510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

7200 Ultrasound Imaging System

K981293510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 30, 199882-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1560

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Biosound Esaote, Inc. · IYO System, Imaging, Pulsed Echo, Ultrasonic

Cleared on Jun 30, 1998 as substantially equivalent to K944287 (Biosound, Inc., 1995) after an 82-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1995. 2 of the 115 devices in its family, counting itself, have a Class I recall. 113 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jun 30, 1998
Review
82 days
Class
Class II
Product code
IYO
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K944287 (1995). 113 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly. 2 of the 115 devices in this family, counting this one, have a Class I recall.

Descendants, by year cleared 2002: 1 descendant cleared2009: 2 descendants cleared2003: 2 descendants cleared2004: 1 descendant cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2015: 5 descendants cleared2016: 5 descendants cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2014: 4 descendants cleared2018: 5 descendants cleared2020: 8 descendants cleared2017: 7 descendants cleared2022: 9 descendants cleared2023: 7 descendants cleared2021: 12 descendants cleared2025: 15 descendants cleared, 2 with a Class I recall22026: 16 descendants cleared2019: 3 descendants cleared2024: 9 descendants clearedReference device: K913209 · Accessory to Genesis Iii (GCFM) · Biosound, Inc. · 1992Reference device: K953579 · Tee Probe · Biosound, Inc. · 1996K944287 · 7050 Ultrasound Imaging System · Biosound, Inc. · 19951995200020052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 6 descendants3 generations forward: 4 descendants4 generations forward: 5 descendants5 generations forward: 11 descendants6 generations forward: 13 descendants7 generations forward: 16 descendants8 generations forward: 14 descendants, 2 with a Class I recall29 generations forward: 13 descendants10 generations forward: 9 descendants11 generations forward: 6 descendants12 generations forward: 7 descendants13 generations forward: 4 descendants14 generations forward: 3 descendants15 generations forward: 1 descendant K944287 · 7050 Ultrasound Imaging System · Biosound, Inc. · 19950+5+10+15
  1. Root · 1 generation backK944287 7050 Ultrasound Imaging SystemBiosound, Inc. · 1995
  2. This deviceK981293 7200 Ultrasound Imaging SystemBiosound Esaote, Inc. · 1998
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 112 of its ownK020112 50S Tringa Ultrasound Imaging SystemPie Medical · 2002
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 107 of its ownK090505 Speq Ultrasound SystemSignostics Pty, Ltd. · 2009
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 103 of its ownK102153 Mobius Ultrasound Imaging SystemMobisante, Inc. · 2011
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 87 of its ownK133833 Nuvis Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2014 · Recalled
  7. Descendant · 5 generations on · 79 of its ownK152899 Philips Lumify Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Healthcare, Inc. · 2015 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 113 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2002: 12003: 22004: 12009: 22011: 12013: 12014: 42015: 52016: 52017: 72018: 52019: 32020: 82021: 122022: 92023: 72024: 92025: 152026: 16
2002high 16 (2026) · low 0 (2005)2026

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 113 · See all
  • K02011250S Tringa Ultrasound Imaging SystemPie Medical · 2002 · cites it directly112descendants
  • K090505Speq Ultrasound SystemSignostics Pty, Ltd. · 2009 · 2 generations on107descendants
  • K102153Mobius Ultrasound Imaging SystemMobisante, Inc. · 2011 · 3 generations on103descendants
  • K133833Nuvis Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2014 · 4 generations on87descendants
  • K152899Philips Lumify Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Healthcare, Inc. · 2015 · 5 generations on79descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K9442877050 Ultrasound Imaging SystemBiosound, Inc.1995—
0 (this device)K9812937200 Ultrasound Imaging SystemBiosound Esaote, Inc.1998—
+1K02011250S Tringa Ultrasound Imaging SystemPie Medical2002—
+2K090505Speq Ultrasound SystemSignostics Pty, Ltd.2009—
+3K102153Mobius Ultrasound Imaging SystemMobisante, Inc.2011—
+4K133833Nuvis Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc.20143
+5K152899Philips Lumify Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Healthcare, Inc.20154

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200210
200320
200410
200920
201110
201310
201440
201550
201650
201770
201850
201930
202080
2021120
202290
202370
202490
2025152
2026160
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K981293, 1995–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

2 devices in this family have a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new IYO device

  1. #1 K243937 Accuro 3Sscore 20.5 · 18 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K9442877050 Ultrasound Imaging System
Summary page 1
…ed doppler imaging system 892.1550 Ultrasonic pulsed echo imaging system 892.1560 Classification Number: 90IYN 90IYO 807.92(aX3) Predicate Device(s) Esaote 7050 (AU3) K944287 Additional Substantial Equivalence Information is provided in the following substantial Equivalence Comparison Table. === Page…
Biosound, Inc.1995—
†K913209Accessory to Genesis Iii (GCFM)Biosound, Inc.1992—
†K953579Tee ProbeBiosound, Inc.1996—

Also cleared against K944287: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (113)

See all 113

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K02011250S Tringa Ultrasound Imaging SystemPie Medical2002112

Has anything in its family been recalled? (2 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K242670Lumify Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound · 2025 · 8 generations on · ◆ in the 2025 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall
  • K242519Lumify Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound · 2025 · 8 generations on · ◆ in the 2025 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K020112 (Pie Medical, 2002) has gone furthest, with 112 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K944287.

How does its category compare?

All IYO devices

IYO System, Imaging, Pulsed Echo, Ultrasonic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · IYO

7in 2025

2007: 202008: 142009: 132010: 152011: 112012: 152013: 172014: 142015: 192016: 102017: 192018: 142019: 132020: 112021: 152022: 52023: 112024: 102025: 72026 (partial year): 10
2007high 20 (2007) · low 5 (2022)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IYO

171in 2025

2007: 17 days median2008: 36 days median2009: 79 days median2010: 113 days median2011: 69 days median2012: 68 days median2013: 50 days median2014: 63 days median2015: 46 days median2016: 36 days median2017: 72 days median2018: 56 days median2019: 59 days median2020: 57 days median2021: 64 days median2022: 190 days median2023: 177 days median2024: 220 days median2025: 171 days median2026 (partial year): 139 days median
2007high 220 (2024) · low 17 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · IYO

1in 2022

2007: 42008: 52009: 92010: 82012: 22013: 32014: 22015: 12018: 12019: 12021: 112022: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 11 (2021) · low 0 (2011)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · IYO

485in 2025

2007: 392008: 202009: 272010: 202011: 582012: 782013: 4362014: 3042015: 2682016: 2542017: 2382018: 3682019: 5372020: 4982021: 6172022: 5112023: 5272024: 6402025: 485
2007high 640 (2024) · low 20 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IYO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072017439
20081436520
20091379927
201015113820
20111169058
20121568278
201317503436
201414632304
201519461268
201610360254
201719720238
201814561368
201913591537
202011570498
2021156411617
202251901511
2023111770527
2024102200640
202571710485
2026101391—

What is it indicated for?

Diagnostic ultrasound imaging or fluid flow analysis of the human body as follows:

Diagnostic ultrasound imaging or fluid flow analysis of the human body as follows:

Diagnostic ultrasound imaging or fluid flow analysis of the human body as follows:

Diagnostic ultrasound imaging or fluid flow analysis of the human body as follows:

Diagnostic ultrasound imaging or fluid flow analysis of the human body as follows:

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K981293: 7200 Ultrasound Imaging System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K981293

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026