510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Autodose Infusion System, Model AD4120, BE4210, S12050,100,200, FF0005, 10

K993832510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 9, 200089-day reviewClass II21 CFR 880.5725

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Tandem Medical, Inc. · MEB Pump, Infusion, Elastomeric

Cleared on Feb 9, 2000 as substantially equivalent to K990889 (Tandem Medical, Inc., 1999) after an 89-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1992.

Decided
Feb 9, 2000
Review
89 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MEB
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K915646 (1992). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 3 generations backK915646 Vivus 50 and Vivus 100 Personal InfuserI-Flow Corp. · 1992
  2. 2 generations backK962663 Solopak Sidekick Infusion Pump and Administation SetSolopak Medical Products, Inc. · 1996
  3. 1 generation backK990889 Autodose Infusion SystemTandem Medical, Inc. · 1999
  4. This deviceK993832 Autodose Infusion System, Model AD4120, BE4210, S12050,100,200…Tandem Medical, Inc. · 2000
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K915646Vivus 50 and Vivus 100 Personal InfuserI-Flow Corp.1992—
−2K962663Solopak Sidekick Infusion Pump and Administation SetSolopak Medical Products, Inc.1996—
−1K990889Autodose Infusion SystemTandem Medical, Inc.1999—
0 (this device)K993832Autodose Infusion System, Model AD4120, BE4210, S12050,100,200, FF0005, 10Tandem Medical, Inc.2000—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K993832, 1992–2000Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MEB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MEB device

  1. #1 K250234 SMARTeZ™ Elastomeric Infusion Pump (RS series)score 14.5 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K990889Autodose Infusion System
Summary page 1
…. b. Classification Name: Infusion Pump 21 CFR 880.5725 15.3 IDENTIFICATION OF PREDICATE DEVICES Company Device 510(k) No. Date Cleared Tandem AutoDose™ Infusion System K990889 June 3, 1999 Medical Inc. 154 DEVICE DESCRIPTION The AutoDose Infusion System was designed to infuse Intravenous solutions of p…
Tandem Medical, Inc.1999—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 8 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.7 years on median.
  • None of the 3 ancestors has a recall.

How does its category compare?

All MEB devices

MEB Pump, Infusion, Elastomeric: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MEB

2in 2024

2007: 52008: 22009: 12013: 12014: 12016: 12019: 12024: 22026 (partial year): 1
2007high 5 (2007) · low 0 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MEB

42in 2007

2007: 42 days median
2007high 42 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MEB

17in 2018

2007: 12008: 32009: 482010: 22011: 8, 1 Class I2013: 2, 1 Class I2018: 17
2007high 48 (2009) · low 0 (2012)2026

Class I (2 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MEB

1,408in 2025

2007: 1102008: 4442009: 7982010: 1,8272011: 2,2652012: 1,9762013: 1,9562014: 2,6952015: 2,9802016: 2,1472017: 1,6532018: 1,4732019: 9742020: 2,7322021: 1,8022022: 1,2882023: 1,2482024: 1,4242025: 1,408
2007high 2,980 (2015) · low 110 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MEB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20075421110
20082—3444
20091—48798
20100—21,827
20110—8 (1)2,265
20120—01,976
20131—2 (1)1,956
20141—02,695
20150—02,980
20161—02,147
20170—01,653
20180—171,473
20191—0974
20200—02,732
20210—01,802
20220—01,288
20230—01,248
20242—01,424
20250—01,408
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

The AutoDose Infusion system is intended for sequential infusion of predetermined volumes of intravenous solutions including 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, (NaCl), and Heparin Lock Flush Solution, USP solutions,

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K993832: Autodose Infusion System, Model AD4120, BE4210, S12050,100,200, FF0005, 10.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K993832

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026