510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

2010 Plus Holter for Windows

K010949510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 28, 2001183-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2800

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Agilent Technologies · MLO Electrocardiograph, Ambulatory, With Analysis Algorithm

Cleared on Sep 28, 2001 as substantially equivalent to K990170 (Zymed Medical Instrumentation, 1999) and 1 other predicate after a 183-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1994. 85 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Sep 28, 2001
Review
183 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MLO
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K930806 (1994). 4 ancestors in all. 85 later devices descend from it, 5 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1998: 1 other ancestor2007: 3 descendants cleared2005: 3 descendants cleared2004: 1 descendant cleared2025: 6 descendants cleared2009: 2 descendants cleared2006: 1 descendant cleared2015: 7 descendants cleared2010: 2 descendants cleared2014: 4 descendants cleared2008: 2 descendants cleared2012: 2 descendants cleared2011: 2 descendants cleared2020: 6 descendants cleared2016: 7 descendants cleared2013: 3 descendants cleared2018: 2 descendants cleared2017: 7 descendants cleared2022: 4 descendants cleared2021: 4 descendants cleared2019: 4 descendants cleared2026: 4 descendants cleared2023: 7 descendants cleared2024: 2 descendants clearedK930806 · Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010 · Agilent Technologies · 1994K955015 · Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010 · Zymed Medical Instrumentation · 1996K990170 · Holter 2000 · Zymed Medical Instrumentation · 19991990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 5 descendants2 generations forward: 11 descendants3 generations forward: 17 descendants4 generations forward: 14 descendants5 generations forward: 19 descendants6 generations forward: 9 descendants7 generations forward: 6 descendants8 generations forward: 2 descendants9 generations forward: 1 descendant10 generations forward: 1 descendant K990170 · Holter 2000 · Zymed Medical Instrumentation · 1999K955015 · Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010 · Zymed Medical Instrumentation · 1996K930806 · Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010 · Agilent Technologies · 19940+5+10
  1. Root · 3 generations backK930806 Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010Agilent Technologies · 1994
  2. 2 generations backK955015 Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010Zymed Medical Instrumentation · 1996
  3. 1 generation backK990170 Holter 2000Zymed Medical Instrumentation · 1999
  4. This deviceK010949 2010 Plus Holter for WindowsAgilent Technologies · 2001
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 46 of its ownK042108 Vista PlusNovacor · 2005
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 40 of its ownK071641 Reveal XT; Insertable Cardiac Monitor (Model 9529), Patient…Medtronic, Inc. · 2007
  7. Descendant · 2 generations on · 30 of its ownK071655 Reveal DX Insertable Cardiac Monitor, Reveal Patient Assistant…Medtronic, Inc. · 2007
  8. Descendant · 3 generations on · 28 of its ownK082475 Reveal XT Insertable Cardiac Monitor, Model 9529, Revel DX…Medtronic, Inc. · 2008
  9. Descendant · 3 generations on · 26 of its ownK103764 Reveal XT Insertable Cardiac Monitor, Model 9529 and Reveal DX…Medtronic, Inc. · 2011

Showing 5 of 85 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2004: 12005: 32006: 12007: 32008: 22009: 22010: 22011: 22012: 22013: 32014: 42015: 72016: 72017: 72018: 22019: 42020: 62021: 42022: 42023: 72024: 22025: 62026: 4
2004high 7 (2015) · low 1 (2004)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 85 · See all
  • K042108Vista PlusNovacor · 2005 · cites it directly46descendants
  • K071641Reveal XT; Insertable Cardiac Monitor (Model 9529), Patient Assistant (Model 9539)Medtronic, Inc. · 2007 · 2 generations on40descendants
  • K071655Reveal DX Insertable Cardiac Monitor, Reveal Patient Assistant, Model (S) 9528,9538Medtronic, Inc. · 2007 · 2 generations on30descendants
  • K082475Reveal XT Insertable Cardiac Monitor, Model 9529, Revel DX Insertable Cardiac Monitor…Medtronic, Inc. · 2008 · 3 generations on28descendants
  • K103764Reveal XT Insertable Cardiac Monitor, Model 9529 and Reveal DX Insertable Cardiac…Medtronic, Inc. · 2011 · 3 generations on26descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K930806Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010Agilent Technologies1994—
−2K955015Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010Zymed Medical Instrumentation1996—
−1K990170Holter 2000Zymed Medical Instrumentation1999—
0 (this device)K0109492010 Plus Holter for WindowsAgilent Technologies2001—
+1K042108Vista PlusNovacor2005—
+2K071641Reveal XT; Insertable Cardiac Monitor (Model 9529), Patient Assistant (Model…Medtronic, Inc.2007—
+2K071655Reveal DX Insertable Cardiac Monitor, Reveal Patient Assistant, Model (S)…Medtronic, Inc.2007—
+3K082475Reveal XT Insertable Cardiac Monitor, Model 9529, Revel DX Insertable Cardiac…Medtronic, Inc.2008—
+3K103764Reveal XT Insertable Cardiac Monitor, Model 9529 and Reveal DX Insertable…Medtronic, Inc.2011—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199810

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200410
200530
200610
200730
200820
200920
201020
201120
201220
201330
201440
201570
201670
201770
201820
201940
202060
202140
202240
202370
202420
202560
202640
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K010949, 1994–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MLO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MLO device

  1. #1 K261580 ZBPro Diagnostic (Version 2.0)score 13.8 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K990170Holter 2000
Summary page 1
…cardiograph, ambulatory, with analysis algorithm (per 21 CFR 870.2800) Legally marketed device to which S.E. is claimed. Zymed Holter Scanner Model Holter 2000 — 510(k) K990170 Marquette Medical System’s QT Guard Analysis System — 510(k) 981024 Description: The 2010 Plus Holter for Windows is a device th…
Zymed Medical Instrumentation1999—
*K981024QT Dispersion and T Wave Analysis Program (QT Guard Analysis System)
Summary page 1
…) Legally marketed device to which S.E. is claimed. Zymed Holter Scanner Model Holter 2000 — 510(k) K990170 Marquette Medical System’s QT Guard Analysis System — 510(k) 981024 Description: The 2010 Plus Holter for Windows is a device that analyzes recorded cardiac ECG and creates reports from the record…
Marquette Medical Systems, Inc.1998—

Also cleared against K990170: 3 other devices →

What descends from it? (85)

See all 85

5 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K042108Vista PlusNovacor200546
K031517Zargis Acoustic CardioscanZargis Medical Corp.200419
K051026Mars Holter Analysis WorkstationGe Medical Systems Information Technologies20058
K070260Star ST and Arrhythmia Software, Release H.0Philips Medical Systems20077
K241890Philips Holter Analysis SystemPhilips Medizin Systeme Böblingen GmbH20250

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 7 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.5 years on median.
  • None of the 4 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K042108 (Novacor, 2005) has gone furthest, with 46 descendants of its own.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K990170.

How does its category compare?

All MLO devices

MLO Electrocardiograph, Ambulatory, With Analysis Algorithm: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MLO

1in 2025

2007: 12010: 12011: 32012: 12013: 22014: 12018: 12020: 22024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 3 (2011) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MLO

238in 2011

2011: 238 days median
2007high 238 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MLO

2in 2024

2024: 2
2007high 2 (2024) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MLO

4in 2025

2009: 52010: 12011: 12014: 12017: 12018: 12019: 12021: 12022: 12023: 12024: 22025: 4
2007high 5 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MLO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20080—00
20090—05
20101—01
2011323801
20121—00
20132—00
20141—01
20150—00
20160—00
20170—01
20181—01
20190—01
20202—00
20210—01
20220—01
20230—01
20241—22
20251—04
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

Assessment of symptoms that may be related to rhythm disturbances of the heart in patients from pediatric to adult age. Patients with palpitations. Assessment of risk in Patients With or Without Symptoms of Arrhythmia. Patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic idiopathic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and postmyocardial infarction patient with left ventricular dysfunction using arrhythmia e.g.: ventricular ectopy, as method of risk assessment. Assessment of…

Read the full statement (237 words)

Assessment of symptoms that may be related to rhythm disturbances of the heart in patients from pediatric to adult age. Patients with palpitations.

Assessment of risk in Patients With or Without Symptoms of Arrhythmia. Patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic idiopathic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and postmyocardial infarction patient with left ventricular dysfunction using arrhythmia e.g.: ventricular ectopy, as method of risk assessment.

Assessment of efficacy of Antiarrhythmia Therapy. Patients with baseline high frequency, reproducible, sustained, symptomatic premature ventricular complexes supraventricular arrhythmia or ventricular tachycardia.

Assessment of Pacemaker Function. Evaluation of patients with paroxysmal symptoms, detection of myopotential inhibition, detection of pacemaker mediated tachycardia, evaluation of antitachycardia pacing device function, evaluation of rate-responsive physiological pacing function.

Detection of Myocardial Ischemia. Patients with chest pain suggestive of Prinzmetal’s angina.

Assessment of EASI derived 12-lead ST measurements is recommended for patients that meet the following parameters.

1. Ages: 33 to 82 years

2. Heights: 147 to 185 cm (58 to 73 in)

3. Weights: 53 to 118 kg (117 to 261 Ib)

4. Height to Weight ratios: 1.41 to 2.99 cm/kg ( 0.25 to 0.54 in/Ib.)

QT measurements can be used by the physician in risk assessment process indicated for patients with and without symptoms of arrhythmia. QT measurement is intended to be used by competent health professionals in hospital or clinic environment. Composite QT measures the interval only and is not intended to produce any interpretation or diagnosis of those measurements.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K010949: 2010 Plus Holter for Windows.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K010949

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026