510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class I · 2016

Mini 6800 Digital Mobile C-Arm

K992506510(k) AbbreviatedCleared Aug 19, 199923-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1650Recalls 7 (1 Class I)

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Ge Dec Medical Systems · OXO Image-Intensified Fluoroscopic X-Ray System, Mobile

Cleared on Aug 19, 1999 after a 23-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 1 of the 3 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 2 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 7 times, including a Class I recall.

Decided
Aug 19, 1999
Review
23 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OXO
Recalls
7 (1 Class I)
Predicates
0

2 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly. 1 of the 3 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Descendants, by year cleared 2016: 1 descendant cleared2017: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK992506 Mini 6800 Digital Mobile C-ArmGe Dec Medical Systems · 1999
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK160131 OEC Elite MiniViewGe Hangwei Medical Systems Co., Ltd. · 2016
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK171800 OEC Elite MiniViewGe Hualun Medical Systems Co., Ltd. · 2017

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K160131OEC Elite MiniViewGe Hangwei Medical Systems Co., Ltd. · 2016 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K171800OEC Elite MiniViewGe Hualun Medical Systems Co., Ltd. · 2017 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K992506Mini 6800 Digital Mobile C-ArmGe Dec Medical Systems1999—
+1K160131OEC Elite MiniViewGe Hangwei Medical Systems Co., Ltd.2016—
+2K171800OEC Elite MiniViewGe Hualun Medical Systems Co., Ltd.2017—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201610
201710
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K992506, 1999–2017Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new OXO device

  1. #1 K253296 Digital C-ARM with 3Dscore 15.1 · 13 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—MINI 6600 Digital Mobile C-arm
Named without a submission number
—
*—FluoroScan Premier
Named without a submission number
—
*—ORCA Orthopedic C-arm
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (2)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K160131OEC Elite MiniViewGe Hangwei Medical Systems Co., Ltd.20161

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Dec 19, 2016Class IIZ-0974-2017Use errorGE Healthcare Surgery announces a voluntary field action for the OEC MiniView 6800, OEC 9900 Elite, and OEC 9800 because the workstation power cable assembly can result in intermittent power cord failures.
Oct 3, 2014Class IIZ-0193-2015Component design/selectionGE Healthcare initiated a field correction because prior revision of components were potentially installed on certain OEC 9800, FlexiView 8800, OEC MiniView 6800 and OEC UroView 2800 systems.
Jun 12, 2007Not classifiedZ-0851-2007OtherX-ray systems were not configured to display Air Kerma Rate and Cumulative Air Kerma.
May 24, 2007Not classifiedZ-0928-2007OtherX-ray systems did not have the required labeling to indicate Air Kerma Rate and cumulative Air Kerma during fluoroscopic procedures
Mar 27, 2007Class IIZ-2126-2012Software designPlease be aware that this is not a new recall. The firm has taken action; but, due to administrative issues this recall is now being classified by the Agency. GE OEC had discovered an issue with the hard disk drives that were installed on…
Nov 20, 2006Class IZ-2040-2012Device DesignPlease be aware that this is not a new recall. The firm has taken action; but, due to administrative issues this recall is now being classified by the Agency. The OEC 6800 Miniview was recalled in November 2006 due to several intermittent…
Mar 28, 2006Not classifiedZ-0704-06OtherRadiation exposure rate could exceed specifications during fluoroscopic x-ray procedure.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K160131 (Ge Hangwei Medical Systems Co., Ltd., 2016) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.

How does its category compare?

All OXO devices

OXO Image-Intensified Fluoroscopic X-Ray System, Mobile: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · OXO

4in 2025

2010: 12012: 42013: 22014: 22015: 12016: 32017: 42018: 12019: 32021: 22024: 22025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 4 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OXO

97in 2025

2012: 48 days median2016: 128 days median2017: 57 days median2019: 213 days median2025: 97 days median
2007high 213 (2019) · low 48 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OXO

4in 2024

2012: 42013: 32014: 42016: 32017: 42018: 112024: 42026 (partial year): 1
2007high 11 (2018) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · OXO

118in 2025

2012: 52013: 412014: 892015: 972016: 3,8202017: 1,6972018: 1,6472019: 1,2972020: 8162021: 5542022: 2952023: 2752024: 1922025: 118
2007high 3,820 (2016) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OXO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20101—00
20110—00
201244845
20132—341
20142—489
20151—097
2016312833,820
201745741,697
20181—111,647
2019321301,297
20200—0816
20212—0554
20220—0295
20230—0275
20242—4192
20254970118
20262—1—

What is it indicated for?

The MINI 6800 Digital Mobile C-arm is designed to provide the physician with general fluoroscopic visualization of the patient including but not limited to surgical orthopedic and extremity imaging. The device is not intended for whole-body pediatric imaging.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K992506: Mini 6800 Digital Mobile C-Arm.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K992506

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026