510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · 2004

E-Z EM Percupump 2001 CT Injector

K011160510(k) SpecialCleared May 16, 200130-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1750Recalls 3

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

E-Z-Em, Inc. · JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed

Cleared on May 16, 2001 after a 30-day review. FDA lists a 510(k) statement for it but has not posted the file, so its predicates are not known. 4 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 3 times.

Decided
May 16, 2001
Review
30 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JAK
Recalls
3
Predicates
0

4 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2003: 1 descendant cleared2007: 1 descendant cleared2006: 1 descendant cleared2026: 1 descendant cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK011160 E-Z EM Percupump 2001 CT InjectorE-Z-Em, Inc. · 2001
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 3 of its ownK031571 Empowercta Injector System, Models 9930 & 9910 & 9825E-Z-Em, Inc. · 2003 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK063029 Empower CT/Cta Injector System, Model 9800/9900E-Z-Em, Inc. · 2006
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK071378 Modification to Empower CT/Cta Injector System, Models 9800/9900…E-Z-Em, Inc. · 2007
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK262115 VueJect® Ultrasound Enhancing Agent Delivery SystemACIST Medical Systems, Inc. · 2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 4 of 4 · See all
  • K031571Empowercta Injector System, Models 9930 & 9910 & 9825E-Z-Em, Inc. · 2003 · cites it directly3descendants
  • K063029Empower CT/Cta Injector System, Model 9800/9900E-Z-Em, Inc. · 2006 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K071378Modification to Empower CT/Cta Injector System, Models 9800/9900 Product SeriesE-Z-Em, Inc. · 2007 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K262115VueJect® Ultrasound Enhancing Agent Delivery SystemACIST Medical Systems, Inc. · 2026 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K011160E-Z EM Percupump 2001 CT InjectorE-Z-Em, Inc.2001—
+1K031571Empowercta Injector System, Models 9930 & 9910 & 9825E-Z-Em, Inc.20033
+1K063029Empower CT/Cta Injector System, Model 9800/9900E-Z-Em, Inc.2006—
+1K071378Modification to Empower CT/Cta Injector System, Models 9800/9900 Product SeriesE-Z-Em, Inc.2007—
+2K262115VueJect® Ultrasound Enhancing Agent Delivery SystemACIST Medical Systems, Inc.2026—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200310
200610
200710
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K011160, 2001–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in JAK? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new JAK device

  1. #1 K230223 iCAC Devicescore 23.5 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA lists a 510(k) statement for it but has not posted the file, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it? (4)

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K031571Empowercta Injector System, Models 9930 & 9910 & 9825E-Z-Em, Inc.20033
K063029Empower CT/Cta Injector System, Model 9800/9900E-Z-Em, Inc.20062
K071378Modification to Empower CT/Cta Injector System, Models 9800/9900 Product SeriesE-Z-Em, Inc.20071

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Dec 3, 2004Not classifiedZ-0548-05OtherOut of specification welding could cause the ceiling mount accessory to detach from its mounting. The firm received 1 complaint from a hospital that the injector fell off the ceiling mounting bracket and landed on the floor.
Dec 3, 2004Not classifiedZ-0549-05OtherOut of specification welding could cause the ceiling mount accessory to detach from its mounting. The firm received 1 complaint from a hospital that the injector fell off the ceiling mounting bracket and landed on the floor.
Dec 3, 2004Not classifiedZ-0550-05OtherOut of specification welding could cause the ceiling mount accessory to detach from its mounting. The firm received 1 complaint from a hospital that the injector fell off the ceiling mounting bracket and landed on the floor.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K031571 (E-Z-Em, Inc., 2003) has gone furthest, with 3 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All JAK devices

JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · JAK

27in 2025

2007: 142008: 262009: 152010: 72011: 162012: 282013: 172014: 302015: 302016: 252017: 292018: 242019: 282020: 302021: 202022: 302023: 272024: 262025: 272026 (partial year): 21
2007high 30 (2014) · low 7 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · JAK

141in 2025

2007: 27 days median2008: 42 days median2009: 31 days median2010: 92 days median2011: 155 days median2012: 121 days median2013: 132 days median2014: 200 days median2015: 140 days median2016: 129 days median2017: 96 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 94 days median2020: 112 days median2021: 145 days median2022: 131 days median2023: 139 days median2024: 141 days median2025: 141 days median2026 (partial year): 167 days median
2007high 200 (2014) · low 27 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · JAK

17in 2025

2007: 112008: 162009: 292010: 512011: 342012: 232013: 112014: 102015: 282016: 442017: 332018: 102019: 52020: 82021: 152022: 92023: 92024: 202025: 172026 (partial year): 23
2007high 51 (2010) · low 5 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · JAK

219in 2025

2007: 762008: 1202009: 1052010: 1192011: 2052012: 1922013: 4142014: 3082015: 4542016: 3652017: 3382018: 5432019: 2332020: 1772021: 2612022: 1992023: 3102024: 2122025: 219
2007high 543 (2018) · low 76 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JAK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200714271176
2008264216120
2009153129105
201079251119
20111615534205
20122812123192
20131713211414
20143020010308
20153014028454
20162512944365
2017299633338
20182411410543
201928945233
2020301128177
20212014515261
2022301319199
2023271399310
20242614120212
20252714117219
20262116723—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K011160: E-Z EM Percupump 2001 CT Injector.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K011160

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026