510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Carbon Dioxide - L3K Assay, Catalogue Number 299-30/40/50

K990754510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 20, 199943-day reviewClass II21 CFR 862.1160

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Diagnostic Chemicals, Ltd. · KHS Enzymatic, Carbon-Dioxide

Cleared on Apr 20, 1999 after a 43-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Apr 20, 1999
Review
43 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KHS
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2006: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK990754 Carbon Dioxide - L3K Assay, Catalogue Number 299-30/40/50Diagnostic Chemicals, Ltd. · 1999
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK060619 Diazyme Carbon Dioxide Enzymatic Assay Kit, Model KZ122ADiazyme Laboratories · 2006

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K060619Diazyme Carbon Dioxide Enzymatic Assay Kit, Model KZ122ADiazyme Laboratories · 2006 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K990754Carbon Dioxide - L3K Assay, Catalogue Number 299-30/40/50Diagnostic Chemicals, Ltd.1999—
+1K060619Diazyme Carbon Dioxide Enzymatic Assay Kit, Model KZ122ADiazyme Laboratories2006—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K990754, 1999–2006Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KHS? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K060619Diazyme Carbon Dioxide Enzymatic Assay Kit, Model KZ122ADiazyme Laboratories20060

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K060619 (Diazyme Laboratories, 2006) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All KHS devices

KHS Enzymatic, Carbon-Dioxide: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · KHS

1in 2017

2007: 22008: 12009: 12010: 32011: 12012: 22013: 22014: 12016: 12017: 1
2007high 3 (2010) · low 0 (2015)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KHS

143in 2010

2010: 143 days median
2007high 143 (2010)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KHS

1in 2025

2013: 12019: 12023: 12025: 1
2007high 1 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · KHS

40in 2025

2008: 22009: 142011: 52012: 32013: 22014: 62015: 12016: 42017: 72018: 152019: 352020: 312021: 142022: 102023: 252024: 302025: 40
2007high 40 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KHS, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—00
20081—02
20091—014
2010314300
20111—05
20122—03
20132—12
20141—06
20150—01
20161—04
20171—07
20180—015
20190—135
20200—031
20210—014
20220—010
20230—125
20240—030
20250—140
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

For the quantitative determination of carbon dioxide in serum. For IN VITRO diagnostic use. Elevated blood CO₂ is almost synonymous with respiratory acidosis. The latter is restricted to clinical conditions with a primary increase in carbon dioxide in the inspired air or increased metabolic production of carbon dioxide. Decreased blood CO₂ is almost synonymous with respiratory alkalosis. The latter is restricted to clinical conditions with a primary…

Read the full statement (162 words)

For the quantitative determination of carbon dioxide in serum. For IN VITRO diagnostic use.

Elevated blood CO₂ is almost synonymous with respiratory acidosis. The latter is restricted to clinical conditions with a primary increase in carbon dioxide in the inspired air or increased metabolic production of carbon dioxide.

Decreased blood CO₂ is almost synonymous with respiratory alkalosis. The latter is restricted to clinical conditions with a primary decrease in carbon dioxide which can result from increased pulmonary ventilation due to mechanical ventilation or stimulation of the respiratory center (1).

Classic techniques for the measurement of carbon dioxide (CO₂) involve the addition of acid to liberate the carbon dioxide and the measurement of carbon dioxide thus released by either manometric, volumetric, or titrimetric techniques. These procedures are both time consuming and cumbersome. The DCL Carbon Dioxide-L3K assay is an enzymatic procedure, employing phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) (2) and a stabilized NAD analog (3), which is easy to use and applicable to routine laboratory instrumentation.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA 510(k) statement, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K990754: Carbon Dioxide - L3K Assay, Catalogue Number 299-30/40/50.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K990754

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026