510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2013

Autopulse, Model 100

K011046510(k) TraditionalCleared Oct 25, 2001202-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.5200Recalls 2

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Revivant Corp. · DRM Compressor, Cardiac, External

Cleared on Oct 25, 2001 after a 202-day review. FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known. 2 of the 18 devices in its family, counting itself, have a Class I recall. 17 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 2 times.

Decided
Oct 25, 2001
Review
202 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DRM
Recalls
2
Predicates
0

17 later devices descend from it, 4 citing it directly. 2 of the 18 devices in this family, counting this one, have a Class I recall.

Descendants, by year cleared 2004: 1 descendant cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2003: 1 descendant cleared2002: 1 descendant cleared2006: 3 descendants cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared, 1 with a Class I recall12009: 1 descendant cleared2008: 1 descendant cleared2007: 2 descendants cleared2016: 2 descendants cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2018: 1 descendant cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared, 1 with a Class I recall1200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK011046 Autopulse, Model 100Revivant Corp. · 2001
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 16 of its ownK022345 Autopulse Resuscitation SystemRevivant Corp. · 2002 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 15 of its ownK032852 Modification to: Autopulse Resuscitation System Model 100Revivant Corp. · 2003 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 14 of its ownK040453 Autopulse Resuscitation System, Model 100Revivant Corp. · 2004 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 11 of its ownK063602 Autopulse Resuscitation System MODEL100Zoll Circulation · 2006 · Recalled
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 7 of its ownK053403 LUCASJolife AB · 2006

Showing 5 of 17 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2002: 12003: 12004: 12006: 32007: 22008: 12009: 12012: 12014: 12016: 22018: 12021: 12023: 1
2002high 3 (2006) · low 0 (2005)2026

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 17 · See all
  • K022345Autopulse Resuscitation SystemRevivant Corp. · 2002 · cites it directly16descendants
  • K032852Modification to: Autopulse Resuscitation System Model 100Revivant Corp. · 2003 · cites it directly15descendants
  • K040453Autopulse Resuscitation System, Model 100Revivant Corp. · 2004 · cites it directly14descendants
  • K063602Autopulse Resuscitation System MODEL100Zoll Circulation · 2006 · 2 generations on11descendants
  • K053403LUCASJolife AB · 2006 · 2 generations on7descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K011046Autopulse, Model 100Revivant Corp.2001—
+1K022345Autopulse Resuscitation SystemRevivant Corp.20022
+1K032852Modification to: Autopulse Resuscitation System Model 100Revivant Corp.20032
+1K040453Autopulse Resuscitation System, Model 100Revivant Corp.20042
+2K063602Autopulse Resuscitation System MODEL100Zoll Circulation20061
+2K053403LUCASJolife AB2006—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200210
200310
200410
200630
200720
200810
200910
201210
201410
201620
201810
202111
202311
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K011046, 2001–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

2 devices in this family have a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DRM device

  1. #1 K221700 AutoPulse NXT Resuscitation Systemscore -7.5 · 6 generations · Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it? (17)

See all 17

4 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K022345Autopulse Resuscitation SystemRevivant Corp.200216
K032852Modification to: Autopulse Resuscitation System Model 100Revivant Corp.200315
K040453Autopulse Resuscitation System, Model 100Revivant Corp.200414
K112998Autopulse Resuscitation System Model 1000Zoll Circulation20121

Has anything in its family been recalled? (2 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jul 16, 2013Class IIIZ-2090-2014Labeling Change ControlTypographical error in the Japanese legal label of the AutoPulse Resuscitation System Model 100. The label is specific to the Japanese version of the product.
Aug 8, 2012Class IIZ-0658-2013Employee errorComplaints associated with an unexpected stop in AutoPulse compressions.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K221700AutoPulse NXT Resuscitation SystemZoll Circulation, Inc. · 2023 · 2 generations on · ◆ in the 2023 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall
  • K211289RMU-2000 Automated Chest Compression SystemDefibtech, LLC · 2021 · 6 generations on · ◆ in the 2021 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K022345 (Revivant Corp., 2002) has gone furthest, with 16 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All DRM devices

DRM Compressor, Cardiac, External: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DRM

1in 2023

2008: 22009: 12010: 12012: 12014: 12016: 22018: 12021: 12023: 1
2007high 2 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DRM

Too few DRM 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · DRM

1in 2022

2008: 12011: 12012: 12022: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 1 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DRM

690in 2025

2007: 82008: 132009: 92010: 72011: 162012: 4832013: 1,2682014: 6642015: 6742016: 6392017: 6792018: 7832019: 7062020: 8442021: 7552022: 7302023: 7652024: 7102025: 690
2007high 1,268 (2013) · low 7 (2010)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DRM, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—08
20082—113
20091—09
20101—07
20110—116
20121—1483
20130—01,268
20141—0664
20150—0674
20162—0639
20170—0679
20181—0783
20190—0706
20200—0844
20211—0755
20220—1730
20231—0765
20240—0710
20250—0690
20260—1—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K011046: Autopulse, Model 100.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K011046

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026