510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Opus Spinal System

K993402510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 20, 199973-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3070

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · MNI Orthosis, Spinal Pedicle Fixation

Cleared on Dec 20, 1999 as substantially equivalent to K951725 (Osteonics Corp., 1995) after a 73-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1995. 2 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Dec 20, 1999
Review
73 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MNI
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K951725 (1995). 2 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2002: 1 descendant cleared2003: 1 descendant clearedK951725 · Osteonics Spinal System · Osteonics Corp. · 19951995200020052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 2 descendants K951725 · Osteonics Spinal System · Osteonics Corp. · 19950
  1. Root · 1 generation backK951725 Osteonics Spinal SystemOsteonics Corp. · 1995
  2. This deviceK993402 Opus Spinal SystemHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 1999
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK014229 Modification to Opus Spinal SystemHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2002
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK030369 Opus Spinal SystemHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2003

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K014229Modification to Opus Spinal SystemHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2002 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K030369Opus Spinal SystemHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2003 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K951725Osteonics Spinal SystemOsteonics Corp.1995—
0 (this device)K993402Opus Spinal SystemHowmedica Osteonics Corp.1999—
+1K014229Modification to Opus Spinal SystemHowmedica Osteonics Corp.2002—
+1K030369Opus Spinal SystemHowmedica Osteonics Corp.2003—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200210
200310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K993402, 1995–2003Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MNI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K951725Osteonics Spinal System
Summary page 1
…pinal System are substantially equivalent to features of the following Howmedica Osteonics predicate device, which has been cleared for marketing via the 510(k) process (K951725): ® Osteonics® Spinal System Device Description The Opus™ Spinal System is a spinal fixation device for the noncervical spine.…
Osteonics Corp.1995—

Also cleared against K951725: 15 other devices →

What descends from it? (2)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K014229Modification to Opus Spinal SystemHowmedica Osteonics Corp.20021
K030369Opus Spinal SystemHowmedica Osteonics Corp.20030

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K014229 (Howmedica Osteonics Corp., 2002) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
  • 15 other devices also cite its predicate K951725.

How does its category compare?

All MNI devices

MNI Orthosis, Spinal Pedicle Fixation: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MNI

1in 2017

2007: 202008: 232009: 182010: 162011: 172012: 192013: 142014: 62015: 122016: 72017: 1
2007high 23 (2008) · low 0 (2018)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MNI

168in 2016

2007: 82 days median2008: 64 days median2009: 86 days median2010: 74 days median2011: 111 days median2012: 75 days median2013: 77 days median2014: 104 days median2015: 54 days median2016: 168 days median
2007high 168 (2016) · low 54 (2015)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MNI

1in 2018

2007: 262008: 82009: 32010: 12012: 12013: 42015: 12018: 1
2007high 26 (2007) · low 0 (2011)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MNI

80in 2025

2007: 832008: 1082009: 1382010: 1262011: 1462012: 2002013: 8242014: 3012015: 2602016: 1172017: 2472018: 1342019: 1882020: 1152021: 2702022: 2142023: 1222024: 1142025: 80
2007high 824 (2013) · low 80 (2025)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MNI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200720822683
200823648108
200918863138
201016741126
2011171110146
201219751200
201314774824
201461040301
201512541260
201671680117
20171—0247
20180—1134
20190—0188
20200—0115
20210—0270
20220—0214
20230—0122
20240—0114
20250—080
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

When used as a pedicle screw fixation system of the non-cervical posterior spine in skeletally mature patients, the Opus™ Spinal System is indicated for one or more of the following: degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurological impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). In addition, the Opus™ Spinal System is indicated for pedicle screw fixation in…

Read the full statement (114 words)

When used as a pedicle screw fixation system of the non-cervical posterior spine in skeletally mature patients, the Opus™ Spinal System is indicated for one or more of the following: degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurological impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis).

In addition, the Opus™ Spinal System is indicated for pedicle screw fixation in skeletally mature patients with severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) at the L5-S1 joint, having fusions using autogenous bone graft, having the device fixed or attached to the lumbar and sacral spine (with pedicle placement at L3 and below) with removal of the implants after the development of a solid fusion mass.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K993402: Opus Spinal System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K993402

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026