnected, the hearing instrument functions normally.

Results from the test are used to provide fitting recommendations and initial device amplification parameter settings for the Digital 5000 and other programmable ReSound hearing devices.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K984547: Digital Lgob Procedure Using Resound, Digital 5000 Series Hearing Aids.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K984547

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026