510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Synergy Integral Screws, Model Numbers 2161,2162,2163,2164,2165,2166,2167,2168,2169,2210,2211,2212,2215,2216,2217,2220

K993808510(k) SpecialCleared Dec 6, 199926-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3070

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Interpore Cross Intl. · MNH Orthosis, Spondylolisthesis Spinal Fixation

Cleared on Dec 6, 1999 after a 26-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 3 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Dec 6, 1999
Review
26 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MNH
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

3 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2017: 1 descendant cleared2018: 1 descendant cleared2024: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK993808 Synergy Integral Screws, Model Numbers…Interpore Cross Intl. · 1999
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK161225 Paonan Armstrong Posterior Spinal Fixation SystemPaonan Biotech Co., Ltd. · 2017
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK180226 TREND II Spinal Fixation System- STEP SeriesPaonan Biotech Co., Ltd. · 2018
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 0 of its ownK240233 Pitkar Spinal Pedicle Screw SystemS.H.Pitkar Orthotools Pvt., Ltd. · 2024

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K161225Paonan Armstrong Posterior Spinal Fixation SystemPaonan Biotech Co., Ltd. · 2017 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K180226TREND II Spinal Fixation System- STEP SeriesPaonan Biotech Co., Ltd. · 2018 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K240233Pitkar Spinal Pedicle Screw SystemS.H.Pitkar Orthotools Pvt., Ltd. · 2024 · 3 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K993808Synergy Integral Screws, Model Numbers…Interpore Cross Intl.1999—
+1K161225Paonan Armstrong Posterior Spinal Fixation SystemPaonan Biotech Co., Ltd.2017—
+2K180226TREND II Spinal Fixation System- STEP SeriesPaonan Biotech Co., Ltd.2018—
+3K240233Pitkar Spinal Pedicle Screw SystemS.H.Pitkar Orthotools Pvt., Ltd.2024—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201710
201810
202410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K993808, 1999–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MNH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Zimmer Harrington® Spinal System
Named without a submission number
—
*—INTERPORE CROSS International Synergy™ Spinal System
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (3)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K161225Paonan Armstrong Posterior Spinal Fixation SystemPaonan Biotech Co., Ltd.20172

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K161225 (Paonan Biotech Co., Ltd., 2017) has gone furthest, with 2 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MNH devices

MNH Orthosis, Spondylolisthesis Spinal Fixation: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MNH

8in 2016

2007: 52008: 132009: 132010: 102011: 172012: 72013: 102014: 122015: 102016: 8
2007high 17 (2011) · low 0 (2017)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MNH

93in 2016

2007: 123 days median2008: 65 days median2009: 151 days median2010: 106 days median2011: 171 days median2012: 93 days median2013: 124 days median2014: 140 days median2015: 99 days median2016: 93 days median
2007high 171 (2011) · low 65 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MNH

1in 2016

2009: 72012: 12013: 12016: 1
2007high 7 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MNH

89in 2025

2007: 182008: 302009: 452010: 592011: 1072012: 4332013: 4642014: 2862015: 1522016: 2162017: 1742018: 1292019: 4032020: 4322021: 5312022: 2652023: 1212024: 3022025: 89
2007high 531 (2021) · low 18 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MNH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20075123018
20081365030
200913151745
201010106059
2011171710107
20127931433
2013101241464
2014121400286
201510990152
20168931216
20170—0174
20180—0129
20190—0403
20200—0432
20210—0531
20220—0265
20230—0121
20240—0302
20250—089
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Synergy™ Spinal System implants are intended to be used as a temporary construct that assists normal healing and are not intended to replace normal body structures. They are intended to stabilize the spinal operative site during fusion procedures and should be removed after fusion. The implants are attached to the spine posteriorly by means of hooks and/or screws joined with rods and anteriorly by means of vertebral screws joined with rods. As a…

Read the full statement (449 words)

The Synergy™ Spinal System implants are intended to be used as a temporary construct that assists normal healing and are not intended to replace normal body structures. They are intended to stabilize the spinal operative site during fusion procedures and should be removed after fusion.

The implants are attached to the spine posteriorly by means of hooks and/or screws joined with rods and anteriorly by means of vertebral screws joined with rods.

As a pedicle screw system, the Synergy Spinal System is intended only for patients: (a) having severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) of the fifth lumbar-first sacral (L5-S1) vertebral joint; (b) who are having the screws fixed or attached to the lumbar and sacral spine; (c) who are receiving fusions using autogenous bone graft only; and (d) who are having the device removed after the development of a solid fusion mass. The levels of screw fixation are L3 to S1/Ilium.

In addition, the pedicle screw system may also be used to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments, in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: degenerative spbndylolisthesis -with objective evidence of neurologic impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis).

As a posterior, non-pedicle, screw and hook system, and an anterolateral, intervertebral body screw system, the specific indications for the Synergy Spinal System are:

1. Degenerative Disc Disease (as defined by chronic back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies).

2. Idiopathic scoliosis.

3. Kyphotic deformities of the spine.

4. Paralytic scoliosis and/or pelvic obliquity.

5. Lordotic deformities of the spine.

6. Neuromuscular scoliosis associated with pelvic obliquity.

7. Vertebral fracture or dislocation.

8. Tumors.

9. Spondylolisthesis.

10. Stenosis.

11. Pseudarthrosis.

12. Unsuccessful previous attempts at spinal fusion.

For posterior, non-pedicle, screw use, the Synergy screws and lateral connectors are intended for sacral/iliac attachment only, and the Synergy™ hooks and transverse connectors are intended for posterior thoracic and/or lumbar use only. As a whole, the levels of use are T1 to the Sacrum/Ilium

The Adjustable Length Rod is intended for in situ adjustment after placement of the hooks or screws during spinal fusion surgery.

For anterior use, the recommended levels of attachment are: T10 — L3 for the double rod constructs and T5 — LS for the single rod construct. The 4.75 mm diameter rod system can be used in single and double rod constructs while the 6.35mm diameter rod system is to only be used in single rod constructs. In all cases, instrumentation must be at least 1 cm from any major vessel.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K993808: Synergy Integral Screws, Model Numbers 2161,2162,2163,2164,2165,2166,2167,2168,2169,2210,2211,2212,2215,2216,2217,2220.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K993808

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026