510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Aktina Medicalphysics Corporation Mechanical Frontpointer

K990997510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 22, 199989-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.5050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Aktina Medical Physics Corp. · IYE Accelerator, Linear, Medical

Cleared on Jun 22, 1999 as substantially equivalent to K874558 (Philips Medical Systems, Inc., 1988) after an 89-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1988.

Decided
Jun 22, 1999
Review
89 days
Class
Class II
Product code
IYE
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K874558 (1988). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K874558 · SL Series, SL 15, 18, 20 & 25 · Philips Medical Systems, Inc. · 19881985199019952000
  1. Root · 1 generation backK874558 SL Series, SL 15, 18, 20 & 25Philips Medical Systems, Inc. · 1988
  2. This deviceK990997 Aktina Medicalphysics Corporation Mechanical FrontpointerAktina Medical Physics Corp. · 1999
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K874558SL Series, SL 15, 18, 20 & 25Philips Medical Systems, Inc.1988—
0 (this device)K990997Aktina Medicalphysics Corporation Mechanical FrontpointerAktina Medical Physics Corp.1999—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K990997, 1988–1999Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IYE? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new IYE device

  1. #1 K252977 Halcyon, Ethos Radiotherapy System (5.0)score 18.8 · 18 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K874558SL Series, SL 15, 18, 20 & 25
Summary page 1
…920 Phone: 914-268-0101 FAX: 914-268-1700 Registration Number: 2436865 Name of Predicate Devices Sears Tape Measure and Elekta Oncology Systems Mechanical Frontpointer K874558. 1 Any statement made in conjunction with this submission regarding substantial equivalence to any other product only relates ta…
Philips Medical Systems, Inc.1988—
*—Sears Tape Measure
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.

How does its category compare?

All IYE devices

IYE Accelerator, Linear, Medical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · IYE

12in 2025

2007: 232008: 142009: 202010: 232011: 112012: 282013: 182014: 202015: 202016: 212017: 232018: 212019: 192020: 202021: 192022: 122023: 182024: 92025: 122026 (partial year): 14
2007high 28 (2012) · low 9 (2024)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IYE

170in 2025

2007: 44 days median2008: 69 days median2009: 63 days median2010: 74 days median2011: 94 days median2012: 106 days median2013: 88 days median2014: 100 days median2015: 108 days median2016: 97 days median2017: 94 days median2018: 58 days median2019: 83 days median2020: 67 days median2021: 86 days median2022: 172 days median2023: 129 days median2024: 239 days median2025: 170 days median2026 (partial year): 120 days median
2007high 239 (2024) · low 44 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · IYE

1in 2025

2007: 782008: 492009: 222010: 272011: 732012: 202013: 112014: 142015: 82016: 72017: 72018: 72019: 22020: 42021: 52022: 32023: 72024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 4
2007high 78 (2007) · low 1 (2024)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · IYE

101in 2025

2007: 1552008: 1142009: 1742010: 2462011: 2802012: 1282013: 962014: 1242015: 1002016: 972017: 1252018: 852019: 912020: 742021: 682022: 662023: 1282024: 812025: 101
2007high 280 (2011) · low 66 (2022)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IYE, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007234478155
2008146949114
2009206322174
2010237427246
2011119473280
20122810620128
201318881196
20142010014124
2015201088100
20162197797
201723947125
20182158785
20191983291
20202067474
20211986568
202212172366
2023181297128
20249239181
2025121701101
2026141204—

What is it indicated for?

In Radiation Therapy and Diagnostic Radiology, an ongoing quality assurance program is essential for ensuring the overall quality of patient care. As part of the overall quality assurance program daily, monthly and annual tests to validate machine output, field size indicators, and general machine geometry are performed. In order to obtain reproducible results, these tests must be performed under the same conditions, with the same physical parameters.…

Read the full statement (168 words)

In Radiation Therapy and Diagnostic Radiology, an ongoing quality assurance program is essential for ensuring the overall quality of patient care. As part of the overall quality assurance program daily, monthly and annual tests to validate machine output, field size indicators, and general machine geometry are performed. In order to obtain reproducible results, these tests must be performed under the same conditions, with the same physical parameters. Since machine output and field size are directly rclated to the geometry of the test conditions it is important that the distance from the beam source to the test device is consistent. The Aklina Medical Physics Corporation Mechanical Frontpointer is designed to provide this ability. By utilizing the fixed geometry of the accessory mount system on a linear accelerator, a rigid based for measuring distance can be obtained. The Mechanical Frontpointer presented in this notification functions exactly as a standard mechanical tape measure however by being attached to a frame which slides into the accessory mount a reproducible setup is ensured.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K990997: Aktina Medicalphysics Corporation Mechanical Frontpointer.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K990997

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026