510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Zymed Telemetry System: Model Easiview

K990093510(k) TraditionalCleared May 11, 1999120-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.1025

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Agilent Technologies · DSI Detector And Alarm, Arrhythmia

Cleared on May 11, 1999 as substantially equivalent to K980186 (Agilent Technologies, 1998) and 1 other predicate after a 120-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1994.

Decided
May 11, 1999
Review
120 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DSI
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K930806 (1994). 4 ancestors in all, the oldest K930004 (1993). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1993: 1 other ancestor1995: 1 other ancestorK930806 · Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010 · Agilent Technologies · 1994K980186 · Zymed Telemetry System · Agilent Technologies · 1998199019921994199619982000
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 1 other ancestor K980186 · Zymed Telemetry System · Agilent Technologies · 1998K930806 · Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010 · Agilent Technologies · 19940
  1. Root · 2 generations backK930806 Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010Agilent Technologies · 1994
  2. 1 generation backK980186 Zymed Telemetry SystemAgilent Technologies · 1998
  3. This deviceK990093 Zymed Telemetry System: Model EasiviewAgilent Technologies · 1999
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K930806Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010Agilent Technologies1994—
−1K980186Zymed Telemetry SystemAgilent Technologies1998—
0 (this device)K990093Zymed Telemetry System: Model EasiviewAgilent Technologies1999—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199310
199510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K990093, 1994–1999Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DSI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DSI device

  1. #1 K243349 BodyGuardian Remote Monitoring System (BGRMS…score 13.1 · 9 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K980186Zymed Telemetry System
Summary page 1
…ification Name: Detection and Alarm, Arrhythmia (per 21 CFR 870.1025) Legally marketed device to which S.E. is claimed. Zymed Telemetry System: Model EasiView — 510(k) K 980186 Medical Data Electronics: Escort 100/300 Series B Patient Monitor System — 510(k) K930004/A Description: A Zymed Telemetry monit…
Agilent Technologies1998—
*K930004Escort 100/300 Series B Patient Monitors
Summary page 1
…vice to which S.E. is claimed. Zymed Telemetry System: Model EasiView — 510(k) K 980186 Medical Data Electronics: Escort 100/300 Series B Patient Monitor System — 510(k) K930004/A Description: A Zymed Telemetry monitoring system consists of a series of interface devices to include ECG transmitters, multi-…
Medical Data Electronics1993—

Also cleared against K980186: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 5 years and passes through 1 company; a new generation was cleared every 4.5 years on median.
  • None of the 4 ancestors has a recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K980186.

How does its category compare?

All DSI devices

DSI Detector And Alarm, Arrhythmia: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DSI

1in 2025

2007: 72008: 52009: 62010: 62011: 62012: 32013: 12014: 42015: 92016: 62018: 22019: 32020: 22023: 22024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 9 (2015) · low 0 (2017)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DSI

243in 2019

2007: 151 days median2008: 70 days median2009: 73 days median2010: 111 days median2011: 114 days median2012: 113 days median2014: 200 days median2015: 127 days median2016: 224 days median2019: 243 days median
2007high 243 (2019) · low 70 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DSI

18in 2025

2007: 42008: 82009: 32010: 52011: 32012: 12018: 12019: 42020: 22022: 12023: 22025: 182026 (partial year): 1
2007high 18 (2025) · low 0 (2013)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DSI

712in 2025

2007: 642008: 1562009: 2792010: 8232011: 7932012: 7662013: 7952014: 1,0002015: 1,6452016: 4,3522017: 3,5942018: 3,6482019: 3,4852020: 3,0842021: 3,0922022: 1,6382023: 1,6162024: 1,3202025: 712
2007high 4,352 (2016) · low 64 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DSI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20077151464
20085708156
20096733279
201061115823
201161143793
201231131766
20131—0795
2014420001,000
2015912701,645
2016622404,352
20170—03,594
20182—13,648
2019324343,485
20202—23,084
20210—03,092
20220—11,638
20232—21,616
20241—01,320
20251—18712
20261—1—

What is it indicated for?

Assessment of symptoms that may be related to rhythm disturbances of the heart; Patients with palpitations; The evaluations of arrhythmia’s in patients from pediatric to adult age. Assessment of risk in patients with or without symptoms of arrhythmia. Assessment of efficacy of Antiarrhythmia therapy. Assessment of Pacemaker Function. Assessment of real time ST segment analysis. Assessment of symptomatic or asymptomatic patients, to evaluate for, ischemic…

Read the full statement (155 words)

Assessment of symptoms that may be related to rhythm disturbances of the heart; Patients with palpitations; The evaluations of arrhythmia’s in patients from pediatric to adult age.

Assessment of risk in patients with or without symptoms of arrhythmia.

Assessment of efficacy of Antiarrhythmia therapy.

Assessment of Pacemaker Function.

Assessment of real time ST segment analysis.

Assessment of symptomatic or asymptomatic patients, to evaluate for, ischemic heart disease and arrhythmias analysis during exercise testing.

Assessment of transferred SpO2 level data from an MDE Escort Bedside monitor to EasiView for display and alarm.,

Assessment of transferred invasive and Non-invasive blood pressure, both systolic and diastolic, data from an MDE Escort Bedside monitor to EasiView for display and alarm.

Assessment of transferred temperature parameter data from an MDE Escort Bedside monitor to EasiView for display and alarm.

Assessment of transferred respiration data from an MDE Escort Bedside monitor to EasiView for display.

Assessment is indicated for single-hospital environment.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K990093: Zymed Telemetry System: Model Easiview.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K990093

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026