510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

BodyTom 64 (NL4100); OmniTom Elite (NL5000)

K261125510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 22, 2026169-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1750

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Samsung HME America, Inc., dba NeuroLogica Corp. · JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed

Cleared on Sep 22, 2026 as substantially equivalent to K242811 (Neurologica Corporation, A Subsidiary of Samsung, 2025) and 1 other predicate after a 169-day review. Its family tree reaches back 11 generations to 1995. 1 of the 34 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall.

Decided
Sep 22, 2026
Review
169 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JAK
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 11 generations to K944131 (1995). 33 ancestors in all, the oldest K780395 (1978). No later device cites it as a predicate yet. 1 of the 34 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

  1. Root · 11 generations backK944131 Anatom 2000Analogic Corp. · 1995
  2. 7 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK170238 BodyTom EliteNeurologica Corporation, A Subsidiary of Samsung Electronics · 2017
  4. 2 generations backK213649 BodyTom 64Neurologica Corporation · 2022
  5. 1 generation backK242811 BodyTom 64Neurologica Corporation, A Subsidiary of Samsung · 2025
  6. This deviceK261125 BodyTom 64 (NL4100); OmniTom Elite (NL5000)Samsung HME America, Inc., dba NeuroLogica Corp. · 2026
Show all 11 generations
  1. Root · 11 generations backK944131 Anatom 2000Analogic Corp. · 1995
  2. 10 generations backK964890 Anatom 2000Analogic Corp. · 1997
  3. 9 generations backK982631 Philips Tomoscan CSPhilips Medical Systems, Inc. · 1998
  4. 8 generations backK991278 Philips Tomoscan AV-NTPhilips Medical Systems North America, Inc. · 1999
  5. 7 generations backK014240 ProntoHitachi Medical Systems America, Inc. · 2002
  6. 6 generations backK040902 Hitachi PrestoHitachi Medical Systems America, Inc. · 2004 · Recalled
  7. 5 generations backK071806 Eclos Computed Tomography X-Ray SystemHitachi Medical Systems America, Inc. · 2007 · Recalled
  8. 4 generations backK102677 Bodytom NL 4000Neurologica Corporation · 2011
  9. 3 generations backK170238 BodyTom EliteNeurologica Corporation, A Subsidiary of Samsung Electronics · 2017
  10. 2 generations backK213649 BodyTom 64Neurologica Corporation · 2022
  11. 1 generation backK242811 BodyTom 64Neurologica Corporation, A Subsidiary of Samsung · 2025
  12. This deviceK261125 BodyTom 64 (NL4100); OmniTom Elite (NL5000)Samsung HME America, Inc., dba NeuroLogica Corp. · 2026

Class I recalls in this family

View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−11K944131Anatom 2000Analogic Corp.1995—
−10K964890Anatom 2000Analogic Corp.1997—
−9K982631Philips Tomoscan CSPhilips Medical Systems, Inc.1998—
−8K991278Philips Tomoscan AV-NTPhilips Medical Systems North America, Inc.1999—
−7K014240ProntoHitachi Medical Systems America, Inc.2002—
−6K040902Hitachi PrestoHitachi Medical Systems America, Inc.20044
−5K071806Eclos Computed Tomography X-Ray SystemHitachi Medical Systems America, Inc.20071
−4K102677Bodytom NL 4000Neurologica Corporation2011—
−3K170238BodyTom EliteNeurologica Corporation, A Subsidiary of Samsung Electronics2017—
−2K213649BodyTom 64Neurologica Corporation2022—
−1K242811BodyTom 64Neurologica Corporation, A Subsidiary of Samsung2025—
0 (this device)K261125BodyTom 64 (NL4100); OmniTom Elite (NL5000)Samsung HME America, Inc., dba NeuroLogica Corp.2026—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
197810
199240
199420
199520
199611
199920
200020
200210
200510
200910
201710
202010
202210
202310
202410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K261125, 1995–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new JAK device

  1. #1 K230223 iCAC Devicescore 23.5 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K242811BodyTom 64
Summary page 5
…oduct Code: JAK Device Classification: Class II (per 21 CFR § 892.1750) Predicate Device Trade Name: BodyTom 64 (K242811) Classification Name: Computed Tomography X-ray System Product Code: JAK Device Classification…
Neurologica Corporation, A Subsidiary of Samsung2025—
*K233767OmniTom Elite
Summary page 6
…Samsung HME America, Inc. Page 1 of 11 Reference Device Trade Name: OmniTom Elite (K233767) Classification Name: Computed Tomography X-ray System Product Code: JAK Device Classification: C…
Neurologica Corporation2024—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K962738Millennium MT and Millennium MG Nuclear Medicine SystemsGE Medical Systems · 1996 · 7 generations back · ◆ in the 1996 ancestors bar of FIG. 13 Class I recalls

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 31 years and passes through 8 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.9 years on median.
  • 8 of the 33 ancestors have a recall of any class; 1 has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All JAK devices

JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2026, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · JAK

27in 2025

2007: 142008: 262009: 152010: 72011: 162012: 282013: 172014: 302015: 302016: 252017: 292018: 242019: 282020: 302021: 202022: 302023: 272024: 262025: 272026 (partial year): 21
2007high 30 (2014) · low 7 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · JAK

141in 2025

2007: 27 days median2008: 42 days median2009: 31 days median2010: 92 days median2011: 155 days median2012: 121 days median2013: 132 days median2014: 200 days median2015: 140 days median2016: 129 days median2017: 96 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 94 days median2020: 112 days median2021: 145 days median2022: 131 days median2023: 139 days median2024: 141 days median2025: 141 days median2026 (partial year): 167 days median
2007high 200 (2014) · low 27 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · JAK

17in 2025

2007: 112008: 162009: 292010: 512011: 342012: 232013: 112014: 102015: 282016: 442017: 332018: 102019: 52020: 82021: 152022: 92023: 92024: 202025: 172026 (partial year): 23
2007high 51 (2010) · low 5 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · JAK

219in 2025

2007: 762008: 1202009: 1052010: 1192011: 2052012: 1922013: 4142014: 3082015: 4542016: 3652017: 3382018: 5432019: 2332020: 1772021: 2612022: 1992023: 3102024: 2122025: 219
2007high 543 (2018) · low 76 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JAK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200714271176
2008264216120
2009153129105
201079251119
20111615534205
20122812123192
20131713211414
20143020010308
20153014028454
20162512944365
2017299633338
20182411410543
201928945233
2020301128177
20212014515261
2022301319199
2023271399310
20242614120212
20252714117219
20262116723—

What is it indicated for?

The BodyTom 64 system is intended to be used for x-ray computed tomography applications for anatomy that can be imaged in the 85cm aperture. The CT system is intended to be used for both pediatric and adult imaging and as such has preset dose settings based upon weight and age. The CT images can be obtained either with or without contrast. BodyTom 64 system can be used for low dose lung cancer screening. The screening must be performed in compliance with…

Read the full statement (187 words)

The BodyTom 64 system is intended to be used for x-ray computed tomography applications for anatomy that can be imaged in the 85cm aperture. The CT system is intended to be used for both pediatric and adult imaging and as such has preset dose settings based upon weight and age. The CT images can be obtained either with or without contrast. BodyTom 64 system can be used for low dose lung cancer screening. The screening must be performed in compliance with the approved and established protocols as defined by professional medical societies.

*Please refer to clinical literature, including the results of the National Lung Screening Trial (N Engl J Med 2011; 365:395-409) and subsequent literature, for further information.

The OmniTom Elite computed tomography (CT) system is intended to be used for X-ray computed tomography applications for anatomy that can be imaged in the 40cm aperture, primarily the head and neck.

The CT system is intended to be used for both pediatric and adult imaging and as such has preset dose settings based upon weight and age The CT images can be obtained either with or without contrast.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K261125: BodyTom 64 (NL4100); OmniTom Elite (NL5000).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K261125

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded Oct 30, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026