510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

IN-Line Hemostasis Valve

K990975510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 15, 2000358-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.1340

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · DYB Introducer, Catheter

Cleared on Mar 15, 2000 after a 358-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 4 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Mar 15, 2000
Review
358 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DYB
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

4 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2015: 1 descendant cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2017: 1 descendant cleared2022: 1 descendant cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK990975 IN-Line Hemostasis ValveMerit Medical Systems, Inc. · 2000
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 3 of its ownK152528 Attachable Cath Lab Hemostasis ValveGalt Medical Corp. · 2015
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK182660 GaltTWSGalt Medical Corp. · 2019
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 0 of its ownK220280 Arrow Stiffening StyletArrow International, LLC (A subsidiary of Teleflex, Inc.) · 2022
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK173287 Elite HV RadialGalt Medical Corp. · 2017 · Recalled

Most influential descendants

Showing 4 of 4 · See all
  • K152528Attachable Cath Lab Hemostasis ValveGalt Medical Corp. · 2015 · cites it directly3descendants
  • K182660GaltTWSGalt Medical Corp. · 2019 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K220280Arrow Stiffening StyletArrow International, LLC (A subsidiary of Teleflex, Inc.) · 2022 · 3 generations on0descendants
  • K173287Elite HV RadialGalt Medical Corp. · 2017 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K990975IN-Line Hemostasis ValveMerit Medical Systems, Inc.2000—
+1K152528Attachable Cath Lab Hemostasis ValveGalt Medical Corp.2015—
+2K182660GaltTWSGalt Medical Corp.2019—
+3K220280Arrow Stiffening StyletArrow International, LLC (A subsidiary of Teleflex, Inc.)2022—
+2K173287Elite HV RadialGalt Medical Corp.20172

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201510
201710
201910
202210
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K990975, 2000–2022Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DYB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DYB device

  1. #1 K251051 AuST Steerable Sheathscore 18.0 · 10 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Merit Y-adaptor with hemostasis valve
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (4)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K152528Attachable Cath Lab Hemostasis ValveGalt Medical Corp.20153

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K152528 (Galt Medical Corp., 2015) has gone furthest, with 3 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All DYB devices

DYB Introducer, Catheter: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DYB

16in 2025

2007: 122008: 172009: 142010: 182011: 172012: 222013: 262014: 302015: 172016: 192017: 242018: 192019: 182020: 92021: 122022: 132023: 152024: 182025: 162026 (partial year): 17
2007high 30 (2014) · low 9 (2020)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DYB

63in 2025

2007: 95 days median2008: 37 days median2009: 52 days median2010: 123 days median2011: 100 days median2012: 128 days median2013: 118 days median2014: 122 days median2015: 129 days median2016: 95 days median2017: 70 days median2018: 156 days median2019: 47 days median2020: 49 days median2021: 78 days median2022: 143 days median2023: 55 days median2024: 56 days median2025: 63 days median2026 (partial year): 59 days median
2007high 156 (2018) · low 37 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DYB

3in 2025

2007: 152008: 92009: 252010: 182011: 42012: 32013: 5, 1 Class I2014: 22015: 2, 1 Class I2016: 45, 3 Class I2017: 22, 1 Class I2018: 12019: 22020: 21, 21 Class I2021: 62022: 22023: 102024: 22025: 32026 (partial year): 23, 21 Class I
2007high 45 (2016) · low 1 (2018)2026

Class I (48 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DYB

4,539in 2025

2007: 3162008: 4232009: 3992010: 4452011: 6282012: 8982013: 7432014: 7802015: 9132016: 1,2342017: 1,6722018: 1,9032019: 2,4502020: 2,4652021: 2,8352022: 4,0842023: 3,7752024: 3,9312025: 4,539
2007high 4,539 (2025) · low 316 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DYB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007129515316
200817379423
2009145225399
20101812318445
2011171004628
2012221283898
2013261185 (1)743
2014301222780
2015171292 (1)913
2016199545 (3)1,234
2017247022 (1)1,672
20181915611,903
2019184722,450
202094921 (21)2,465
2021127862,835
20221314324,084
20231555103,775
2024185623,931
2025166334,539
2026175923 (21)—

What is it indicated for?

The IN-LINE Hemostasis Valve is recommended for minimizing back bleeding when a catheter, guide wire or similar device is placed in the vascular system as well as maintaining a fluid-tight seal around interventional devices, catheters, and guide wires.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K990975: IN-Line Hemostasis Valve.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K990975

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026