510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Vocom (Vocal Cord Medialization) Implant

K974311510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 4, 1998107-day reviewClass II21 CFR 874.3620

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Gyrus Ent LLC · KHJ Polymer, Ent Synthetic-Polyamide (Mesh Or Foil Material)

Cleared on Mar 4, 1998 after a 107-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 13 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Mar 4, 1998
Review
107 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KHJ
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

13 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 1999: 1 descendant cleared2002: 1 descendant cleared2003: 1 descendant cleared2009: 3 descendants cleared2007: 1 descendant cleared2006: 1 descendant cleared2008: 2 descendants cleared2018: 1 descendant cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2024: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK974311 Vocom (Vocal Cord Medialization) ImplantGyrus Ent LLC · 1998
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 11 of its ownK013243 Coaptite Laryngeal Augmentation System 1CC & O.5CC, Models…Bioform, Inc. · 2002 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 10 of its ownK033398 Laryngeal Augmentation ImplantBioform, Inc. · 2003
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 6 of its ownK060815 Juliesse Injectable Laryngeal Augmentation ImplantBioform Medical, Inc. · 2006 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 5 of its ownK070090 Radiesse Laryngeal ImplantBioform Medical, Inc. · 2007
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 4 of its ownK071663 VF Gel PlusCoapt Systems, Inc. · 2008

Showing 5 of 13 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

1999: 12002: 12003: 12006: 12007: 12008: 22009: 32013: 12018: 12024: 1
1999high 3 (2009) · low 0 (2000)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 13 · See all
  • K013243Coaptite Laryngeal Augmentation System 1CC & O.5CC, Models 0008021-1, 0008022-1Bioform, Inc. · 2002 · cites it directly11descendants
  • K033398Laryngeal Augmentation ImplantBioform, Inc. · 2003 · 2 generations on10descendants
  • K060815Juliesse Injectable Laryngeal Augmentation ImplantBioform Medical, Inc. · 2006 · 3 generations on6descendants
  • K070090Radiesse Laryngeal ImplantBioform Medical, Inc. · 2007 · 2 generations on5descendants
  • K071663VF Gel PlusCoapt Systems, Inc. · 2008 · 3 generations on4descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K974311Vocom (Vocal Cord Medialization) ImplantGyrus Ent LLC1998—
+1K013243Coaptite Laryngeal Augmentation System 1CC & O.5CC, Models 0008021-1, 0008022-1Bioform, Inc.20021
+2K033398Laryngeal Augmentation ImplantBioform, Inc.2003—
+3K060815Juliesse Injectable Laryngeal Augmentation ImplantBioform Medical, Inc.20061
+2K070090Radiesse Laryngeal ImplantBioform Medical, Inc.2007—
+3K071663VF Gel PlusCoapt Systems, Inc.2008—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199910
200210
200310
200610
200710
200820
200930
201310
201810
202410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K974311, 1998–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KHJ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new KHJ device

  1. #1 K260266 Tympendi™ (810)score 12.2 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Montgomery® Thyroplasty Implant System
Named without a submission number
—
*—Hydroxylapatite Bone Graft Material
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (13)

See all 13

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K013243Coaptite Laryngeal Augmentation System 1CC & O.5CC, Models 0008021-1, 0008022-1Bioform, Inc.200211
K991324Titanium Vocal Fold Medializing Implant, Models 5001 001 (Female), and 5001 003 (Male)Heinz Kurz19990

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K013243 (Bioform, Inc., 2002) has gone furthest, with 11 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All KHJ devices

KHJ Polymer, Ent Synthetic-Polyamide (Mesh Or Foil Material): FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · KHJ

1in 2024

2007: 12008: 32011: 12012: 22013: 22015: 12016: 12024: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 3 (2008) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KHJ

46in 2008

2008: 46 days median
2007high 46 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KHJ

1in 2024

2015: 12024: 1
2007high 1 (2015) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · KHJ

1in 2025

2011: 42012: 22014: 22015: 12018: 42019: 22020: 12021: 12022: 32023: 12025: 1
2007high 4 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KHJ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
200834600
20090—00
20100—00
20111—04
20122—02
20132—00
20140—02
20151—11
20161—00
20170—00
20180—04
20190—02
20200—01
20210—01
20220—03
20230—01
20241—10
20250—01
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Smith & Nephew, Inc., ENT Division, Vocal Cord Medialization System is indicated for medialization thyroplasty in patients with unilateral vocal cord paralysis to improve voice quality.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K974311: Vocom (Vocal Cord Medialization) Implant.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K974311

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026