510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Accent

K013574510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 15, 200278-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.2050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Confirma, Inc. · LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological

Cleared on Jan 15, 2002 after a 78-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 18 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jan 15, 2002
Review
78 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LLZ
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

18 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2004: 1 descendant cleared2009: 4 descendants cleared2018: 2 descendants cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2019: 2 descendants cleared2017: 1 descendant cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared2024: 2 descendants cleared2026: 2 descendants cleared2025: 1 descendant cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK013574 AccentConfirma, Inc. · 2002
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 17 of its ownK041286 Dynacad V1.0Mri Devices Corp. · 2004
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 9 of its ownK081556 Cadstream, Version 5.0Confirma, Inc. · 2009
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 8 of its ownK092954 Cadstream Version 5Confirma, Inc. · 2009 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 4 of its ownK170195 QuantXQuantitative Insights, Inc. · 2017
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 3 of its ownK210670 BU-CADTaihao Medical, Inc. · 2021

Showing 5 of 18 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2004: 12009: 42014: 12017: 12018: 22019: 22021: 12023: 12024: 22025: 12026: 2
2004high 4 (2009) · low 0 (2005)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 18 · See all
  • K041286Dynacad V1.0Mri Devices Corp. · 2004 · cites it directly17descendants
  • K081556Cadstream, Version 5.0Confirma, Inc. · 2009 · 2 generations on9descendants
  • K092954Cadstream Version 5Confirma, Inc. · 2009 · 3 generations on8descendants
  • K170195QuantXQuantitative Insights, Inc. · 2017 · 3 generations on4descendants
  • K210670BU-CADTaihao Medical, Inc. · 2021 · 4 generations on3descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K013574AccentConfirma, Inc.2002—
+1K041286Dynacad V1.0Mri Devices Corp.2004—
+2K081556Cadstream, Version 5.0Confirma, Inc.2009—
+3K092954Cadstream Version 5Confirma, Inc.20093
+3K170195QuantXQuantitative Insights, Inc.2017—
+4K210670BU-CADTaihao Medical, Inc.2021—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200410
200940
201410
201710
201820
201920
202110
202310
202420
202510
202620
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K013574, 2002–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LLZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LLZ device

  1. #1 K230955 syngo Application Softwarescore 21.5 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Vital Images Vitrea
Named without a submission number
—
*—Acculmage Image Display Software
Named without a submission number
—
*—Siemens BOLD MRI
Named without a submission number
—
*—Voxar Plug n’ View 3D
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (18)

See all 18

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K041286Dynacad V1.0Mri Devices Corp.200417

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K041286 (Mri Devices Corp., 2004) has gone furthest, with 17 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All LLZ devices

LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LLZ

58in 2025

2007: 762008: 942009: 702010: 512011: 1062012: 822013: 952014: 782015: 642016: 822017: 782018: 1042019: 742020: 812021: 832022: 652023: 872024: 622025: 582026 (partial year): 45
2007high 106 (2011) · low 51 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LLZ

173in 2025

2007: 36 days median2008: 52 days median2009: 62 days median2010: 98 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 87 days median2013: 84 days median2014: 89 days median2015: 90 days median2016: 90 days median2017: 107 days median2018: 105 days median2019: 107 days median2020: 115 days median2021: 116 days median2022: 137 days median2023: 157 days median2024: 131 days median2025: 173 days median2026 (partial year): 110 days median
2007high 173 (2025) · low 36 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LLZ

11in 2025

2007: 202008: 322009: 212010: 172011: 302012: 122013: 642014: 62015: 162016: 122017: 52018: 72019: 22020: 62021: 32022: 42023: 82024: 62025: 112026 (partial year): 14
2007high 64 (2013) · low 2 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LLZ

116in 2025

2007: 1522008: 1542009: 1452010: 1452011: 4542012: 2662013: 1,1302014: 15,6312015: 2112016: 2902017: 1042018: 722019: 882020: 822021: 702022: 282023: 262024: 422025: 116
2007high 15,631 (2014) · low 26 (2023)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LLZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007763620152
2008945232154
2009706221145
2010519817145
20111067930454
2012828712266
20139584641,130
20147889615,631
2015649016211
2016829012290
2017781075104
2018104105772
201974107288
202081115682
202183116370
202265137428
202387157826
202462131642
20255817311116
20264511014—

What is it indicated for?

ACCENT™ is a computerized tissue segmentation device intended for use in conjunction with magnetic resonance (MRI) imaging data to identify similar tissue types. When interpreted by a skilled physician, this device provides information that may be useful in screening and diagnosis. ACCENT can also be used to provide accurate and reproducible measurements of the longest diameter and volume of identified tissue. Patient management decisions should not be made based solely on the results of ACCENT analysis.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K013574: Accent.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K013574

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026