510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Modification to:Escort Vision Central Station Telemetry System, Model 20500

K012336510(k) SpecialCleared Oct 3, 200171-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.1025

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Medical Data Electronics · DSI Detector And Alarm, Arrhythmia

Cleared on Oct 3, 2001 as substantially equivalent to K982104 (Medical Data Electronics, 1998) and 1 other predicate after a 71-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1996.

Decided
Oct 3, 2001
Review
71 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DSI
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K961138 (1996). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1998: 1 other ancestorK961138 · Esort II + 400 Series Monitor · Medical Data Electronics · 19961996199820002002
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor K961138 · Esort II + 400 Series Monitor · Medical Data Electronics · 19960
  1. Root · 1 generation backK961138 Esort II + 400 Series MonitorMedical Data Electronics · 1996
  2. This deviceK012336 Modification to:Escort Vision Central Station Telemetry System…Medical Data Electronics · 2001
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K961138Esort II + 400 Series MonitorMedical Data Electronics1996—
0 (this device)K012336Modification to:Escort Vision Central Station Telemetry System, Model 20500Medical Data Electronics2001—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K012336, 1996–2001Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DSI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DSI device

  1. #1 K243349 BodyGuardian Remote Monitoring System (BGRMS…score 13.1 · 9 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K982104Escort-Link Central Station Monitor Model 20500
Summary page 2
…ological Transmitter/Receiver 870.2910 II Predicate Device Device Description Indications For Use K012336 p 2/3 ESCORT Vision Central Station, 510(k) K982104, clearance date: November 25, 1998 and the ESCORT Guardian, Model 20601, 510(k) K961138, clearance date: July 14, 1997 The modi…
Medical Data Electronics1998—
*K961138Esort II + 400 Series Monitor
Summary page 2
…ption Indications For Use K012336 p 2/3 ESCORT Vision Central Station, 510(k) K982104, clearance date: November 25, 1998 and the ESCORT Guardian, Model 20601, 510(k) K961138, clearance date: July 14, 1997 The modified ESCORT Vision Central Station is a central station monitor comprised of a standard V…
Medical Data Electronics1996—

Also cleared against K982104: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K982104.

How does its category compare?

All DSI devices

DSI Detector And Alarm, Arrhythmia: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DSI

1in 2025

2007: 72008: 52009: 62010: 62011: 62012: 32013: 12014: 42015: 92016: 62018: 22019: 32020: 22023: 22024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 9 (2015) · low 0 (2017)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DSI

243in 2019

2007: 151 days median2008: 70 days median2009: 73 days median2010: 111 days median2011: 114 days median2012: 113 days median2014: 200 days median2015: 127 days median2016: 224 days median2019: 243 days median
2007high 243 (2019) · low 70 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DSI

18in 2025

2007: 42008: 82009: 32010: 52011: 32012: 12018: 12019: 42020: 22022: 12023: 22025: 182026 (partial year): 1
2007high 18 (2025) · low 0 (2013)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DSI

712in 2025

2007: 642008: 1562009: 2792010: 8232011: 7932012: 7662013: 7952014: 1,0002015: 1,6452016: 4,3522017: 3,5942018: 3,6482019: 3,4852020: 3,0842021: 3,0922022: 1,6382023: 1,6162024: 1,3202025: 712
2007high 4,352 (2016) · low 64 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DSI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20077151464
20085708156
20096733279
201061115823
201161143793
201231131766
20131—0795
2014420001,000
2015912701,645
2016622404,352
20170—03,594
20182—13,648
2019324343,485
20202—23,084
20210—03,092
20220—11,638
20232—21,616
20241—01,320
20251—18712
20261—1—

What is it indicated for?

The ESCORT Vision Central Station is intended to be used to provide, using a wireless LAN for communication, centralized surveillance and documentation of patient vital sign data and arrhythmia/ST monitoring for a variable number of ESCORT II Bedside Monitors and a variable number of UHF telemetry transmitters in the hospital environment. It is intended for use by healthcare practitioners trained in the use of the equipment only.

The ST algorithm has been tested for accuracy of the ST segment measurement data. The significance of the ST segment changes must be determined by a physician.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K012336: Modification to:Escort Vision Central Station Telemetry System, Model 20500.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K012336

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026