510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2023

Inter-OP Durasul Acetabular Inserts/Cocr Femoral Heads

K993259510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 10, 2000163-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3358Recalls 3

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc. · LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented

Cleared on Mar 10, 2000 as substantially equivalent to K983509 (Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc., 1999) after a 163-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1996. 326 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 3 times.

Decided
Mar 10, 2000
Review
163 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LPH
Recalls
3
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K955033 (1996). 326 later devices descend from it, 5 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2002: 2 descendants cleared2020: 18 descendants cleared2006: 6 descendants cleared2023: 20 descendants cleared2022: 23 descendants cleared2013: 22 descendants cleared2010: 8 descendants cleared2005: 1 descendant cleared2004: 2 descendants cleared2011: 21 descendants cleared2008: 7 descendants cleared2009: 6 descendants cleared2016: 15 descendants cleared2019: 18 descendants cleared2025: 24 descendants cleared2007: 1 descendant cleared2018: 18 descendants cleared2017: 17 descendants cleared2014: 10 descendants cleared2012: 22 descendants cleared2015: 10 descendants cleared2021: 20 descendants cleared2024: 16 descendants cleared2026: 19 descendants clearedK955033 · Rim Flare Acetabular Component · Intermedics Orthopedics · 1996K983509 · Inter-OP Acetabular System - Durasul Acetabular Insert · Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc. · 19991995200020052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 5 descendants2 generations forward: 12 descendants3 generations forward: 48 descendants4 generations forward: 60 descendants5 generations forward: 55 descendants6 generations forward: 47 descendants7 generations forward: 49 descendants8 generations forward: 35 descendants9 generations forward: 9 descendants10 generations forward: 6 descendants K983509 · Inter-OP Acetabular System - Durasul Acetabular Insert · Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc. · 1999K955033 · Rim Flare Acetabular Component · Intermedics Orthopedics · 19960+5+10
  1. Root · 2 generations backK955033 Rim Flare Acetabular ComponentIntermedics Orthopedics · 1996
  2. 1 generation backK983509 Inter-OP Acetabular System - Durasul Acetabular InsertSulzer Orthopedics, Inc. · 1999
  3. This deviceK993259 Inter-OP Durasul Acetabular Inserts/Cocr Femoral HeadsSulzer Orthopedics, Inc. · 2000
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 285 of its ownK022902 Smith & Nephew Hip SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2002
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 267 of its ownK040191 Bicontact Hip Stem and Femoral HeadAesculap · 2004
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 198 of its ownK042344 Excia Total Hip SystemAesculap, Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  7. Descendant · 3 generations on · 166 of its ownK043079 Bicontact Hip System with U-CapAesculap · 2004
  8. Descendant · cites it directly · 162 of its ownK022958 Total Hip Femoral Heads and LinersSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2002 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 326 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2002: 22004: 22005: 12006: 62007: 12008: 72009: 62010: 82011: 212012: 222013: 222014: 102015: 102016: 152017: 172018: 182019: 182020: 182021: 202022: 232023: 202024: 162025: 242026: 19
2002high 24 (2025) · low 0 (2003)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 326 · See all
  • K022902Smith & Nephew Hip SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2002 · cites it directly285descendants
  • K040191Bicontact Hip Stem and Femoral HeadAesculap · 2004 · 2 generations on267descendants
  • K042344Excia Total Hip SystemAesculap, Inc. · 2005 · 2 generations on198descendants
  • K043079Bicontact Hip System with U-CapAesculap · 2004 · 3 generations on166descendants
  • K022958Total Hip Femoral Heads and LinersSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2002 · cites it directly162descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K955033Rim Flare Acetabular ComponentIntermedics Orthopedics1996—
−1K983509Inter-OP Acetabular System - Durasul Acetabular InsertSulzer Orthopedics, Inc.1999—
0 (this device)K993259Inter-OP Durasul Acetabular Inserts/Cocr Femoral HeadsSulzer Orthopedics, Inc.2000—
+1K022902Smith & Nephew Hip SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc.2002—
+2K040191Bicontact Hip Stem and Femoral HeadAesculap2004—
+2K042344Excia Total Hip SystemAesculap, Inc.200510
+3K043079Bicontact Hip System with U-CapAesculap2004—
+1K022958Total Hip Femoral Heads and LinersSmith & Nephew, Inc.20021

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200220
200420
200510
200660
200710
200870
200960
201080
2011210
2012220
2013220
2014100
2015100
2016150
2017170
2018180
2019180
2020180
2021200
2022230
2023200
2024160
2025240
2026190
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K993259, 1996–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LPH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LPH device

  1. #1 K233498 Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling Updatescore 24.2 · 20 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K983509Inter-OP Acetabular System - Durasul Acetabular Insert
Summary page 1
…p™ Durasul™ Acetabular Inserts and CoCr Femoral Heads PRODUCT DESCRIPTION The Sulzer Orthopedics Inter-Op Durasul Acetabular Inserts were originally cleared via 510(k) K983509. The purpose of the present submission is to gain notice of substantial equivalence for line additions to these previously cleare…
Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc.1999—

Also cleared against K983509: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (326)

See all 326

5 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K022902Smith & Nephew Hip SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc.2002285
K022958Total Hip Femoral Heads and LinersSmith & Nephew, Inc.2002162
K061434Trident Large Diameter Hip SystemHowmedica Osteonics Corp.200654
K200823Zimmer, Inc. Hip Joint Prostheses MR Labeling IZimmer, Inc.20201
K211047CoCr HeadZimmer GmbH20230

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Feb 27, 2023Class IIZ-1294-2023Under Investigation by firmUpdate the compatibility matrix as referred to in the Instructions for Use (IFU) for the CoCr Femoral Head XS- removes the compatibility with the Epsilon Durasul Constrained Acetabular Liners from the matrix due to the range of motion in…
Dec 17, 2014Class IIZ-1132-2015Package design/selectionPotential compromise of the inner sterile tray. If a compromised tray is detected, a delay in surgery may result. If undetected breach in both the inner and outer trays were to occur, and there is contamination present, a periprosthetic…
Sep 4, 2012Class IIZ-0222-2013Error in labelingZimmer Inc., is initiating a correction to the patient labels of products manufactured before March 20I0 by the Zimmer GmbH production site in Winterthur, Switzerland, after receiving four complaints of a discrepancy between product…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 4 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.0 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K022902 (Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2002) has gone furthest, with 285 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K983509.

How does its category compare?

All LPH devices

LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LPH

12in 2025

2007: 102008: 102009: 32010: 152011: 162012: 252013: 112014: 202015: 182016: 102017: 122018: 92019: 222020: 72021: 82022: 142023: 102024: 62025: 122026 (partial year): 8
2007high 25 (2012) · low 3 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LPH

153in 2025

2007: 116 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 112 days median2010: 100 days median2011: 110 days median2012: 76 days median2013: 135 days median2014: 129 days median2015: 111 days median2016: 150 days median2017: 121 days median2018: 145 days median2019: 164 days median2020: 164 days median2021: 410 days median2022: 247 days median2023: 111 days median2024: 92 days median2025: 153 days median2026 (partial year): 256 days median
2007high 410 (2021) · low 76 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LPH

4in 2025

2007: 162008: 12009: 22010: 222011: 262012: 302013: 92014: 32015: 12016: 82017: 142018: 22019: 82020: 62021: 42022: 22023: 22024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 30 (2012) · low 1 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LPH

6,163in 2025

2007: 5092008: 7062009: 1,1562010: 2,0072011: 3,3202012: 3,7852013: 5,0022014: 5,1632015: 5,8302016: 4,9002017: 5,3122018: 5,9542019: 7,1302020: 5,4292021: 5,9782022: 5,2232023: 5,3452024: 5,6262025: 6,163
2007high 7,130 (2019) · low 509 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LPH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071011616509
200810861706
2009311221,156
201015100222,007
201116110263,320
20122576303,785
20131113595,002
20142012935,163
20151811115,830
20161015084,900
201712121145,312
2018914525,954
20192216487,130
2020716465,429
2021841045,978
20221424725,223
20231011125,345
202469215,626
20251215346,163
202682562—

What is it indicated for?

The Inter-Op Durasul Acetabular Components and CoCr Femoral Heads are intended for use in treatment of the following:

1. Advanced joint destruction resulting from degenerative, posttraumatic or rheumatoid arthritis.

Fracture or avascular necrosis of the femoral head.

3. Failed previous surgery, e.g. osteosynthesis, joint reconstruction, arthrodesis, hemiarthroplasty and total hip replacement.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K993259: Inter-OP Durasul Acetabular Inserts/Cocr Femoral Heads.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K993259

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026