510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Escort-Link Central Station Monitor Model 20500

K982104510(k) SpecialCleared Nov 25, 1998163-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.1025

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Medical Data Electronics · MLD Monitor, St Segment With Alarm

Cleared on Nov 25, 1998 after a 163-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 2 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Nov 25, 1998
Review
163 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MLD
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

2 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2001: 1 descendant cleared2006: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK982104 Escort-Link Central Station Monitor Model 20500Medical Data Electronics · 1998
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK061675 Vision VXC Central Station, Model 4300Invivo Corporation · 2006
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK012336 Modification to:Escort Vision Central Station Telemetry System…Medical Data Electronics · 2001

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K061675Vision VXC Central Station, Model 4300Invivo Corporation · 2006 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K012336Modification to:Escort Vision Central Station Telemetry System, Model 20500Medical Data Electronics · 2001 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K982104Escort-Link Central Station Monitor Model 20500Medical Data Electronics1998—
+1K061675Vision VXC Central Station, Model 4300Invivo Corporation2006—
+1K012336Modification to:Escort Vision Central Station Telemetry System, Model 20500Medical Data Electronics2001—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200110
200610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K982104, 1998–2006Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MLD? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—ESCORT-LINK® Central Station Monitor Model 20500
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (2)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K061675Vision VXC Central Station, Model 4300Invivo Corporation20060
K012336Modification to:Escort Vision Central Station Telemetry System, Model 20500Medical Data Electronics20010

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K061675 (Invivo Corporation, 2006) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MLD devices

MLD Monitor, St Segment With Alarm: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MLD

1in 2010

2008: 12010: 1
2007high 1 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MLD

Too few MLD 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · MLD

No recall names MLD since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · MLD

1in 2019

2007: 32008: 52009: 32010: 32011: 62012: 72014: 12015: 12017: 12018: 12019: 1
2007high 7 (2012) · low 0 (2013)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MLD, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—03
20081—05
20090—03
20101—03
20110—06
20120—07
20130—00
20140—01
20150—01
20160—00
20170—01
20180—01
20190—01
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The ESCORT-LINK® Central Station Monitor is intended to be used to provide, using a wireless LAN for communication, centralized surveillance and documentation of patient vital sign data and arrhythmia/ST monitoring for a variable number of ESCORT® II Bedside Monitors and a variable number of UHF telemetry transmitters in the hospital environment. It is intended for use by healthcare practitioners trained in the use of the equipment only.

The ST algorithm has been tested for accuracy of the ST segment measurement data. The significance of the ST segment changes must be determined by a physician.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K982104: Escort-Link Central Station Monitor Model 20500.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K982104

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026