510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2019

Expedio 500D R&F X-Ray System

K011624510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 8, 200114-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1650Recalls 11

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

GE Medical Systems · JAA System, X-Ray, Fluoroscopic, Image-Intensified

Cleared on Jun 8, 2001 as substantially equivalent to K862120 (General Electric Co., 1986) and 2 other predicates after a 14-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1986. 4 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 11 times.

Decided
Jun 8, 2001
Review
14 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JAA
Recalls
11
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K862120 (1986). 3 ancestors in all. 4 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1997: 1 other ancestor1996: 1 other ancestor2008: 1 descendant cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2015: 1 descendant clearedK862120 · SCX System · General Electric Co. · 1986 · recalled1990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 1 descendant3 generations forward: 1 descendant4 generations forward: 1 descendant K862120 · SCX System · General Electric Co. · 1986 · recalled0
  1. Root · 1 generation backK862120 SCX SystemGeneral Electric Co. · 1986 · Recalled
  2. This deviceK011624 Expedio 500D R&F X-Ray SystemGE Medical Systems · 2001
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 3 of its ownK081091 Precision 500D R&F X-Ray SystemGE Healthcare · 2008 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 2 of its ownK110785 Kalare Diagnostic X-Ray Table SystemToshiba Medical Systems Coporation, Japan · 2011 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 1 of its ownK133553 KalareToshiba America Medical Systems, In.C · 2014 · Recalled
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 0 of its ownK143281 Ultimax-iToshibamedical Systems Corporation · 2015

Most influential descendants

Showing 4 of 4 · See all
  • K081091Precision 500D R&F X-Ray SystemGE Healthcare · 2008 · cites it directly3descendants
  • K110785Kalare Diagnostic X-Ray Table SystemToshiba Medical Systems Coporation, Japan · 2011 · 2 generations on2descendants
  • K133553KalareToshiba America Medical Systems, In.C · 2014 · 3 generations on1descendant
  • K143281Ultimax-iToshibamedical Systems Corporation · 2015 · 4 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K862120SCX SystemGeneral Electric Co.19863
0 (this device)K011624Expedio 500D R&F X-Ray SystemGE Medical Systems2001—
+1K081091Precision 500D R&F X-Ray SystemGE Healthcare20089
+2K110785Kalare Diagnostic X-Ray Table SystemToshiba Medical Systems Coporation, Japan20111
+3K133553KalareToshiba America Medical Systems, In.C20143
+4K143281Ultimax-iToshibamedical Systems Corporation2015—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
199710

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200810
201110
201410
201510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K011624, 1986–2015Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in JAA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new JAA device

  1. #1 K253103 Nexus DRF Digital X-ray Imaging Systemscore 13.2 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K862120SCX System
Summary page 2
…In the opinion of GE Medical Systems, the Expedio 500D R&F X- ray System is substantially equivalent to the presently marketed Advantx Legacy/Legacy D R&F X-ray System (K862120 and K973039) and the InfiMed Patriot Digital System (K963037). The Expedio 500D does not include any new indications for use, nor…
General Electric Co.19863
*K963037Patriot
Summary page 1
…xaminations. The Expedio 500D R&F X-ray System is substantially equivalent to the Advantx Radiographic System (Originally cleared as the SCX KB862120), InfiMed Patriot (K963037) and the Legacy/Legacy D Table (K873039). The Expedio 500D R&F X-ray System will conform to applicable sections of 21CFR 1020.3…
Infimed, Inc.1996—
*K973039Legacy/Legacy-D Table
Our OCR of the scanned summary read K873039, FDA’s number for Model 820 Top=Trak (Sierra Laboratories, Inc.). Corrected to the number one digit away whose FDA name carries the summary’s words for the device, “Legacy/Legacy D Table”.
GE Medical Systems19974

Also cleared against K862120: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (4)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K081091Precision 500D R&F X-Ray SystemGE Healthcare20083

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Mar 29, 2019Class IIZ-1754-2019Device DesignThere has been a reported incident of a Distar CRT monitor that has fallen off the monitor wall mount related to product aging.
Feb 6, 2017Class IIZ-2179-2017Device DesignReported incidents of a patient step detaching from the table. A fall from a patient step detaching while in use could result in an injury to a patient or operator.
Nov 8, 2013Class IIZ-0804-2014Employee errorMissing screws in the overhead Video Monitor Suspension. GE discovered that the 4 outer screws that hold the overhead Video Monitor Suspension to the carriage were missing since installation of the system. GE is not aware of any fall of…
Aug 30, 2013Class IIZ-0012-2014Employee errorGE Healthcare has recently become aware of a potential safety issue involving the spotfilm device power assist handle. There is a potential for the internal bolts on the power assist handle to be loose or to loosen and/or fall out. This…
May 2, 2013Class IIZ-1989-2013Device DesignGE Healthcare has recently become aware of a potential safety issue involving the overhead Video Monitor Suspension involving Precision 500D Systems. There is a potential for the locking nut to loosen out of the Video Monitor Suspension…
Jan 2, 2008Not classifiedZ-1610-2008Nonconforming Material/ComponentGE Healthcare was notified that 2 recently installed Precision 500D systems were not in compliance with portions of the Performance Standard for Diagnostic X-ray Equipment. X-ray production was possible from the fluoroscopic X-ray tube…
Oct 4, 2007Not classifiedZ-0369-2008Radiation Control for Health and Safety ActIt was reported that when the GE Precision 500D foot pedal is repeatedly activated, a defect in the fluoro-timer will cause the dose measurement to report a higher value than was actually received by the patient. Patient will receive a…
Aug 13, 2007Not classifiedZ-1477-2008Radiation Control for Health and Safety ActNecessary certification labels are missing from the x-ray contol.
Aug 1, 2007Not classifiedZ-0274-2008Software designInaccurate cassette size display reading/ Inaccurate mAs reading: 1. When the device is in PBL mode and a larger film cassette is inserted into the table Bucky (replacing a smaller cassette) after a protocol is selected on the console…
May 15, 2006Not classifiedZ-1304-06OtherSystems are non-compliant with Federal Performance Standard Title 21, Code of Federal Regulation (CFR), 1020.32(a)(1) in that the systems allow the production of x-rays when the primary protective barrier is not in position to intercept…
Dec 30, 2004Not classifiedZ-0220-05OtherUnits have a defect in accordance with 21 CFR 1003.2 because an incorrect exposure can occur.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • 2 of the 3 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K081091 (GE Healthcare, 2008) has gone furthest, with 3 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K862120.

How does its category compare?

All JAA devices

JAA System, X-Ray, Fluoroscopic, Image-Intensified: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · JAA

2in 2025

2007: 12008: 62010: 12011: 42012: 12013: 62014: 62015: 32016: 22017: 12018: 32019: 62020: 42021: 62022: 12023: 22024: 32025: 22026 (partial year): 1
2007high 6 (2008) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · JAA

89in 2024

2008: 18 days median2011: 48 days median2013: 129 days median2014: 276 days median2015: 197 days median2018: 30 days median2019: 49 days median2020: 39 days median2021: 104 days median2024: 89 days median
2007high 276 (2014) · low 18 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · JAA

4in 2025

2007: 352008: 212009: 182010: 62011: 72012: 22013: 32014: 12015: 12016: 72017: 32018: 12019: 22020: 22021: 22022: 52023: 92024: 22025: 4
2007high 35 (2007) · low 1 (2014)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · JAA

33in 2025

2007: 9,5172008: 9,4842009: 12,0402010: 5,8032011: 14,0002012: 11,6842013: 13,7062014: 10,2652015: 2,9222016: 352017: 562018: 362019: 492020: 392021: 352022: 342023: 412024: 252025: 33
2007high 14,000 (2011) · low 25 (2024)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JAA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—359,517
2008618219,484
20090—1812,040
20101—65,803
2011448714,000
20121—211,684
20136129313,706
20146276110,265
2015319712,922
20162—735
20171—356
2018330136
2019649249
2020439239
20216104235
20221—534
20232—941
2024389225
20252—433
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Expedio 500D is designed to perform radiographic and fluoroscopic x-ray examinations.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K011624: Expedio 500D R&F X-Ray System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K011624

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026