510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Mayfield Acciss Optical System

K982244510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 23, 199890-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.4560

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Ohio Medical Instrument Co., Inc. · HAW Neurological Stereotaxic Instrument

Cleared on Sep 23, 1998 as substantially equivalent to K955397 (Nomos Corp., 1996) and 1 other predicate after a 90-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1985. 2 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Sep 23, 1998
Review
90 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HAW
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K851659 (1985). 5 ancestors in all. 2 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1988: 1 other ancestor1994: 1 other ancestor1992: 1 other ancestor1999: 2 descendants clearedK851659 · Skull Mounted Stereotactic Surgical Device · Medco Products, Co., Inc. · 1985K955397 · Mayfield-Acciss Workstation · Nomos Corp. · 19961990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 2 descendants K955397 · Mayfield-Acciss Workstation · Nomos Corp. · 1996K851659 · Skull Mounted Stereotactic Surgical Device · Medco Products, Co., Inc. · 19850
  1. Root · 2 generations backK851659 Skull Mounted Stereotactic Surgical DeviceMedco Products, Co., Inc. · 1985
  2. 1 generation backK955397 Mayfield-Acciss WorkstationNomos Corp. · 1996
  3. This deviceK982244 Mayfield Acciss Optical SystemOhio Medical Instrument Co., Inc. · 1998
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK992843 The Mayfield / Acciss System with Windows NT for Cranial Surgery…Ohio Medical Instrument Co., Inc. · 1999
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK991267 Spine Applications for the Mayfield/Acciss Operating Arm and Optical…Ohio Medical Instrument Co., Inc. · 1999

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K992843The Mayfield / Acciss System with Windows NT for Cranial Surgery, the Mayfield / Optical…Ohio Medical Instrument Co., Inc. · 1999 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K991267Spine Applications for the Mayfield/Acciss Operating Arm and Optical Acciss Systems…Ohio Medical Instrument Co., Inc. · 1999 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K851659Skull Mounted Stereotactic Surgical DeviceMedco Products, Co., Inc.1985—
−1K955397Mayfield-Acciss WorkstationNomos Corp.1996—
0 (this device)K982244Mayfield Acciss Optical SystemOhio Medical Instrument Co., Inc.1998—
+1K992843The Mayfield / Acciss System with Windows NT for Cranial Surgery, the Mayfield…Ohio Medical Instrument Co., Inc.1999—
+1K991267Spine Applications for the Mayfield/Acciss Operating Arm and Optical Acciss…Ohio Medical Instrument Co., Inc.1999—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198810
199210
199410

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199920
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K982244, 1985–1999Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HAW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HAW device

  1. #1 K253856 Geniant Cranial (Navigated Neurosurgical…score 15.0 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K955397Mayfield-Acciss Workstation
Summary page 1
…Affairs Director Ohio Medical Instrument Company, Inc. (OMI) 4900 Charlemar Drive Cincinnati, Ohio 45227 2. Name of predicate device(s): Mayfield® ACCISS™ Workstation (K955397) Pelorus Arc Carrier (K874833) 3. Classification: Neurosurgical stereotactic instruments and accessories are Class II (21CFR 88…
Nomos Corp.1996—
*K874833Arc Adapter Assembly
Summary page 1
…Instrument Company, Inc. (OMI) 4900 Charlemar Drive Cincinnati, Ohio 45227 2. Name of predicate device(s): Mayfield® ACCISS™ Workstation (K955397) Pelorus Arc Carrier (K874833) 3. Classification: Neurosurgical stereotactic instruments and accessories are Class II (21CFR 882.4800). 4, Performance Stand…
Medical Equipment Development Co., Inc.1988—

Also cleared against K955397: 4 other devices →

What descends from it? (2)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K992843The Mayfield / Acciss System with Windows NT for Cranial Surgery, the Mayfield / Optical…Ohio Medical Instrument Co., Inc.19990
K991267Spine Applications for the Mayfield/Acciss Operating Arm and Optical Acciss Systems…Ohio Medical Instrument Co., Inc.19990

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 13 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 10.8 years on median.
  • None of the 5 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K992843 (Ohio Medical Instrument Co., Inc., 1999) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 4 other devices also cite its predicate K955397.

How does its category compare?

All HAW devices

HAW Neurological Stereotaxic Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · HAW

9in 2025

2007: 152008: 122009: 82010: 62011: 42012: 82013: 32014: 52015: 102016: 92017: 72018: 62019: 102020: 52021: 92022: 72023: 142024: 72025: 92026 (partial year): 5
2007high 15 (2007) · low 3 (2013)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HAW

163in 2025

2007: 107 days median2008: 112 days median2009: 221 days median2010: 138 days median2011: 66 days median2012: 178 days median2013: 172 days median2014: 238 days median2015: 232 days median2016: 175 days median2017: 226 days median2018: 112 days median2019: 147 days median2020: 88 days median2021: 168 days median2022: 128 days median2023: 142 days median2024: 107 days median2025: 163 days median2026 (partial year): 162 days median
2007high 238 (2014) · low 66 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HAW

2in 2025

2007: 22008: 102009: 62010: 282011: 52012: 42013: 6, 1 Class I2014: 52015: 32016: 52017: 22018: 2, 2 Class I2019: 4, 1 Class I2020: 12021: 4, 2 Class I2022: 12023: 4, 1 Class I2024: 2, 2 Class I2025: 22026 (partial year): 6
2007high 28 (2010) · low 1 (2020)2026

Class I (9 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HAW

3,425in 2025

2007: 492008: 532009: 962010: 2992011: 1,7252012: 9862013: 1,2902014: 1,6062015: 1,7672016: 1,8282017: 3,5052018: 4,4392019: 6,0622020: 3,4802021: 2,8272022: 1,9292023: 2,5102024: 3,7552025: 3,425
2007high 6,062 (2019) · low 49 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HAW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200715107249
2008121121053
20098221696
2010613828299
201146651,725
201281784986
201331726 (1)1,290
2014523851,606
20151023231,767
2016917551,828
2017722623,505
201861122 (2)4,439
2019101474 (1)6,062
202058813,480
202191684 (2)2,827
2022712811,929
2023141424 (1)2,510
202471072 (2)3,755
2025916323,425
202651626—

What is it indicated for?

Intended Use: The Optical Tracking ACCISS™ System is intended to be used in an identical manner as the predicate device (Mayfield®/ ACCISS™ Stereotactic Workstation). It is used for guidance and localization in open craniotomies and for surgeries, which are traditionally performed with a stereotactic apparatus, such as biopsies, thalamotomies and electrode implants. The system may also be used to review medical images in a neurosurgical context.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K982244: Mayfield Acciss Optical System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K982244

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026