510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Silkam Nonabsorbable Silk Surgical Suture

K990089510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 15, 199963-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.5030

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Aesculap, Inc. · GAP Suture, Nonabsorbable, Silk

Cleared on Mar 15, 1999 after a 63-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 14 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Mar 15, 1999
Review
63 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GAP
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

14 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2005: 1 descendant cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2016: 1 descendant cleared2008: 1 descendant cleared2023: 3 descendants cleared2017: 2 descendants cleared2018: 2 descendants cleared2024: 2 descendants cleared2022: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK990089 Silkam Nonabsorbable Silk Surgical SutureAesculap, Inc. · 1999
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 13 of its ownK041514 Truesilk Non-Absorbable Silk Surgical SutureSutures India Private Limited · 2005
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 9 of its ownK080684 WG-Surgical Sutures with NeedleFoosin Medical Supplies, Inc. · 2008
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 4 of its ownK161633 Rexlon, RexsilSm Eng Co., Ltd. · 2017
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 2 of its ownK160623 FILASILK - Natural Non-absorbable Silk Surgical Suture, FILAMIDE -…M/s. Meril Endo Surgery Private Limited. · 2016
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 1 of its ownK173747 RexleneSm Eng Co., Ltd. · 2018

Showing 5 of 14 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2005: 12008: 12015: 12016: 12017: 22018: 22022: 12023: 32024: 2
2005high 3 (2023) · low 0 (2006)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 14 · See all
  • K041514Truesilk Non-Absorbable Silk Surgical SutureSutures India Private Limited · 2005 · cites it directly13descendants
  • K080684WG-Surgical Sutures with NeedleFoosin Medical Supplies, Inc. · 2008 · 2 generations on9descendants
  • K161633Rexlon, RexsilSm Eng Co., Ltd. · 2017 · 3 generations on4descendants
  • K160623FILASILK - Natural Non-absorbable Silk Surgical Suture, FILAMIDE - Non Absorbable…M/s. Meril Endo Surgery Private Limited. · 2016 · 2 generations on2descendants
  • K173747RexleneSm Eng Co., Ltd. · 2018 · 3 generations on1descendant
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K990089Silkam Nonabsorbable Silk Surgical SutureAesculap, Inc.1999—
+1K041514Truesilk Non-Absorbable Silk Surgical SutureSutures India Private Limited2005—
+2K080684WG-Surgical Sutures with NeedleFoosin Medical Supplies, Inc.2008—
+3K161633Rexlon, RexsilSm Eng Co., Ltd.2017—
+2K160623FILASILK - Natural Non-absorbable Silk Surgical Suture, FILAMIDE - Non…M/s. Meril Endo Surgery Private Limited.2016—
+3K173747RexleneSm Eng Co., Ltd.2018—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200510
200810
201510
201610
201720
201820
202210
202330
202420
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K990089, 1999–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GAP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GAP device

  1. #1 K222944 SafePath Sulturing System-Silk Suture…score 9.7 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Perma-Hand® Nonabsorbable Silk Surgical Suture
Named without a submission number
—
*—Nonabsorbable Silk Surgical Suture (Davis & Geck)
Named without a submission number
—
*—SOFSILK® Nonabsorbable Silk Surgical Suture
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (14)

See all 14

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K041514Truesilk Non-Absorbable Silk Surgical SutureSutures India Private Limited200513
K143582Mopylen, Resopren, Silk, Polyester, Nylon, Resolon, Polyamide Pseudo, SteelResorba Medical GmbH20150

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K041514 (Sutures India Private Limited, 2005) has gone furthest, with 13 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All GAP devices

GAP Suture, Nonabsorbable, Silk: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GAP

3in 2024

2007: 12008: 12016: 22017: 12018: 12023: 12024: 3
2007high 3 (2024) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GAP

193in 2024

2024: 193 days median
2007high 193 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GAP

1in 2023

2011: 212014: 12018: 12023: 1
2007high 21 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GAP

478in 2025

2007: 72008: 212009: 122010: 242011: 62012: 82013: 32014: 152015: 252016: 542017: 552018: 3402019: 3332020: 4262021: 4372022: 4192023: 4042024: 4552025: 478
2007high 478 (2025) · low 3 (2013)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GAP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—07
20081—021
20090—012
20100—024
20110—216
20120—08
20130—03
20140—115
20150—025
20162—054
20171—055
20181—1340
20190—0333
20200—0426
20210—0437
20220—0419
20231—1404
202431930455
20250—0478
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

Silkam® sutures are intended for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in cardiovascular, ophthalmic and neurological procedures.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K990089: Silkam Nonabsorbable Silk Surgical Suture.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K990089

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026