510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Hygeniclear WKR 1, Water-Delivery Device Ultraclear

K990479510(k) TraditionalCleared May 13, 199986-day reviewClass I21 CFR 872.6640

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Hygenitek, Inc. · EIA Unit, Operative Dental

Cleared on May 13, 1999 as substantially equivalent to K971278 (Pure Co., 1997) and 4 other predicates after an 86-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1988.

Decided
May 13, 1999
Review
86 days
Class
Class I
Product code
EIA
Recalls
None
Predicates
5

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K882491 (1988). 5 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1998: 1 other ancestor1997: 3 other ancestorsK882491 · Cutting Fluid System for Dental High Speed Drills · Steri-Sol, Inc. · 19881985199019952000
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 4 other ancestors K882491 · Cutting Fluid System for Dental High Speed Drills · Steri-Sol, Inc. · 19880
  1. Root · 1 generation backK882491 Cutting Fluid System for Dental High Speed DrillsSteri-Sol, Inc. · 1988
  2. This deviceK990479 Hygeniclear WKR 1, Water-Delivery Device UltraclearHygenitek, Inc. · 1999
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K882491Cutting Fluid System for Dental High Speed DrillsSteri-Sol, Inc.1988—
0 (this device)K990479Hygeniclear WKR 1, Water-Delivery Device UltraclearHygenitek, Inc.1999—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199730
199810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K990479, 1988–1999Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EIA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EIA device

  1. #1 K231845 Dental unit Model: Marescore 14.4 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (5)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K971278Pure Company Fluid Delivery System
Summary page 1
…ribed in CFR 872.6640. VII. Substantial Equivalence: Hygeniclear™ WKR 1 is substantially equivalent to other devices cleared for marketing by the 510(k) process under K-971278 (Pure Company), K-971727 (DCI Water Purifier), K-964271 (IGN Waterline Unit), and K-882491, K-973765 (Micryllum Labs). The "510(…
Pure Co.1997—
*K971727Dci Water Purifier
Summary page 1
…II. Substantial Equivalence: Hygeniclear™ WKR 1 is substantially equivalent to other devices cleared for marketing by the 510(k) process under K-971278 (Pure Company), K-971727 (DCI Water Purifier), K-964271 (IGN Waterline Unit), and K-882491, K-973765 (Micryllum Labs). The "510(k) "Substantial Equivalen…
Dental Components, Inc.1997—
*K964271Ign 500 TM Water Cleaning Unit with Calbenium Liquid
Summary page 1
…geniclear™ WKR 1 is substantially equivalent to other devices cleared for marketing by the 510(k) process under K-971278 (Pure Company), K-971727 (DCI Water Purifier), K-964271 (IGN Waterline Unit), and K-882491, K-973765 (Micryllum Labs). The "510(k) "Substantial Equivalence" Decision-Making Process (De…
Airel-West1997—
*K882491Cutting Fluid System for Dental High Speed Drills
Summary page 1
…quivalent to other devices cleared for marketing by the 510(k) process under K-971278 (Pure Company), K-971727 (DCI Water Purifier), K-964271 (IGN Waterline Unit), and K-882491, K-973765 (Micryllum Labs). The "510(k) "Substantial Equivalence" Decision-Making Process (Detailed) from ODE Guidance Memorandu…
Steri-Sol, Inc.1988—
*K973765BIO-2000
Summary page 1
…to other devices cleared for marketing by the 510(k) process under K-971278 (Pure Company), K-971727 (DCI Water Purifier), K-964271 (IGN Waterline Unit), and K-882491, K-973765 (Micryllum Labs). The "510(k) "Substantial Equivalence" Decision-Making Process (Detailed) from ODE Guidance Memorandum #86-3 wa…
Micrylium Laboratories1998—

Also cleared against K971278: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 5 ancestors has a recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K971278.

How does its category compare?

All EIA devices

EIA Unit, Operative Dental: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · EIA

7in 2025

2007: 32008: 62009: 32010: 32011: 52012: 22013: 22014: 22015: 72016: 42017: 12018: 22019: 22020: 12022: 32023: 32024: 32025: 72026 (partial year): 2
2007high 7 (2015) · low 0 (2021)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EIA

178in 2025

2007: 90 days median2008: 72 days median2009: 109 days median2010: 270 days median2011: 150 days median2015: 214 days median2016: 182 days median2022: 265 days median2023: 686 days median2024: 251 days median2025: 178 days median
2007high 686 (2023) · low 72 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EIA

1in 2013

2012: 12013: 1
2007high 1 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EIA

47in 2025

2010: 22011: 32012: 72013: 62014: 2552015: 4522016: 1512017: 642018: 732019: 682020: 482021: 492022: 442023: 532024: 532025: 47
2007high 452 (2015) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EIA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200739000
200867200
2009310900
2010327002
2011515003
20122—17
20132—16
20142—0255
201572140452
201641820151
20171—064
20182—073
20192—068
20201—048
20210—049
20223265044
20233686053
20243251053
20257178047
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

To isolate water delivery lines in the dental operatory unit and reduce the contamination due to biofilm to improve the quality of water supplied to dental handpieces and other dental instruments.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K990479: Hygeniclear WKR 1, Water-Delivery Device Ultraclear.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K990479

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026