510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class I · 2025

Oec 9800 Plus Digital Mobile Imaging System

K021049510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 17, 200216-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1650Recalls 26 (1 Class I)

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Ge Oec Medical Systems · OWB Interventional Fluoroscopic X-Ray System

Cleared on Apr 17, 2002 after a 16-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 1 of the 77 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 76 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 26 times, including a Class I recall.

Decided
Apr 17, 2002
Review
16 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OWB
Recalls
26 (1 Class I)
Predicates
0

76 later devices descend from it, 6 citing it directly. 1 of the 77 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Descendants, by year cleared 2006: 2 descendants cleared2002: 1 descendant cleared2004: 2 descendants cleared2012: 3 descendants cleared2011: 2 descendants cleared2020: 6 descendants cleared2016: 3 descendants cleared2017: 6 descendants cleared2014: 4 descendants cleared2008: 1 descendant cleared2009: 3 descendants cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2013: 3 descendants cleared2018: 3 descendants cleared2019: 4 descendants cleared2024: 5 descendants cleared2021: 9 descendants cleared2015: 2 descendants cleared2023: 3 descendants cleared2025: 9 descendants cleared2026: 3 descendants cleared2022: 1 descendant cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK021049 Oec 9800 Plus Digital Mobile Imaging SystemGe Oec Medical Systems · 2002
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 40 of its ownK041932 Oec Olympus Fluoroscopic Imaging SystemGe Oec Medical Systems, Inc. · 2004 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 38 of its ownK073543 Oec 9900 EliteGe Oec Medical Systems · 2008 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 35 of its ownK082781 Oec 9900 EliteGe Healthcare Surgery · 2009 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 18 of its ownK120613 Oec 9900 EliteGe Healthcare Surgery GE Oec Medical Systems, Inc. · 2012 · Recalled
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 18 of its ownK061203 Ziehm Vision R Digital Mobile Imaging SystemZiehm Imaging, Inc. · 2006 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 76 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2002: 12004: 22006: 22008: 12009: 32010: 12011: 22012: 32013: 32014: 42015: 22016: 32017: 62018: 32019: 42020: 62021: 92022: 12023: 32024: 52025: 92026: 3
2002high 9 (2021) · low 0 (2003)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 76 · See all
  • K041932Oec Olympus Fluoroscopic Imaging SystemGe Oec Medical Systems, Inc. · 2004 · cites it directly40descendants
  • K073543Oec 9900 EliteGe Oec Medical Systems · 2008 · 2 generations on38descendants
  • K082781Oec 9900 EliteGe Healthcare Surgery · 2009 · 2 generations on35descendants
  • K120613Oec 9900 EliteGe Healthcare Surgery GE Oec Medical Systems, Inc. · 2012 · 3 generations on18descendants
  • K061203Ziehm Vision R Digital Mobile Imaging SystemZiehm Imaging, Inc. · 2006 · cites it directly18descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K021049Oec 9800 Plus Digital Mobile Imaging SystemGe Oec Medical Systems2002—
+1K041932Oec Olympus Fluoroscopic Imaging SystemGe Oec Medical Systems, Inc.20047
+2K073543Oec 9900 EliteGe Oec Medical Systems20085
+2K082781Oec 9900 EliteGe Healthcare Surgery20094
+3K120613Oec 9900 EliteGe Healthcare Surgery GE Oec Medical Systems, Inc.20127
+1K061203Ziehm Vision R Digital Mobile Imaging SystemZiehm Imaging, Inc.20064

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200210
200420
200620
200810
200930
201010
201120
201230
201330
201440
201520
201630
201760
201830
201940
202060
202190
202210
202330
202450
202590
202630
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K021049, 2002–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new OWB device

  1. #1 K251602 Alphenix, INFX-8000V/B, INFX-8000V/S, V9.6…score 18.3 · 18 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—OEC 9800 Digital Mobile Imaging System
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (76)

See all 76

6 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K041932Oec Olympus Fluoroscopic Imaging SystemGe Oec Medical Systems, Inc.200440
K061203Ziehm Vision R Digital Mobile Imaging SystemZiehm Imaging, Inc.200618
K022114ImperiumElmstech, Inc.200215
K032761KMC-950 C-Arm Mobile SystemUnited Radiology Systems, Inc.200414
K103425Zen-7000, Fluoroscopic X-Ray SystemGenoray America, Inc.20113
K121303Mobile C-ArmCanon Inc. -Medical Equipment Group20120

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jul 2, 2025Class IIZ-2341-2025Radiation Control for Health and Safety ActGE HealthCare has become aware of a non-conformance to 21 CFR 1020.30 (k) in certain OEC 9800 and OEC 9900 Elite C-arm Systems. Specifically, impacted systems are missing the full layer of lead tape in the collimator covers, which will…
Nov 21, 2024Class IIZ-0706-2025Process controlDue to manufacturing issue of insufficient sealing of X-ray tubes and can result in a potential oil leak and loss of fluoroscopic imaging capability.
May 15, 2023Class IIZ-2279-2023Process controlImage intensifiers on systems, used to provide fluoroscopic/digital spot images can become detached if the systems encounter a large impact force when moved, which may result in the image intensifier falling, which could lead to injuries…
May 15, 2023Class IIZ-2276-2023Process controlImage intensifiers on systems, used to provide fluoroscopic/digital spot images can become detached if the systems encounter a large impact force when moved, which may result in the image intensifier falling, which could lead to injuries…
Jul 22, 2016Class IIZ-2629-2016Software design (manufacturing process)A firmware issue in the supplied LCD workstation monitor(s). Under some circumstances, the monitor(s) may appear dark with no video displayed.
Oct 3, 2014Class IIZ-0195-2015Component design/selectionGE Healthcare initiated a field correction because prior revision of components were potentially installed on certain OEC 9800, FlexiView 8800, OEC MiniView 6800 and OEC UroView 2800 systems.
Apr 26, 2010Class IIZ-2241-2012Component change controlGE OEC recalled certain 9800 Fluoroscope & 9900 Elite Models because the Snubber Board did not conform to the IEC 60601-1 standard for clearance and creepage of voltage isolation.
Nov 6, 2009Class IIZ-2240-2012Device DesignGE OEC is recalling certain 9800 Image Intensified Flouroscopic x-ray systems due to customer complaint analysis showing that a replacement Hitachi 160 GB Hard Drive, when installed on certain models is susceptible of causing…
Oct 10, 2008Class IIZ-2262-2012Device DesignGE initiated a correction to the instructions/use due to the potential for erroneous auto injection of contrast dye.
Aug 29, 2008Not classifiedZ-1730-2009Release of Material/Component prior to receiving test resultsGE Healthcare has found that the sterile products manufactured by Contour Fabricators, Inc. (CFI) for GE healthcare (GEHC) may have sterile seals that could be compromised during the shelf life of the products. This issue could result in…
Aug 15, 2008Not classifiedZ-1706-2009Packaging process controlGE Healthcare has found that the sterile products manufactured by Contour Fabricators, Inc. (CFI) for GE healthcare (GEHC) may have seals that could be compromised during the shelf life of the products. This issue could result in the…
Aug 15, 2008Not classifiedZ-1708-2009Packaging process controlGE Healthcare has found that the sterile products manufactured by Contour Fabricators, Inc. (CFI) for GE healthcare (GEHC) may have seals that could be compromised during the shelf life of the products. This issue could result in the…
Aug 15, 2008Not classifiedZ-1707-2009Packaging process controlGE Healthcare has found that the sterile products manufactured by Contour Fabricators, Inc. (CFI) for GE healthcare (GEHC) may have seals that could be compromised during the shelf life of the products. This issue could result in the…
Aug 15, 2008Not classifiedZ-1709-2009Packaging process controlGE Healthcare has found that the sterile products manufactured by Contour Fabricators, Inc. (CFI) for GE healthcare (GEHC) may have seals that could be compromised during the shelf life of the products. This issue could result in the…
Apr 15, 2008Not classifiedZ-1705-2008Device DesignUse of existing four-pedal footswitch on a different machine may cause various operational errors.
Feb 22, 2008Class IZ-2038-2012Software designPlease be aware that this is not a new recall. The firm has taken action; but, due to administrative issues this recall is now being classified by the Agency. The vertical lift column power supply in the mainframe C-arm of the device is…
Nov 19, 2007Class IIZ-2026-2012Device DesignPlease be aware that this is not a new recall. The firm has taken action; but, due to administrative issues this recall is now being classified by the Agency. GE OEC recalled imaging devices OEC 9900, OEC 9800, and OEC 8800 as a result of…
Mar 27, 2007Class IIZ-2125-2012Software designPlease be aware that this is not a new recall. The firm has taken action; but, due to administrative issues this recall is now being classified by the Agency. GE OEC had discovered an issue with the hard disk drives that were installed on…
Mar 1, 2007Not classifiedZ-0681-2007OtherDuring routine service, primary and/or secondary collimators may not have been properly reinstalled.
Mar 1, 2007Not classifiedZ-0680-2007OtherDuring routine service, primary and/or secondary collimators may not have been properly reinstalled.
Mar 1, 2007Not classifiedZ-0677-2007OtherDuring routine service, primary and/or secondary collimators may not have been properly reinstalled.
Mar 1, 2007Not classifiedZ-0682-2007OtherDuring routine service, primary and/or secondary collimators may not have been properly reinstalled.
Feb 9, 2007Not classifiedZ-0557-2007OtherDuring routine service, a cover may have been installed without the required proper lead shielding.
Feb 9, 2007Not classifiedZ-0556-2007OtherDuring routine service, a cover may have been installed without the required proper lead shielding.
Feb 9, 2007Not classifiedZ-0558-2007OtherDuring routine service, a cover may have been installed without the required proper lead shielding.
Feb 9, 2007Not classifiedZ-0559-2007OtherDuring routine service, a cover may have been installed without the required proper lead shielding.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K041932 (Ge Oec Medical Systems, Inc., 2004) has gone furthest, with 40 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All OWB devices

OWB Interventional Fluoroscopic X-Ray System: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · OWB

22in 2025

2007: 32008: 42009: 92010: 72011: 62012: 62013: 112014: 152015: 112016: 162017: 202018: 232019: 92020: 162021: 242022: 212023: 122024: 132025: 222026 (partial year): 15
2007high 24 (2021) · low 3 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OWB

148in 2025

2007: 52 days median2008: 135 days median2009: 99 days median2010: 66 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 37 days median2013: 119 days median2014: 158 days median2015: 66 days median2016: 103 days median2017: 76 days median2018: 54 days median2019: 174 days median2020: 53 days median2021: 60 days median2022: 90 days median2023: 152 days median2024: 126 days median2025: 148 days median2026 (partial year): 221 days median
2007high 221 (2026) · low 37 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OWB

42so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2008: 12013: 102014: 92015: 352016: 132017: 132018: 62019: 72020: 82021: 312022: 242023: 222024: 112025: 302026 (partial year): 42
2007high 42 (2026) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · OWB

14,008in 2025

2007: 12011: 12012: 12013: 272014: 1032015: 2,1342016: 4,0742017: 1,6042018: 1,4492019: 1,5582020: 1,5812021: 1,9812022: 2,9322023: 7,6042024: 7,9422025: 14,008
2007high 14,008 (2025) · low 0 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OWB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200735201
2008413510
200999900
201076600
201167901
201263701
2013111191027
2014151589103
20151166352,134
201616103134,074
20172076131,604
2018235461,449
2019917471,558
2020165381,581
20212460311,981
20222190242,932
202312152227,604
202413126117,942
2025221483014,008
20261522142—

What is it indicated for?

The OEC 9800 Plus Digital Mobile Imaging System is designed to provide fluoroscopic and spot-film imaging of the patient during diagnostic, surgical and interventional procedures. Examples of clinical applications may include cholangiography, endoscopic, urologic, orthopedic, neurologic, vascular, cardiac, critical care and emergency room procedures. The system may be used for other imaging applications at the physician’s discretion.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K021049: Oec 9800 Plus Digital Mobile Imaging System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K021049

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026